Introduction
The authors of this study are interested in physiological dependencies that may contribute to behaviors associated with indoor tanning. The authors are looking at mood-based motivations that may be predictors of the in-door continued use. The authors were interested in developing a more reliable, valid, tool that could be used to measue why people use indoor tanning, their intentions and behaviors. Skin cancer is a direct consequence of continued in-door tanning and the authors were interested in providing an instrument health care professionals can use to help people understand their behaviors. Insight can positively impact social change by opening doors for dialogue and communication that reduces the incidences of skin cancer by changing the attitudes and behaviors associated with indoor tanning..
Critique of Article/Research Study
…show more content…
The authors needed to assess the predictive validity of MITS by measureing the extent to which MITS relates to indoor tanning behavior. I believe these test were appropriate because it seemed to effectively narrow down the information to usable data, along with accomplishing the purpose for the study, which seeks to develop and validate the MITS as a psychometric assessment tool to identify those most at risk of indoor tanning dependence and implement more effective interventions among at-risk individuals. For example, 9 potential MITS items were examined using alphamax, a statistical package to identify the most efficient and reliable combination of the items. Also the control theory model of mood regulation summarizes that people are motivated to regulate mood states in a way that maximizes pleasure and minimizes psychological discomfort. These are just a couple of examples why these tests were appropriate and effective in supporting the
Legislation passed a bill regulating minor’s use of tanning beds; however, no limit has been set to regulate the amount of tanning a minor can consume. Due to the high amount of debate on whether there should be regulations on artificial tanning, Donna W. Driscoll, professor at Molloy College, and Jennifer Darcy, clinical instructor, evaluated all fifty states in an online questionnaire regarding restrictions on tanning. The questionnaire included questions regarding the access of tanning beds by minors and legal enforcement issues. The questionnaire scaled the answers of the states on a range of four levels of restriction: zero having no restrictions, less than ten having minimal restrictions, ten to twenty having moderate restrictions, and
Sharon Miller is the author of this article and is part of FDA. In this article she discusses how each type of uv rays damage the skin and which uv ray is used in tanning beds. This is relevant to my topic because it demonstrates the risk of skin cancer. Many people think tanning gives them a ¨healthy¨ glow, but in reality a tan is a sign on skin damage. UV-B rays burn the top layer of skin resulting in a sunburn in most cases. UV-A rays burn into a deeper layer of the skin causing a rash to appear. Tanning beds emit UV-B rays and UV-A rays, which is why you tend to get a sunburn before turning dark. The UV-B rays cause your body to emit more melanin, which is a pigment that darkens the skin. This is why we get tan in the summer whether it
The difference between the sun and a tanning bed are the amount of UVA and UVB rays that are emitted, tanning beds, use fluorescent bulbs that emit predominantly UVA with a small amount of UVB. The Sun emits way more UVB than a tanning bed. The skin cancer foundation said “UVA exacerbates the cancer-causing effects of UVB, and is the main wavelength behind photo-aging…It penetrates more deeply and causes more genetic damage in the skin cells where most skin cancers arise.” On the website “YoExpert” they wrote an easy way to remember the difference between UVA and UVB and their side effects is UVA = Aging UVB= Burn. So if if one was worried about burning in the sun then a tanning bed is the way to go. Bad things are that a tanning bed will make
Tanning salons are required to get a permit from the Department of Health and Environmental Control but should people really trust that? There are also signs everywhere in tanning salons that state that all beds are sanitary but “DHEC openly admits it hasn’t completed routine annual inspections on tanning salons since 2001” (WMBF News Par. 13). The UV light used in the indoor tanning beds can not kill off bacteria alone. With these workers only getting paid minimum wage a lot of them do not put in much effort to fully clean each tanning bed. People can past down many diseases including warts, herpes, athletes foot and lice. There are constantly risks being taken everyday by using tanning beds. There may also be complaints on the cleanliness of the tanning beds that people may not be aware of because tanning salons can
Most people go to salons or anywhere else to get a tan and they will ask “Are tanning beds dangerous?” The employee will probably say no, they are totally safe, but the truth is tanning beds are not safe! Ultra-violet rays from tanning beds are stronger than the sun’s rays. In addition, tanning beds put out fifteen times the radiation given off the sun. Moreover, tan is one’s body response to injury. Therefore, a tan is dangerous to younger people. To add, tanning beds are riskier than sun exposure and cause melanoma. The risk of melanoma goes up by seventy-five percent when one uses a tanning bed. However, not only is one more
There has been speculation that using a tanning bed is the only harmful method to a person’s health, but that is utterly wrong. A tan, whether from a bed, on the beach, or through accidental exposure,
Before one can discuss harmful effects of tanning equipment and increased sun exposure, one must be familiar with the components of ultraviolet light and how affects the skin. Sunlight contains two types of ultraviolet (UV) light: UVA and UVB. UVA rays consist of longer wavelengths that penetrate deep into the dermal layer of skin. Limited exposure to UVA rays causes skin to tan; however, most experts agree that overexposure to UVA can lead to other long-term skin damage. UVB rays’ wavelengths are much shorter, affecting the outermost layers of skin. UVB rays are known as the "burning rays" and are considered more dangerous. Tanning beds and sun lamps generally emit 93% to 99% UVA
Among the general public the use of tanning beds is associated with a variety of health risks. According to Madigan and Lim (2016), some of the risks include an increased occurrence of skin cancers (melanoma and nonmelanoma) and becoming psychologically dependent on using tanning beds. Another interesting health outcome linked to tanning bed use is people who use them tend to participate in “other high-risk health behaviors” (Madigan & Lim, 2016, 640). For the purpose of this paper, I will focus on the skin cancer and high risk behavior outcomes linked with tanning bed use.
