In Vitro Testing: An Alternative To Animal Experimentation

Although there have been significant medical breakthroughs based in animal testing and experimentation, animal testing is a poor method of science as it is largely useless and

As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.

Just think about your pet, your cute dog that receives you with so many happiness, that little bunny that jumps all over your room, I think you love it, no? well now think that animal that you love, stuck in a cage suffering with needles all over its body, crying for help but is an animal, who cares?, right?......... Stop.

For many years, the field of science has used animals in medical experiments worldwide, because of this innocent animals are being killed everyday. They are being tested with new drugs, new treatments, and by many makeup companies. Connecticut recently celebrated the passage of the “Beagle Freedom Law”, a law that requires laboratories to work with charities and rescue groups to find homes for research cats and dogs. Animals are being tested so humans do not have to be but animal tests do not reliably predict results in human beings, although animals are the closest thing to humans. Most experiments involving animals are flawed, wasting the lives of innocent animal subjects. Over 100 million animals suffer a year from testing. Testing animals is a lot more expensive than alternative methods and it is wasting government research dollars. Animal testing is not only a bad idea, but it is also inhuman and it should not be tolerated. The FDA should stop allowing animal testing. An animal does not give out the same results on a test than a human would.

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel and inhumane but also often ineffective. Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. There have been past occasions where drugs passed on animals weren’t even safe. There is no excuse for animal testing in today’s techy world, there are now many alternatives for animal testing that would put an end to the pain and suffering endured by these innocent animals during human testing.

The testing of animals in scientific and commercial research has been debated for many years. Some people view animals as companions or part of the family, but others think of them as a way to advance medicine by providing researchers with a means to develop better medical techniques, discovering vaccines, and helping to find a cure for a disease. Regardless of how a person may view animals, they are worthy of better protection by our government and us as a society. Although some animal testing has been successful, there are research alternatives that could eliminate the pain, suffering, and deaths that animals endure in scientific research. Therefore, animals should not be used in scientific research

Based on this, the hypothesis is that animal testing is a gift of life and hope for everyone. The main purpose of animal testing is that it helps in the search for drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Keep in mind that many medical procedures have been made possible by animal experimentation, like HIV and cancer drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. We can conclude that some experiments are considered essential for treatment of diseases such as diabetes, Alzheimer’s. Also the procedures to treat heart disease as is the case of open heart and lung surgery, coronary bypass improves blood flow to the heart, and the replacement of a defective heart valve. We should also mention the techniques and equipment for renal dialysis. Radiation therapy also was tested first in mice and rats. The cure for measles, smallpox, blood transfusions, and microsurgery to reattach severed limbs. In other promising research on lessons of the spinal cord and paralysis, so-called neurological, trying to find ways to repair nerve tissue and restore movement. These are some of the reasons why the scientific community and much of society support this practice. Which shows that without animal testing, many humans, and also animals would not be alive today, would not have been possible to eradicate many pests that plague mankind.

The Science world evolved greatly throughout the past hundreds of years and animal testing was apart of science even back then. Animal Testing started about 1000 years ago, and it is still used today in today's science (" Animal Testing"). One of the first animal experimentation was from around 450 B.C from a Greek Philosopher Alcmaeon ("Animal Testing"). Animal testing is one of the many ways to find out side effects and solutions to many drugs, medicines and diseases. More than 100 million animals are locked alone in a cage. Doing tests and being forced to take medicines, chemicals and be taken in for experiments (Goodman). Even though the animals might suffer from the drugs and medication, they are used to solve and help cure various diseases.

Animal testing, also known as “animal experimentation”, has been used throughout history. The early Greek physicians, including Erasistratus and Aristotle, used animals in experiments as early as 384 BC. Animal testing is the experimentation on species other than humans for research purposes. Animal testing is used in a variety of ways including the making of cosmetics and personal products to the development of procedures and medications for use in the medical profession. I believe that animal testing in general is wrong and there can be alternatives.

Animals have suffered as a result for thousands of years. However, there is no longer a need to involve the use of animals in experimentation, as there are different techniques that would produce more generalizable results to humans (e.g. in-vitro cultures). It has been shown that a small percentage of successful trials involving animal testing actually lead to the observation of those same results in human trials. For this reason, animal testing should not be used in scientific experimentation, as there are superior alternatives that avoid the suffering experienced by animals, without losing any progress on medical

Therefore, animals should not be used for animal research. Animals suffer emotionally experimenters waste their lives when they do nothing and they do not even improve human health. Society should get rid of animal testings because people are basically murdering these animals. They did nothing to anyone, but yet they kill them for no reason. Researchers waste their money and time on “finding cures” but yet they are killing others’ lives while they are at it. Society must figure out another way to research medical testings on

Animal testing has been happening for decades. It has lead to medical discoveries such as the discovery of penicillin. It seems vital. However, there have been many technological advances during the past years that have as much accuracy as animal testing. While some believe that animal research is vital, it shouldn’t be continued because technological simulations can replace animal testing and most animal experiments taking place now don’t improve human health.

Animals have been used all throughout history to test the effectiveness of medicines. Rachel Hajar discusses the history of this controversial issue. Early Greek scientists performed various experiments on animals to advance their understanding of anatomy, physiology, and other sciences. Some scientists even performed surgical procedures on animals before performing them on humans. Based on this history, we can say that it is necessary to preform experiments to advance knowledge, although those against animal testing claim the benefit to humans does not justify the harm to animals.

Experimenting on animals is a traditional practice in many fields of science although as times have changed it is time to start question the necessity and reliability of animal experiments. Very few tests conducted on animals actually benefit people, meaning the loss of countless animal lives with no substantial benefit to humanity. According to Andrew Rowan, “In 2004, a report by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration noted that 92 percent of new drug entities were failing during human clinical trials either because the new drugs were not effective in humans (having shown promise in animals) or because they were associated with unexpected toxicity (having been demonstrated to be safe in animals)” (2015). The fact that countless experiments lead to no progress forward in terms of benefitting people it reasonable to do away with it entirely and seek alternative methods. In his article author Andrew Rowan looks forward to an age free of animal testing that will be more cost effective and beneficial than testing on animals. It is clear that if it is resulting in hardly any value to society other than trivial aspects like patience that can be achieved through less morally corrupt ways, using animals for experimentation goes against the rights they deserve to

The California Biomedical Research Association claims that almost every scientific and medical breakthrough in the last century has resulted directly from animal testing. By testing on a dogs pancreas the how saved my patients with diabetes. Around 26 million animals are used yearly in the US for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are being used to check the safety of products designed for human use and develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, and other medical, commercial, and health care uses. Research and experimenting on living animals has been practiced all the way back to 500 BC. Supporters of animal testing say that it has led to the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals in the past and that there is no replacement better than actually researching a complete living organism, and the strict regulations are put in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, those alternative methods are available to researchers and can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals usually yields irrelevant data and results but that is just an assumption and not a fact.