Income Disparity In Canada Essay

Poverty rates in Canada have not changed since past 2 decades (Lecture slides). Reasons for hope starts off with Canada's federal and provincial government anti-poverty strategies and programs that help people in poverty and has kept poverty rates from being even higher (Raphael, 2011, pg. 439). Every province offers some types of programs that are receptive, which is better than USA, but not comparable to Nordic countries. Hope is also present that political parties such as NDP, BLOC and Liberal will strengthen Canada's government and lead to many more policies which will reduce poverty (Raphael, 2011, pg.459). In addition, Canada still offers a universal healthcare system accessible to everyone, universal child care and free pharmaceutical for elderly (June 15 Lecture). These programs support and set the foundation for those people who are experiencing extreme poverty and those are low income. Canada also offers the Senate report, House of Commons report and Campaign 2000 report to raise awareness, keep track of rate of poverty and provide recommendations (June 15 Lecture). Health units in Ontario also add on to hope, they provide community health programs, disease prevention strategies and promote healthy lifestyles (June 15 Lecture). These health units are located in many cities such as York

In today’s society it is unfortunate to say that a person’s income does reflect their value to society. Classism, it affects all of us. The government has classified you based on your yearly income. For example; if your income is between $18,000 - $23,000 you are classifed as a lower class Canadian. If your income is between $35,000 - $55,000 you are the average middle class Canadian. To be classified as an upper class Canadian your income would need to be anything above $55,000. The government has also classified those with combined income so if you are common - law, or married. Have you ever wondered why a doctor gets paid more than a construction worker? A doctor gets paid roughly $360,000 a year compared to the $63,000 a year income a

The issue of economic inequality has ruined the economy of the United States completely. This issue is making its way to Canada, which is causing more of its citizens to go into poverty. When this problem first started to arise, it was strongly ignored by the government because they believed it would not cause a problem. However, over the past twenty years, it has increased rapidly which caused the gap between rich and poor to became enormous. Moreover, the wealth of the rich strongly depends on the disadvantage of the poor. The only way the rich will stay rich is if the poor stay poor. The top one percent of Canadians receive 318,000 dollars on average whereas the bottom ninety percent receive only 28,000 dollars. If the poor start getting high

Duffy and Mandell portray many themes around poverty in their article “poverty in Canada”, but there is one word that really symbolizes the main theme, and

In the article, “The Case For Free Money: Why Don’t We Have Universal Basic Income,” James Surowiecki presents the benefits of a universal basic income and why it is appealing to workers and politicians. After an experiment, known as “Mincome,” implanted universal basic income in Dauphin during the 1970s, evidence clearly shows that the Canadian town received remarkable advantages, such as lowered dropout rates and hospitalization rates. The idea of universal basic income is not new, however, it is regaining popularity. Contrary to popular belief, some from both the Democratic and Republican parties support assured basic income, Surowiecki claims. The current push for universal basic income is emboldened by the rising concern of advancing

Canada is one of the wealthiest countries in the world, however, many citizens are below the blurred poverty line. (251). The poverty line in Canada is measured by the LICO-IAT (boooook) and the MBM (253). The resources for those below the poverty line are very poor; food banks and shelters are unable to uphold the amount of people that are in need of them. (252). Among the poor, many people have paid employment, however, it is not enough.

According to this weeks readings and lecture, I learn more about the history of Canada’s labour movement in the 19th and 20th century. As a developed country, I did not realize that there are such uneven developments in Canada. Canada is a well developed country and doing well about social welfare on my mind. Compare the wages of labours between Canadian and Chinese, Canadian labours have higher paid and minimum wages ensure their basic cost of living. In China minimum wages does not exists and labours do not have movement because of the state system and polity. Canadian labours dare to protect their interests by movements. These movements show that problems exists between the poor and wealthy in Canada. The problems come from different classes

Yet, Yalnizyan’s analysis did end here, the wealthiest 0.1% of tax fillers consists of 24,600 Canadians who have a minimum income of $621,300 and an average of $1.49 million (2010, 12). In 2007, this accounted for 5.5% of total income in Canada (Yalnizyan 2010, 12). However, Yalnizyan points out a greater concentration of wealth, 2,500 people in 2007, made a minimum of $1.845 million and an average of $3.833 million, this group accounts for 2.6% of total Canadian income (2010, 12). No other category of income in Canadian history has seen growth at such an explosive pace, being more than quintupled since 1982 (Yalnizyan 2010,

Gender inequality, by definition, refers to “unequal treatment or perceptions of individuals wholly or partly due to their genders” (Wikipedia, 2017). Canada has progressed towards gender equality in multiple aspects; however, there are many areas within Canada in which women are still oppressed due to their gender. For instance, Canadian women in the work force are treated unequally in contrast to men in regards to opportunity, advancement, and salary. It is due to lack of equality within the work field that Canada still requires feminism.

Explore our economic history so as to understand the evolution the Canadian “labour market” – the development of capitalism, the rise of Fordism, and the neo-liberal assault on working people which rolled back the gains of the post-war era.

Through the on-going and persistent support of organizations and various advocates towards increased access to post-secondary education, the Ontario government has introduced an alternative policy that results in the recreation and reinforcement of neoliberalism and the dominant discourses that prevent society from dismantling structural inequalities. Michael J. Prince proposes, “A notable feature of the Canadian political landscape is the presence of and interplays between the dominant discourses of neoliberalism and an alternative discourse of social liberalism, variants of both of which are expressed by different interests, groups and social movements (2012, p. 487-488). In essence, organizations such as Fight the Fees, work in multiples

While elites take up a large percentage of Canadian’s annual household income, their businesses also provide the country with employment and market investment. This forces the government to value the presence of these stakeholders, and support systems such as the CCPC. While previous political party platforms have attempted to raise taxes, elites have been quick to threaten to uproot business within the country (Osberg, 2015). This entraps the government to continue to support these schemes, or leaving the lower class jobless.

Rice, J. J., & Prince, M. J. (2013). Changing politics of Canadian social policy. University of Toronto Press.

The economic inequality of women’s precarity contributes to an even greater issue, their social inequality. The labour market and neoliberalism, in conjunction with economic austerity and an extreme decrease in social welfare initiatives (all factors in precarity), contribute to the social exclusion of women in Canada. Social exclusion - the division between the haves and the have-nots - is spawned from the barriers (“socioeconomic disparities”) that prevent individuals or groups full participation in the social workings of society, and women experience it relative to their level of

Basic income has been an increased topic of debate in Canada during the last decades. Basic income is a form of social security that grants all citizens an unconditional income. Tony Fitzpatrick, a PhD on the topic of basic income (1999), claims that the radical right is a strong opposer to basic income because of their belief that basic income maintains a high possibility for abuse. In contrast, Daniel Raventós (2007) , a professor of the department of sociological theory at the faculty of economics and business at the University of Barcelona , claims that the left supports adopting a basic income policy because they believe that it would efficiently reduce poverty gaps . I argue that employing a basic income in Canada would serve the country positively by giving individuals a chance to get back on their feet, countering the radical right ideologies that basic income is just a chance for individuals to abuse the system. This paper will first examine the issues from an economic perspective. It will then examine the social benefits and possible downfalls of a basic income. Finally, it will evaluate basic income from individual political agendas.