Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq Essay

In 1830, the Jackson administration instated the Indian Removal Act. This act removed the Native Americans from their ancestral lands to make way for an increase of additional American immigrants. This act forced many Native American tribes from their homes including five larger tribes, Cherokees, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Creek, and Seminole. These tribes had populations were estimated to be around 65,000 people strong that lived in North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi. (Foner, 2012) The American Indians fought for their rights and beliefs through the American court system. Their other objective other than fighting for their rights was but in the end, they were forced out of their homes to move

Gold was discovered near Cherokee territory in Georgia. As result, Georgia desired to remove the Cherokees and relocate the Cherokees to lands west of the Mississippi river. This struck a major debate. Andrew Jackson was known to support the removal of Native Americans, so the state of Georgia took advantage of the scenario. With little difficulty, the Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830. The Cherokees did not relocate without a civilized fight. They sent several documents to Congress to argue their case. These documents included three arguments to support the sovereignty of the Cherokee nation. These three arguments were Great Britain saw the Cherokees as separated nation from the Colonists, George Washington saw them as an independent nation, and the Cherokees had the same natural rights as the United States.

While the government may have been thinking for the betterment of their people, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not a justified action. The settlers bullied and attacked the original inhabitants, the Indians, into giving up their land. Perhaps to the government this may have seemed justified considering it was beneficial to them, but they essentially stole land that was not theirs to take. In an attempt to feign compassion for these original inhabitants, President Andrew Jackson states in his 1829 case to congress that this Act will help the Indians, “…to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community” (Jackson, First Annual Message to Congress, 2).

In the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia ordered a cruel battle to remove the Cherokees, who held dominion within the borders of Georgia, North Carolina, Alabama, and Tennessee at the time. In 1827 the Cherokees fixed an basic government. The Cherokees were not only reshuffling their government but also declaring to the American public that they were a free nation that could not be removed without their permission. An angry Georgia legislature responded by intending to extend its authority over the Cherokees living in the states declared boundaries. The state took over the Cherokee lands; overthrew their government, courts, and laws; and settled a process for snatching Cherokee land and distributing it to the state's white citizens. In 1830 reps from Georgia and the other southern states pushed through Congress the Indian Removal Act, which gave U.S. president Andrew Jackson the ability to debate removal treaties with the Native American tribes.

There were several motives for the removal of the Indians from their lands, to include racism and land lust. Since they first arrived, the white Americans hadn’t been too fond of the Native Americans. They were thought to be highly uncivilized and they had to go. In his letter to Congress addressing the removal of the Indian tribes, President Jackson

Once at the highest court available in the State, the Cherokee had kept with their rhetoric that they were not wishing to attack the Europeans or those living near them. They only wished to have the promise of the government that they made to not encroach onto their lands and then everyone can

The Indian removal act of 1830 significantly impacted the Native American Indians negatively because of the false promise that was made about the relocation, The death’s of many Indians, and The US telling lies about their new home.

People being forced off their land for gold and riches was very cruel and was the basis for the creation of the Indian Removal Act. The Indian Removal Act was created on May 28, 1830, by president Jackson. It stated that all southern Indian tribes were to be moved to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their ancestral homelands. Even though some Indians left peacefully some tribes had to leave with force. The Act of 1830 had a huge impact on all Indians. The Removal Act was strongly supported in the South in order to gain access to lands inhabited by the five Indian tribes. On the other hand, the Indians weren’t very fond of this act and started to not like the Americans. The U.S government thought that the movement

Gold was discovered near Cherokee territory in Georgia. As a result, Georgia desired to remove the Cherokees and relocate the Cherokees to lands that are west of the Mississippi River. This struck a major debate. Andrew Jackson was known to support the removal of Native Americans, so the state of Georgia took advantage of the scenario. With little difficulty, the Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830. The Cherokees did not relocate without resistance. They sent several documents to Congress to argue their case. These documents included three arguments to support the sovereignty of the Cherokee nation. These three arguments were the Cherokees had natural rights to their inherited lands, Great Britain saw

Some may argue that it is unfair of them to be required to leave their comfy home and civilization ; however, once they move they are allowed to govern themselves again, as long as they remain within that territory. If the Cherokee were to move they will given the 70,000 acres, that would add up to about 1 acre, or 15 minutes of walking until reaching the property line per tribe member. As stated in the Article, Move the Cherokee to Indian Territory, “it is good land, on the banks of two major rivers that join the Mississippi River”. Not only will they have the space to build, then everything they do build will be covered by the $5 million from the

Is when president Andrew Jackson order the army of the U.S to remove the Cherokee Indian out of their land. there were 7,000 solder that moved the Indians to their land too Oklahoma in 1835. how could the native could stop it from happening. this is what General Winfield Scott said to the Natives "this is no sudden determination on the part of the whom you and I must now obey by the treaty"( Gen.Winfield Scott's Address to the Cherokee Nation in 1835). if the Indian had sing the treat the thy would still have time. Then the other reason in that the u.s gave the native two years to move but the didn't move because the had hop. the way the could stop the is that they could in the summer time so they could died from the cold weather in the 1835. many of the native would be alive if they had move in a good

Quick! Imagine a life of an Indian and how it felt, it was probably nice to have freedom. Well it wasn’t nice!!! At least for the Indians, the Georgians were forcing the Cherokee to leave their land or live under their laws. But, the Cherokee (one of the Indians tribes) they refused to leave their land and live under the laws of America. The Indians/ Cherokee, did mass murdered the U.S., but the U.S. took their land. The U.S. broken treaties between them and cheated them on trades, they also killed many of their men, women, and children. So they're only retaliating for what the U.S did to them. The Indian Removal Act wasn’t justified because the Americans took their land, killed their men, women, children, they have broken treaties and cheated them on trades.

Due to the fact that this land has been the Cherokee’s for hundreds of years, they should not have been forced to leave.

Throughout the debate of The Indian Removal Act in the congress, many strong and valid arguments were made. For instance, the Cherokee group launched an attack to the Andrew Jackson Administration group by querying the reasons of why they broke the treaty. The Andrew Jackson Administration remained calm and they explained that the reason why that broke the treaty is solely for the betterment of the U.S.; they argued that the importance of the nation’s economy growth outweighed the trust and friendship with

On the other hand, the Americans were pushing the Indians as hard as they could to the Western half of North America ( North America being divided by the Mississippi). They wanted to settle the Eastern portion of "their" land without the Indians revolting, getting in the way with their religions, and stirring up the general racism that the majority of the white settlers possessed in that time period. Basically, the whites did not want the Indians to live among them or near them, and the Indians did not want to simply give up their land and move hundreds of miles away. In the late 1700's and early portion of the 1800's, the Americans practiced an "unwritten removal policy", of unfairly acquiring Native American land, destroying Indian tribes, and forcing Natives to recede into the depths of the land they have lived upon for thousands of years. The Indians put up quite a resistance for a few hundred years, but the time had finally arrived when the whites were seriously thinking about passing a bill through their Congress that would demand that all Native Americans move on the Western side of the Mississippi River. For the Americans, influential scholars, military heroes, and religious leaders each had his own opinion on whether they had the right to pass a rather finalizing law on such a major issue. Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, which in short gives Americans the "legal" right to force Indians out of their present