In-Clinic Abortion Is Murder

Roe v. Wade set the stage for the US to talk about abortion and the rights that pregnant citizens have regarding their bodies. The Supreme Court declared that abortion was a fundamental right, much to many citizens, and organizations dismay. States were no longer allowed to prohibit abortion unless the pregnant person's health or life is in danger. This created a divide between Americans as people quickly found themselves on the side of pro-life or pro-choice.

The ruling of Roe v. Wade included three key ideas. The first key idea was that women had the right to choose to have an abortion during the stage of pregnancy when the fetus had little chance of survival outside the womb and that women were able to obtain an abortion within unreasonable interferences from the state. The second idea confirmed a state’s power to restrict abortions when a fetus could live outside the womb, except in the case when the mother’s life was at risk. The final key idea that was decided in the ruling was that the state has interests in both the health of the women and the life of the fetus (Brannen and Hanes, 2001).

There have been many debates over abortion. One of the more famous acts in history about abortion is Roe vs. Wade on January 22, 1973. In this case the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions. This includes the decision to have an abortion without interference from politics and regulations, or religion. Therefore, a state may not ban abortion prior to viability.

Regardless of the opinions surrounding abortion, a majority of people are familiar with the Supreme court cases of Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. These two cases have played a tremendous role in regard to the abortion debate. In 1973, the Roe v. Wade case was ruled in favour of Roe and stated the stringent criminalization of abortion in Texas was deemed unconstitutional under the fourteenth amendment. The law violated the right of privacy, which implied the privacy of a woman’s decision to an abortion. Although the courts agreed with Roe, they also recognized the rights to an abortion are not absolute. Limitations to the right was based on the trimesters of pregnancy with the first trimester protecting the woman’s choice and the third trimester being acceptable for states to regulate or even ban abortions outside of therapeutic reasons.

Abortion has always been considered a controversial issue in America. When it comes to abortion there are and there will continue to be many different views about the moral acceptance and the social political sides of abortion. Therefore when the Roe vs. Wade decision was announced on January 22, 1973, it was received with a lot of controversy from the public. The Roe vs. Wade case is known to be the case that legalized abortion in the U.S. Before the Roe vs. Wade case, abortion was looked at as morally wrong and it was considered a crime that could cause a woman to spend time in prison. When Roe vs. Wade case ruling, made the court accepted for the first time that the constitutional right to privacy “is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” (Summary of Roe v. Wade, 1973). A woman’s life was changed with the ruling because now a pregnant woman who did not wish to have her child was allowed to terminate her pregnancy without the fear of being arrested if they were ever caught or the fear of risking their life going through with an illegal abortion.

Roe v. Wade was a decision made by United States Supreme Court regarding abortion in 1973. It was, and still is, one of the most controversial decisions the Supreme Court has ever made. Abortion is defined “the ending of pregnancy by removing a fetus or embryo before it can survive outside the uterus”. The appellant was a single, pregnant woman from Texas who wished to get an abortion. Prior to the court’s decision, abortion was illegal under Texas state law except in cases where the abortion would save the pregnant woman’s life. The appellee was Henry Wade, a lawyer defending the Texas state law. The court ruled on the side of Roe, with a 7-2 decision. The Supreme Court “ruled that the Texas statute violated Jane Roe's constitutional right to privacy”, and argued that the “Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an

In the court case Roe v. Wade, Jane Roe (false name to protect her real identity) wanted an abortion. However, in some states like in Texas (where this all took places) abortion was illegal unless it was to save the woman’s life. In 1970, Roe and her team of lawyers were fighting to protect her and all of the women in the world to have a say in what’s right and wrong if them. Roe’s team of lawyers were suing Henry Wade, the district attorney of dallas county, Texas. Her team of lawyers and er wanted to obtain an injunction, which would stop Wade from enforcing the law against abortion. The Federal court ruled in favor of Roe, stating that the Texas law against abortion was unconstitutional. Wade appealed the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Roe 7-2. They stated that “with Roe’s assertion that woman had the absolute right to end pregnancy in anyway and at any time...woman’s right to privacy had to be balanced with a state’s interest in regulating abortion”(Encyclopaedia Britannica). This statement means that it the choice of whether to have an abortion or not is up to the woman, but the state has a right to protect the fetus.

