Deduction and Induction Isabel Bolio

A way in which a human being can acquire knowledge is by reasoning through guided principles of validity; which is therefore through logic. This extends our understanding of our surroundings. Within logic there are two branches that lead to reasonable conclusions, these are: inductive and deductive logic. In the following paragraphs this two instruments will be described and exemplified in order to compare them as means to reach logic.

Inductive logic is the form to achieve a conclusive and specific knowledge through general rules. It is the urge of humans to construct patterns of observation through time. We all use simple induction all the time; for example. We assume that because the sun has*…show more content…*

This example demonstrates how humans draw conclusions without enough examples, therefore another problem arises: how many examples do we need to form a completely truthful conclusion?

On the other hand there is the opposite of Inductive logic: Deductive logic. It is the process by which a secure conclusion can be reached through one or more general statements that are otherwise called ‘premises’. It goes form general to specific. So if one is equal to two and two is equal to three then we know that one is equal to two. This way of reasoning is easily applied to our ordinary lives an example is: every day I leave to school at eight o’clock; I take fifteen minutes and get there on time, therefore if today I leave at eight o’clock I will get to school on time. Another example; all students that have high SAT scores do well in collage, a Laura had high SAT scores, she will do well in collage.

Equivalently to Inductive reasoning deductive logic has limitations. The issue is that the premises are either drawn form observation or are merely assumptions. This means that the premises of a deductive argument may come from inductive reasoning, which automatically leads us to the previous problems encountered. It may however be that the deductive argument is

A way in which a human being can acquire knowledge is by reasoning through guided principles of validity; which is therefore through logic. This extends our understanding of our surroundings. Within logic there are two branches that lead to reasonable conclusions, these are: inductive and deductive logic. In the following paragraphs this two instruments will be described and exemplified in order to compare them as means to reach logic.

Inductive logic is the form to achieve a conclusive and specific knowledge through general rules. It is the urge of humans to construct patterns of observation through time. We all use simple induction all the time; for example. We assume that because the sun has

This example demonstrates how humans draw conclusions without enough examples, therefore another problem arises: how many examples do we need to form a completely truthful conclusion?

On the other hand there is the opposite of Inductive logic: Deductive logic. It is the process by which a secure conclusion can be reached through one or more general statements that are otherwise called ‘premises’. It goes form general to specific. So if one is equal to two and two is equal to three then we know that one is equal to two. This way of reasoning is easily applied to our ordinary lives an example is: every day I leave to school at eight o’clock; I take fifteen minutes and get there on time, therefore if today I leave at eight o’clock I will get to school on time. Another example; all students that have high SAT scores do well in collage, a Laura had high SAT scores, she will do well in collage.

Equivalently to Inductive reasoning deductive logic has limitations. The issue is that the premises are either drawn form observation or are merely assumptions. This means that the premises of a deductive argument may come from inductive reasoning, which automatically leads us to the previous problems encountered. It may however be that the deductive argument is

Related

- Decent Essays
## The Puppy That Lost Its Way

- 1048 Words
- 5 Pages

3) Deductive Reasoning- Reasoning in which ideas are at the beginning and proof follows. Essays, textual commentary, and loose sentences are deductive.

- 1048 Words
- 5 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## Phi 103 (Informal Logic) Complete Class

- 2642 Words
- 11 Pages

Week 1 DQ 2 The Scope and Limits of Logic Logic can do a great deal in helping us understand our arguments. Explain what advantages we obtain by studying logic in terms of

- 2642 Words
- 11 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## The Declaration Of Sentiments, By Elizabeth Cady Stanton

- 1714 Words
- 7 Pages

Inductions, a series of examples, can be used to verify a major premise, which can then be the framework for deductions, by applying it to a specific case (minor premise). Deductive reasoning can be structured as a syllogism, a “logical structure that uses the major premise and minor premise to reach a necessary conclusion.” In this case, if the major and minor premise are true, then the conclusion is logically valid. In Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s The Declaration of Sentiments, both induction and deduction are used.

- 1714 Words
- 7 Pages

Decent Essays - Better Essays
Induction is a form of reasoning where the premises support the conclusion, but do not confirm that the conclusion is true. To justify induction, we are required to justify that we can infer that experiences we have never experienced will resemble those that we have experienced. Making inductive inferences is necessary for everyday life as well as in science. It is rational to rely on inductive arguments in everyday life for claims such as “the sun will rise tomorrow.” But inductive arguments require that nature is uniform. For example, tomorrow the laws of physics will continue to work the same as how they have in the past, so the world will continue spinning and the sun will rise. This perceived uniformity (the principle of uniformity of nature) allows claims like the one previously outlined to be easily understood. Although inductive arguments are useful, whether or not they can be justified is a topic of debate. In James Van Cleve’s “Reliability, Justification and the Problem of Induction,” he uses an inductive argument to attempt to justify induction. In his justification he claims that his method of argument is not circular. I argue that his reasoning is problematic because an inductive argument is not able to justify induction, mainly because inductive arguments presuppose the Principle of the Uniformity of Nature.

