In The Shadows Of Settlement By Desiree Nilsson

A crisis can be described as disruption or breakdown in a person’s normal or usual way of functioning in life, when individuals are confronted with problems that cannot be solved. (Caplan, G.1961) A crisis cannot be resolved by a person’s customary problem-solving resources/skills. Crisis can be handled different and are different for people in the way they can be handled; a crisis is mush different from a problem or emergency. A problem can create stress and be sometimes difficult to resolve, the

Each of them may adopt behavior that ranges from the very passive,through facilitative to the highly active.The form and character mediation in a particular international conflict are determined by the context of both the international system and the conflict itself,the issues,the parties involved,and the identity of the mediator.The important of this reciprocal influence can hardly be overemphasized (Berovitch , ,p.133)

In order for conflict to be resolved both sides must understand one another’s concerns and be willing to compromise, thus understanding is the first step to resolution. According to Varshney (2001), “promoting communication between members of different religious communities, civic networks often make neighborhood-level peace possible. Routine engagement allows people to come together and form organizations in times of tension” (p. 375). Additionally, the Varshney (2001) article states that if institutions are created that cater to the cultural, economic, and social needs of both sides then the support for peace in the community become strong. Getting people to try to see eye to eye and co-exist without conflict is a great solution to ethnic conflict. According to constructivists ethnicity and in turn ethnic conflict is what people make of it and that race can be made and erased. According to this idea, resolution can come from getting people to see ethnicity and ethnic conflict differently by promoting communication.

This essay will focus on how theorists of peace and conflict have analysed the conflict in recent history. Especially, the peace process after the first Palestinian intifada and the 1993 Oslo-agreements will be analysed. In addition, this essay will shed light on the involvement of the United States in the

War is not a common phenomenon anymore after the post cold war era. According a research conducted on active armed conflict across the world at the Uppsala University in Sweden, of all the 101 active armed conflicted between the late 80s and mid 90s, only six were actually between two different states (Solenberg &Wallensteen, 1997). These statistics clearly indicates that the conflict in today's world is more internal and ethnic based.

In the world today, ideological differences are the root causes of many conflicts between individuals or nations and if allowed to aggravate, it becomes the brush strokes for a canvas that turn out to be the portrait of an all-out warfare. However, before countries engage in militarism, it is prudent that the leadership takes pragmatic steps towards a peaceable resolution because the misconception among architects of conflict is to further private agenda for their personal benefit. In a blind quest for gratification, these benefits are an opportunity cost for the larger society who is the unfortunate recipient of the ensuing anarchy. Nothing is fair in war; casualties caught up within the crossfire

While advocacy of federalism as a tool for managing ethnic conflict continues to grow with respect to a diverse set of cases, its proponents and opponents point to different cases of federal success and failure. However, supposed benefits and no-benefits of federalism have been challenged by both those who argue that federalism exacerbates or mitigates ethnic conflict. This debate about the merits and demerits of post-conflict federalism has reached a deadlock, largely as a consequence of

After we have spent the first week of January together for our Transcending Conflict class, we leave the session wondering what type of qualities and characteristics it takes to be a successful mediator and peacemaker during these modern times. It is known that our Western culture is extremely “settlement driven” in terms of the mediation and dispute resolution process. We focus on the substantive issue of a conflict, and we hope to reach a mutually beneficial agreement that is “easy” and “quick.” As Americans, we usually do not get much credit, if any at all, about our ability to focus on other people through “compassion, strength, and common humanity.”

A crisis is a situation that seriously and immediately threatens one or more of an organization's four vital assets: life, property, operations/income, and reputation. Crises are characteristically uncommon, unpredictable, and sudden, demanding immediate responses in order to save lives, avert secondary damage, and restore normal operations.

This is a state-of-the-art book on conflict management and negotiation by well known negotiator and mediator William L. Ury, an American National, who is world 's leading negotiation expert, he has mediated situations ranging from corporate arena to wildcat strikes, and from family disputes to ethnic wars in the Middle East, the Balkans, N. Ireland and many other places. He has also worked on the problem of how to prevent

The Unceasing Human Conflict Human conflict is witnessed in many circumstances of life. People tend to experience some degrees of conflict in their lives, which can be caused by themselves or a third party. In these conflicts, there is always the tendency that one party contributes to more torture to the other party. As a result, the miseries keep on worsening from one level to the other with no hopes of improving the condition.

In nearly any conflict, regardless of its gravity, all parties involved greatly benefit from a confident, experienced leader who acts as a calming mediator. Without such an influence, an air of anger and paranoia, devoid of a soothing voice of reason to calm the turbulence, will surely arise. In fact, it can be said that without an individual with such a quality, there is

The following wars have been divided between 1.) Wars caused by ethnic issues and 2.) Wars not caused by ethnic issues. After determining the cause of war, I will focus on particular aspects of the war predominantly the death toll, how long the war lasted, if core states got involved in the conflict and if so how far removed were they from the region of conflict. Finally and most importantly, I will compare and contrast the two types of wars (1.) Wars caused by ethnic conflict and 2.) Wars not caused by ethnic conflict) and determine how these wars were ultimately resolved. More specifically, I am determining if wars caused by ethic issues are resolved by internal means or whether they are resolved by external factors such as core states or states that have an invested interest in the matter.

In the post-cold war era, with the rise of globalisation and the interdependence of markets, one can observe the moribund decline of traditional inter-state conflicts and the rise of more complex intra-state conflicts. The reasons behind these conflicts are manifold but at the heart is arguably always a conflict of interest between two or more groups. The Uppsala Conflict Data Project (2016) defines armed

According to Lillibridge and Klukken (1978), crisis is an event or situation that cause " 地n upset in equilibrium at the failure of one's traditional problem-solving approach which results in disorganization, hopelessness, sadness, confusion, and panic" (62). In the face of crisis, there is an urgent need to swing to action and communication is the only vehicle that can convey this message to everyone concerned. When crisis occur, communication challenges becomes worsened because the