Inclusivity That Defines The Nature Of Modern Leadership

1542 Words Nov 12th, 2015 7 Pages
inclusivity that defines the nature of modern leadership. The author centers his argument on self-practices and individual achievements, leaving behind the contributions by other stakeholders within the organization. Though he states that it is critical to have an insight on the views of others and accept correction of mistakes, the author does not outline the role of leadership in convincing the organization when in times of a crisis.
In light of the above arguments, certain questions fail to find answers both in the book and in the classroom lectures. First, what is the role of leadership in guiding organizational change? This question revolves around the need to initiate organizational change due to such factors as operational inefficiencies, increased competition, and managerial bureaucracies.
Literature review of the research and theories in the book
Principally, the literature review involved in the book revolves around sports and excellence in coaching. This section involves the literate related to the position held by the author of the book, which forms the basis of his arguments and the validity of his audience (Wooden & Jamison, 2011).
The author’s depiction of self-efficacy is dependent on the expectancy theories that affect the outcome of athletic performance. Such factors as personal integrity and excellence are pegged on the concept of self-efficacy that defines the author’s depiction of success. The author displays self-efficacy as the belief held by…
Open Document