In the contemporary society, unethical and illegitimate activities within organisations are

Sometimes rationalization means a way someone justifies their action. You might take the last piece of chocolate cake because, gosh darn it, you wanted it, but you justify it with the rationalization that "it was just going to go to waste."

The purpose of this easy is to argue whether a company support a ‘Whistle-blower’ policy by considering five different types of concepts of ethic: Utilitarianism, The Kantian Ethics theory, Ethics of Justice, Virtue Ethics and Ethics of Justice.

Within a competitive world, companies should become ethical throughout many perspectives. Ethics refers to the standards of right and wrong in an attempt to influence behaviour. (Kinicki 2015, p.83) In stating this, companies can be ethical within numerous occasions such as ethics and financial performance, ethical performance, ethics and sustainability and ethical competition such as competitive advantage. Despite the positive side, there are also some negative implications towards ethics.

If the CEO received a report of his misconduct, the business would surely fall as the boss was the key person who kept the business running steadily. Most often, this event can cause massive damage to employee’s salaries, and affect the economic values as well. Furthermore, one may argue that whistleblowing may violate individual rights as employee’s signed a contract abiding by company’s standard. In an article called “Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibilities” by Sissela Bok, she emphasizes “employees have a loyalty oath of confidentiality and secrecy” (Bok 178) which may violate human rights as well. Individuals often view that they often have the right to privacy. However, whistleblowing to the company can create a breach in loyalty. Similar to a friend posting every secret about the person, employers contain information to avoid mass media and future damages to the community. Therefore, whistleblowing may create further chaos and future problems. While whistleblowing has its flaws regarding the standards placed on the employee, moral and ethical rights are higher than what an employer can offer for their

With the globalization of businesses and corporate governances dealing with the rights of shareholders, and technology making it easier to get information about business practices are all drivers to make ethical behavior in businesses all the more important. Not to mention, unethical behavior has an enormous cost that impacts the respectability of businesses because information is widely available on the Internet, television, and newspapers that potential customers and investors can easily find. Together with strict laws as government, corporations and citizens demand morally respectable business practices or they will not invest in that particular

The twentieth President of the United States once said: “The truth will set you free, but first it will make you miserable” (Quotes, 2008). When there is wrongful doing, illegal activity, or unethical behavior happening within a government industry or business it can be difficult to bring this information out in to the open for the public to know. Whistleblowers have the difficult ethical responsibility, with a lot of scrutiny that happens as well, when telling the truth about their findings about a company that is not doing the right thing. Whistleblowing can create a variety of feelings and ethical perspectives for all that might be involved or even just witness the process unfold and

The corruption rate in a community that does not support or protect reporting illegal activities is significantly high. Employees who work in public or private organizations are the first to identify wrongdoings in a workplace since they have up-to-date information. Whistleblowing can be an essential tool to identify and report these actions in the public, private and non-profit sectors. However, by revealing wrongdoings, whistleblowers often take high personal risks. Lacking strong legal protection might increase the change of facing dismissal, harassment and other forms of retaliation (“Whistleblower protection”, 2012).

Whistleblowing can be a major issue for private organizations who may bend or break the rules to get an upper hand in the business world. This can be a key threat to both every day employees as well as middle and upper management level positions. The two articles being looked at for this argument are both one that supports whistleblowing in the workplace as well as another article that argues against whistleblowing. The article supporting whistleblowing is titled “Why are there so few whistleblowers? Blame evolution,” and is written by Paul Rauwolf and Dominic Mitchell, who have both earned their PhD’s from the University of Bath. The article was published in the Washington Post. The theory that most supports this article are the ideas of Kant. The title of the article against whistleblowing is titled “Why Are Some Whistleblowers Vilified and Others Celebrated?” The article is written by David M. Mayer, he is a writer for the Harvard Business Review. This article was published by the Harvard Business Review. The theory supporting this article is utilitarianism, this can be seen through the importance of doing what is best for everyone involved, not just yourself. The third theory that can be argued is the idea of W.D. Ross and his prima facia duties. The concept of whistleblowing can be a touchy subject in the professional world, but it can be a vital towards promoting a healthy and stable work environment. The

Organizations that encourage a culture of whistleblowing by their employees have been known to be more transparent characterized by free employee communication and trust. The benefit of this is that wrongs can be easily detected, and it also promotes an ethical work environment (Berry, 2004).However, whistleblowing is not an easy thing that anyone can do especially in an organization. It always come with consequences that may not only affect the whistleblower but often those he cares deeply about such as spouse and

Whistle blowing is an attempt of an employee or former employee of a company to reveal what he or she believes to be a wrongdoing in or by a company or organization. Whistle blowing tries to make others aware of practices that are considered illegal or immoral. If the wrongdoing is reported to someone in the company it is said to be internal. Internal whistle blowing tends to do less damage to the company. There is also external whistle blowing. This is where the wrongdoing is reported to the media and brought to the attention of the public. This type of whistle blowing tends to affect the company in a negative way because of bad publicity. It is said that whistle blowing is personal if the wrongdoing affects the

In this essay i will include examples of unethical behaviours done by companies, ethical and unethical activities and illustrate it.

A recent study conducted in 2010 among UK and some European companies, revealed that the most prominent ethical issues to organisations includes harassment, bribery, corruption and facilitation payments, and whistle blowing (Wesley et al. 2011). Thus, it is important that ethics must indeed embark from the top. Leaders cannot escape from their responsibility to establish a moral example for their followers. The ethical actions and behaviour of top management have to be consistent with their teaching, otherwise formal ethical training and codes are bound to have a slim chance of success. The outcome of organisational goals is dependent on the leader’s

At some point in time, many people are faced with the possibility of unethical companies, they have decided to follow or unethical business practices. These methods give a dirty business, as we are dealing with may be involved in making some very difficult decisions. In some cases, we need to expose the unethical business practices, so that the outside world knows what happing. The thing is that every company adheres to the rules. Below we provide a legal basis, and in words, and in some cases help to understand business methods are more immoral.

Research speaks out that the person who blows the whistle is basically a trusted loyal employee. Also indicates chances that the person is a role model employee. It is the employees who have the responsibility to act ethically when he comes across evidence of such an unethical activity being done in the organization.

We have heard the well-used phrase, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do,” and have applied it well as we travel among other countries and cultures, with great success. However, in business, it does not prove to be as much of a reliable phrase to live by. General practices of businesses can sometimes prove to be unethical, even though they are quite legal, or were simply unethical in their conduct and operations, with no remorse. Unethical practices by businesses have often been a catalyst in their demise. Hence, for business success, we might say, “When in business, practicing integrity is good business,” because if it is adhered to, it can be a recipe for success.