Independence of External Auditor

The factor that plays the greatest role in determining auditor independence is independence in mind. Auditors may or may not appear to be independent, but if the auditor is truly independent in mind, then the auditor can remain objective and unbiased. The profession should consider tightening the Code of Professional Conduct to address the issue of an audit team member knowing a close friend that holds any position at the audit client. If this scenario arises, the firm can still audit the client, but the audit member with the close relationship won’t be able to be on the audit team.

Auditor Independence contains 9 parts which stablish standards for external auditor independence, so it will have limit conflicts of interest, also contains that an approval requirements for new auditor, audit partner rotation, and auditor reporting requirements. Also restrict auditing organization from providing non audit services for the same clients they audit.

Legitimacy in accounting practices is ensured by the check and balance of having independent auditors from registered public accountant firms reviewing financial practices. The report features eleven sections and these sections pertain to accounting overview, independence of auditors to reduce interest conflicts, corporate responsibility, financial disclosures, tax returns, criminal fraud and various elements of white collar criminal activity (107th Congress

According to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), The primary objective and responsibilities of auditor is to express an opinion on the fairness with which all financial statement including all of its (material aspects, financial position, the result of the company operation and its overall level of cash flows) AU Suction 110. Thus, what this means is that auditor must be fully independent and must be fully able and willing to apply professional judgment as it relates to the audit engagement under consideration.

In October 2001, Enron Corporation which was one of the world major energy, commodities and service companies with claimed revenues of nearly 111 billion dollars during 2000 collapsed under the weight of massive fraud in that it has become largest bankruptcy recognition in the US economy. Enron’s earning report was extremely skewed that losses were not represented in their entirety, prompting more and more wishing to participate in what seemed like a profitable company. After collapse of Enron, Auditor independence has become a social issue that weather auditor has to be independent or not. In addition, while auditing must consider matters objectively with dispassion, there were still doubts whether it implemented well. Further, there has been much speculation about the need for the mandatory rotation of auditors or audit firm rotation to warn false accounting between audit firm and client. By examining Enron case, this essay will discuss about advantages and drawbacks of the mandatory rotation of

An auditor’s role in an audit is very important. An auditor must be able to collect enough evidence to supports their finding, and also be on the lookout for fraud. Company’s may or may not know the law, but it is the job to know the law, and be able to educate and report findings properly. Since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, there have been provisions that have directly affected auditors. This paper will include the details of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, how ethics and independence have affected auditors, as well implementation of new standards based on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

If the auditors of today followed the same rules they did in Great Britain during the 19th century, then America would be in trouble. With such a competitive and strong capitalistic market, it would be hard to not be tempted to alter the financial statements of publically traded companies if there were no independence standards. Today’s business world obviously holds independence of auditors to be important or else Michael Goodbread would have never been investigated by the SEC.

This means that the main goals of the act in enhancing auditor independence in preventing fraud in future are faced with pressures regarding its efficiency. Case 3 Effective fraud control depends on prevention of the following three weaknesses in the internal control system. First is the static nature of internal controls. This means that internal controls might not be fluid in terms of evolution with the changes experienced in technology, business and the fraud environment. Second is the immunity of the internal control systems. For instance, if a company’s internal control system has weak control policies for its procedures and processes, then the company becomes a target for both internal and external criminal activities. Thirdly, are unclear definitions of the roles and responsibilities of ownership. By this it means that if the internal control system is not well defined to the employees, then there will be an assumption that the role of the internal controls is to only perform audits hence they would not be interested in preventing fraudulent

The last aspect, programming independence, covers the need of the auditor to have absolutely no interference from their audit client in how the audit is run. An audit client cannot attempt to control any aspects of the audit such as changing or restricting any procedures an auditor may want to perform. The audit client may not try to control any of the audit work and may not put any type of restrictions on how many auditors may come to the location to perform fieldwork.

Independence is extremely important, necessary, and appropriate because without an independent IAD, IAD’s objective of adding values and improving business operations cannot be achieved. Independence is also a key component in Attribute Standard. Accountability section states the chief audit executive’s responsibility to the management and audit committee. It is necessary and appropriate because it leads to significant communication between the CAE and top management and between the CAE and the Board; it also helps ensure that the standards and requirement of the internal auditing function is achieved.

The issue of independence is another reason why companies choose to have an external audit done. Independence refers to when different employees perform different tasks within a specific department. We will use the accounts receivable section of the accounting department as an example. For independence to occur, a company would want to have separate employees collecting cheques and/or cash, preparing the deposit, and actually depositing the cheques and/or cash. For some companies, usually smaller ones,

According to ICAEW, auditor independence mainly refers to the independence of the external auditor from parties that have an interest in the financial statements of the business being audited. It requires having both integrity and an objective manner to the auditing process. In order for the concept to be deemed effective the auditor needs to carry out their work freely. One of the main purposes of auditing is to increase credibility of the entity’s’ financial statements, as they have expressed their own professional opinion on the truth and fair view in accordance with the proper accounting standards used. This is only possible if the audit is made with reasonable assurance that it has come from an independent source and has not been influenced by other parties, such as managers, directors or by conflict of interest.

Internal auditors cannot effectively provide an analysis on the company’s internal dealings as they are part of the company. External auditors, however, can observe these processes from the outside and then determine where the funds of the company and whether the dealings adhere to the regulations. Using external auditors in a company prevents conflict of interest from happening. Conflict of interest is a situation where an individual or organization has multiple interests and of those multiple interests, one could possible corrupt the motivation for an act on the other when the auditor has any kind of beneficial interest in their client’s performance. In other circumstances, there is also the threat of familiarity where auditors become

The lack of independence for external auditors will lead to the neglect of auditing risks (William R.K., 2003), which are the main reasons for the failure of certified accountants and professional accounting organizations. The consequence of the external auditors deprived of independence would be very serious. And there are many cases, which aroused by the failure of external auditors and most are related to the lack of independence. One famous example is the bankruptcy of Enron and the role played by its external auditor, Arthur Andersen (Todd, S., 2003). Arthur Andersen was once one of the biggest accounting companies in the world, and was canceled for the involvement in the Enron bankruptcy scandal.

This paper critically analyses the independence of the internal audit function through its relationship with management and the audit committee. Given the growing role of internal auditing in contemporary corporate governance and independence has gained renewed attention.