Indentured Servants Dbq

The black slaves resisted and tried to run away they wouldn’t give up. Even though there was laws in trying to stop the blacks from running away, they still ran away. There were laws made that if anyone were to find black slave they should do to them what they feel be appropriate. Man slaves were killed or burnt in the book there was a case were a black slave was burnt in a slow fire for 8-10 hours. In some cases both white and black slaves ran way together but the punishment wouldn’t be the same white would only extend there period of serving as slaves and the black salves were hanged or killed. Even then they could see racism how the whites that committed the same crime would get treated differently then the black slaves. The black salves couldn’t do anything besides being slaves, so thought the white people. Even the white servants were treated different, not only were they working for a set period of time, but they were treated as humans and they had rights, and would receive land and pay at the end of their term. The white people justified their own slave trade because in Africa slavery existed too. This was

“Virginia Laws Governing Servant and Slave” reveals the rebellions of servants and slaves who united to fight against their masters. Bacon’s Rebellion, in 1676, occurred in the Virginia Colony in opposition to Virginia's Indian policy (Roark, The American Promise, p. 79). Bacon’s Rebellion demonstrated that poor whites and poor blacks could be united in a cause, and it shows that they are capable of challenging the ruling class together. Virginia lawmakers enacted the laws to prevent the servants and slaves from uniting to fight against masters. According to "Document 2: Law Making Slave Status Inherited from Mother, 1662" the Virginia legislators punished interracial sexual relations, "And that if any Christian shall commit fornication with a negro man or woman, hee or shee soe offending shall pay double the ffines imposed by the former act"

He notes that, the slavery institution made them forget about their origin, and anything else that entails their past, and even when they were born. The slaves forgot everything about their families, and none knew about their family because, they were torn from them without any warning. Douglass explains how they went without food, clothing and even sleep because their masters were cruel to them. American slavery took advantage of black laborers as they were beaten mercilessly without committing any offense. They were not treated as human beings, but as property that could be manipulated in any way. The slavery institution was harsh for the Africans especially women who were regularly raped, and forced to bear their masters children and if they declined, they were maimed or killed.

4) Slavery was justified by racial ideology. Consider three texts, including one that was written by a former slave. How do the authors either replicate or refute racial ideologies common in the nineteenth century?

Also, it quotes “But, it is better to die as free men, than to live as slaves,” that is saying that living as a slave is not glorious at all as it would be to be living as a free man in the united states. The evidence that can be used to support my subclaim from document 4 is “He shall be free to live, and to thrive, if he can,” This evidence supports my subclaim because when it quotes “and to thrive, if he can,” it shows that they don't believe that he could succeed. It also shows that the non-minorities don’t want him to be free and only want to use them for work and labor. When Analysing document 2 it’s source seems to be very reliable due to the fact that it was quoted by a person who was enslaved and escaped from slavery. However, that does not mean it it is 100% reliable, that maybe because the person who could have quote that

Note to the wise: Look at the content of the documents, the place at which the document originated, and the time at which the document was written. Also consider who wrote the document and how that individual feels about the institution of slavery.

They show a newspaper article displayed by a slave owner, that a Negro-man, who did white washing and fishing for money, was not providing the money to his owner and so the owner posted that no one was to hire him and that they would be prosecuted by law if they did. In the journal of Charles Wesley he describes the brutal whipping and maiming and killing of slaves, and was outraged by the fact that these atrocities were done and the only penalty was a payment of seven pounds and half that amount, if the master turned himself in.(cite). From these documents we see the absolute disregard of a slave being a human person. They were an object of use and nothing more. All codes were written for the slave owner and never for the

Aslop was an indentured servant for four years and instead of viewing it as enslavement he viewed it as simply serving because he was more focused on the benefits and not the circumstances. For example, “And what’s a four year’s Servitude to advantage a man all the remainder of his dayes, making his predecessors happy in his sufficient abilities, which he attained to partly by the restrainment of so small a time?” (Aslop, 2) Nonetheless, I have to keep in mind that what they experienced were in different locations (Virginia/Maryland). For instance, according to Aslop Maryland had it easier compared to other colonies, “For know, That the Servants here in Mary-Land of all Colonies, distant or remote Plantations, have the least cause to complain, either for strictness of Servitude, want of Provisions, or need of Apparel” (Aslop, 3).

Indentured servants came to America from Europe in search of land, work, increased wages, and religious freedom. However, the colonies expanded so rapidly, labor became scarce. This led to a greater import of Europeans willing to begin a new life in the New World, in exchange for their servitude for a contracted period (O 'Brien & Sparrow, 2014). When labor contracts ended and freed servants received their land, servitude needed to continue with farms and business operation. With scarce labor, Indians became the new target. Captured and forced into servitude by colonials, the Indians filled the gaps in the colonial workforce to repay debt. The Indians eventually revolted and went on murderous adventures against the white man, leading to the expulsion of slave labor trade and outlawing independent trading in the Southeastern states (Shi & Tindall, 2012).

Define Indentured Servants. How were indentured servants brought over to the 13 Colonies? Why were indentured servants needed more in the Southern Colonies?

treatment was different for servants and slaves. Being black meant being treated differently then others. a 1639 virginia law allowed for everyone except negroes to have arms and ammunition. This meant that an indentured servant who was sold and forced to do labor had this right whereas slaves did not. Indentured servants suffered because of all the diseases the ship contained and because the horrible quality of food and water. Servants had a tiny toom that was 6 feet in length and two feet wide. besides food rationing servants had

People were running to America from England due to the religious intolerances and harassment; political turmoil and military drafts. So to leave often someone would agree with a land owner in america to be an indentured servant in turn for the land owner to pay their passage over to the new land. Said person then would willingly work for several years until their time was up and then they were free to go on about their life. The second group of people most commonly traveling from England to America were criminals. In England the penalty for crime was death, so it became practice for the king to pardon them as long as they agreed to leave the country.

I find your points very fascinating and interesting, especially towards the end of your post. Of course your points in the beginning of your posts, where you believed that it would be preferable to be an indentured servant rather than a slave, I agree with wholeheartedly. It's pretty clear that the rest of the students in this course agree with it as well, having read most of the original posts and replies to them, there doesn't seem to be very much differentiation in it, which sometimes makes it difficult to have a discussion or reply on a post, because one doesn't want to just reiterate the same idea or post that one is replying to, or simply feel like one is echoing everyone else's thoughts. However, perhaps the fact that we all agree is a good thing and a sign that, especially in the 21st Century in the United States, it's a positive aspect and result and sign that so many of us agree that slavery was horrible, awful, and unjust, and the thought or idea that a lifetime of servitude and harsh mistreatment of not only yourself, but also your family and even your children, is reprehensible, shows the progress we have made over the past few centuries in our country and

In these letters I see that the servants have a really rough time. They talk about sickness and how they feel weak and still have to work from sun up until sun down. They also mention that they had every little to eat. Slavery didn’t come with sex or age they mostly took anyone into slavery it didn’t matter to these people.

The two forms of involuntary labor were great asset to communities but the system of slavery was more established in state affairs and issues surrounding the practice debated on both sides. Slaves were victims of lifelong hereditary services which spikes the significant difference between indentured servants. Unlike indentured servants, who could negotiate their service, as described in the account of Mittelberger, slavery had no terms of signed contracts. An indentured servant had rooms to bargain, refuse and accept a buyer’s offer and was entitled to certain provision once a contract finish. As Mittelberger explains, “he or she is entitled to a new suit of cloths at parting;…a man gets, in addition, a horse, a women and a cow” (89). However,