In Roe v. Wade, in 1973, the Supreme Court held a case that a pregnant woman has the full privacy right to have an abortion. The right to abortion is not guaranteed and must be stable against the State’s countervailing benefits in keeping the health of the woman and in protecting the life of the unborn child. The State’s belief in protecting the health of the woman becomes definite, therefore greatly enough to support state ruling of abortion under the strict scrutiny standard of judicial review; after the first trimester, which is the stage of pregnancy when abortion becomes dangerous to the mother carrying the child to term. The State’s concern in protecting the life of the unborn child becomes irresistible, after possibility, the stage of pregnancy when the unborn child is capable of independent life. Because neither interest is irresistible before the second trimester, the State may not regulate abortion in the first trimester either to reserve the woman’s health or to protect the life of the unborn child. After the first trimester the State may control the act of an abortion, but only for the purpose of protecting the woman’s health, not for the purpose of protecting the life of the unborn child. After viability, the State may regulate, and even forbid, abortion to protect the life of the unborn child, except when the act of abortion is needed to

It is not legal for a state to deny the people personal, marital, family, and sexual right to privacy. No case in history has the court declared that a fetus, which is an infant developing in the womb, is a person. Therefore, a fetus does not have any legal “right to life”. Roe argued the Texas law is unconstitutional and should be overturned.” In Roe’s argument the issue being appealed would be that she, the plaintiff has the right to obtain an abortion whether the pregnancy is life threatening to the mother or not. An abortion is solely the mothers decision and the child is unborn therefore has no rights and need not be protected by the States or Constitutional law(Roe v Wade,

Wade was a high court consideration for Texas law outlawing abortion in all cases except those in which the life of the mother was at risk. Lower federal courts had declared the statute unconstitutional, deciding that women cannot be denied the right to decide whether to complete a pregnancy or not because their right to basic privacy and liberty interests contained in the Constitution would be violated. In a 7-2 vote, the Supreme Court affirmed the lower court’s ruling, concluding that the constitutional rights to privacy and liberty protected a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy. While the Constitution does not mention any right to privacy verbatim, there is a guarantee of privacy in certain zones which are explained in the amendments within the Bill of Rights and in the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of liberty. Marriage, contraception, family relationships as well as child-rearing are all areas or zones of privacy protected. The conclusion in Roe v. Wade saw the access to abortion to be a fundamental right and only a “compelling state interest” could enact legislation to limit this right. In addition the state must also have “important and legitimate interest” in protecting the health of the mother and “the potential human life” inside

In 1973, the US Supreme Court declared abortion a nationwide fundamental right through a trial called Roe vs. Wade and protected this right underneath the Fourteenth Amendment, more specifically, the right to privacy. A basic human right, especially one outlined by the Supreme Court, must never run at risk or threat chiefly because not everyone agrees with it. Under no circumstances should a pregnancy ever adjudge mandatory. Abortion is a Constitutional right and as a nation we must fight to give the right and freedom of safe abortions to women all around the nation, make birth control and sex education accessible to women, and raise awareness about the topic itself. (LawCornell)

Abortion refers to the termination of pregnancy at any stage that does not affect birth; medically, according to Oxford Dictionary abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a foetus or embryo by natural causes before it is able to survive independently. Abortion is a controversial topic that causes many arguments because of the different opinions that persons have. Abortion has two main proponents, persons that are for abortion and those that are against abortion. Those that are for abortions think that woman have the right to do anything with their body but those that are against abortion sticks to what the Bible says about taking a life of

Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy before birth, resulting in the death of the embryo or fetus. Abortion is an issue in which most people have an opinion on. Whether it is pro-life or pro-choice, most opinions do reflect the individual and their personal opinions in life. As will be discussed further on, there is a great dividend in the population concerning their sides in this matter.

Abortion is to end a pregnancy before the child can live outside of the uterus. It is done in a number of ways. It can be done by surgical abortion and by an abortion pill. There are many types of surgical abortion. In order to figure out which one needs to be done is based on how far into the pregnancy the woman is. All surgical abortions involve going into the uterus and taking out the fetus. The abortion pill is when a doctor gives the mother two different pills that will end the pregnancy. The first pill will take away an important hormone that the baby needs to grow. The second one will help the body get rid of the fetus. (How an abortion is carried out) Religion is a big influence on abortion and how people view it. I will

“There are nearly 1.2 million abortions performed in the United States each year” (Operation Rescue, 2014). That was 1.2 million innocent lives that were ended before they even had a chance to begin. Abortion has been legal for decades now, and it is time to put a stop to all the murdering of unborn children. This senseless killing of an unborn child needs to be recognized for what it truly is, and that is legalized murder. Abortions should be made illegal in the United States because it is taking the life of an innocent person, there are other options out there and lastly abortions are not only harming the unborn child but also cause harm to the mother.