A shocking article titled “Alarming Find: 29% of High School Girls Use Tanning Beds” by Liz
Many people think that is it possible to achieve a “healthy tan,” but this thought has been proven wrong. Overexpose to UV-A and UV-B rays from the sun lead to premature aging of the skin, as well as the possible formation of skin cancer, know as melanoma. An appearance of a tan is actually a stage of burning and damage to the skin. Although a tan may be desirable to many, the fact remains that more people need to be educated on the dangers of the sun’s harmful rays, and the possible health complications of overexposure.
The reasoning behind this is because tanning beds are bad for one's skin, health, and no one takes into consideration how much damage they can cause. 35% of all American adults, 59% of college students, 17% of all teens tan, but yet no one seems to realize the damage because it is so easy to become addicted to. “Tanning beds have been declared as carcinogen (cancer-crawling substances). Tanning beds can lead to long term effects like wrinkling in the skin, damage to collagen of skin, cataracts and mutations that impair the DNA’s normal functions. But tanning beds can also lead to eye cancer and damage to the tissue. There are many other things out there that people can use instead of going into a tanning bed and damaging their skin each time they go. They have things such as tanning lotion, creams or sprays that are not harmful to the body. “Endorphins trigger a positive feeling in the body, easily comparable to morphine,” (“Why is tanning dangerous?”) But they’re also short term effects that come along with using tanning beds such as redness of the skin, dark spots, DNA damage, thickening of the epidermis (inflamed or swollen), sunburn or sun
A tanning bed may look very simple, but in reality it is very complicated, for instance, Gamma Rays have frequency’s greater than 3 x 1019, while UV rays have much lower frequency’s, so in a sunbed, if the frequency of UV light increases then it technically becomes Gamma Rays, depending on the amount of radiation that the person is exposed to, he/she might get radiation poisoning if exposed to small amounts of radiation, but if exposed to a large amount, according to a study in 2007 by the Health Physiology, some people have died, either immediately or over time (Kirstin Hendrickson, arch 12 2014). This is why many researchers have studied the tanning beds and have come to a conclusion that UV radiation suits the sunbed the finest. Tanning beds are slowly effecting our society, some of the celebrities use tanning beds before going to a vacation or to look
I do not think that is it a good decision for a person under 18 to use a tanning bed. Personally I enjoy tanning in the indoor salons. I have always thought that even though the UV rays were limited to a shorter length of time of exposure. The exposure is just as concentrated as the normal sun’s rays. We have learned from our text that our bodies require melanin to protect, skin from the harmful UV rays but that over exposure can be far more harmful. Exposing children to high amounts of UV rays could raise their chances skin cancers later in life. The Skin Foundation cited “those who use sunbeds before age 30 increase their lifetime risk of melanoma.” Currently Melanoma is the most common form of cancer for young adults between 25 years
Tanning has become increasingly popular over years. The question is it beneficial or a bad business deal to start. The truth is tanning is convenient method utilized by many individuals to gain skin tone and color, builds self- esteem and promote relaxation. It can be beneficial in many aspects of our lives as well as an alternative to more harmful exposure but there are always risks at everything you do. Dermatologists today are against it for the simple fact that they believe it causes skin cancer. According to NCI (National Cancer Institute) exposure to UV radiation—whether from the sun or from artificial sources such as sunlamps utilized in tanning beds—increases of developing skin cancer. IRAC (International Agency for Research on
Imagine going to a tanning salon and asking information on the safety of indoor tanning. The employees tell you that it is safe, in fact, they encourage the use, saying it is good for you. Imagine six months later going to your doctor for a checkup and having your doctor tell you he is concerned about something you thought was a beauty mark. You come to find that you have malignant melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer at the age of 27. After doing some research it was obvious that going to this tanning salon was the cause. You have just taken a glimpse into the life of Lisa Whitehead who shared her story to prevent something like this from happening to others. This essay will analyze issues related to Indoor Tanning. It will employ the