- 1445 Words
- 6 Pages

Better Essays - Decent Essays
## Inaugural Address Summary

- 611 Words
- 3 Pages

On the other hand, President Obama relied on both inductive and deductive reasoning types (Evans, 2012). Using inductive reasoning, President Obama was able to identify the key issues such as his purpose in improving alliances with countries across world and justified the ideas into a conclusion.

- 611 Words
- 3 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## How Does Sherlock Holmes Use Inductive Reasoning?

- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages

First, deductive reasoning is “a truth-guaranteeing type of reasoning, meaning that if the premises of a deductive argument are correct, then the conclusion must inescapably

- 1190 Words
- 5 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
A deductive argument is an argument that is intended by the user to be valid and to guarantee the truth of the conclusion given that premises are true. An inductive argument is an argument that is intended by the user to be strong or good enough that, if the premises were to be true, then it would be unlikely that the conclusion itself is false. An example of a deductive argument would be; Socrates was a man. All men are mortal. Therefore, Socrates was mortal. An example of an inductive argument would be; Socrates was Greek. Most Greeks ate fish. Socrates at fish.

- 1915 Words
- 8 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
Inductive Reasoning I think one of the best examples of Inductive Reasoning I used was the explanation of how efficient markets spur the growth and expansion of economic growth and how that is tied into globalization. As stated above, “Many Americans do not appreciate how efficient our markets are, in this case efficiency in reference to supply and demand is number one. These efficient markets allow economies to grow. As many have learned in a global world, when one economy grows, it spurs growth in

- 802 Words
- 4 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## Hume's Problem Of Induction

- 909 Words
- 4 Pages

The reason induction originated as a concept of reasoning did not come from its ability to result in proofs, but the usefulness in predicting future occurrences which it allows. As an example of this principle, we can bring into the light the supposed laws of nature which provide constants to our physical world. For any number of the infinite reasons at any instantaneous point of time exceptions to the laws of nature can emerge. Due to this fact, and the fact that the laws of nature are based on a finite number of circumstances of which permanence is assumed, laws of nature cannot be fully proven. However, without the human assumption of the existence of laws of nature, the progress of science would be halted. The laws of nature serve as an exceptional example of how even without a definite proof, inductive reasoning enables leaps in knowledge and

- 909 Words
- 4 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## How To Write An Eek Two Critical Thinking Lecture Summary

- 455 Words
- 2 Pages

When answering discussion questions, be sure to format it. Inductive arguments claim that their conclusion probably follows from the premises. As a result, inductive arguments are either stronger or weaker, rather than either true or false. Some words and phrases commonly used in inductive arguments are probably, most likely, chances are, it is reasonable to suppose, we can expect, and it seems probable that. There are three common types of inductive arguments. Generalizations are drawing conclusions. Analogies are based on comparisons. Causal arguments are claiming this is the cause of that.

- 455 Words
- 2 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## Honey Bees Deducting

- 377 Words
- 2 Pages

Chapter 7, deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is taking a general case that is understood and making it specific. For deductive reasoning to take place you first have to have a general idea about what it is. Once you have a

- 377 Words
- 2 Pages

Decent Essays - Decent Essays
## Peplau's Theory Of Interpersonal And Inductive Reasoning

- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages

Inductive Reasoning Peplau defined her inductive approach in both general and specific terms. The inductive approach for concept naming are described in several steps (a) observing behaviors for which no explanatory concepts are available, (b) seeking to repeat those observations in others under similar conditions, (c) noting regularities concerning the

- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages

Decent Essays - Better Essays
## Essay on The Importance of Being on Time in the Army

- 1715 Words
- 7 Pages

Inductive Reasoning — The ability to combine pieces of information to form general rules or conclusions (includes finding a relationship among seemingly unrelated events).|

- 1715 Words
- 7 Pages

Better Essays - Decent Essays
## David Hume Problem Of Induction Essay

- 1203 Words
- 5 Pages

Philosophers create new thesis all the time. Many times these thesis are challenged by other ideas. The Problem of induction was introduced by David Hume in the 18th century. He questioned how past observation could be the same observation in the future. We can assume that past events can occur again, and this was not the problem. The problem is Hume does not believe that past experiences can lead to the future. It is beneficial to completely understand Hume’s stand point therefore I will explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is multiple premises that are believed to be true or at least true most of the time. Deductive reasoning is a theory that claims truth. If the premise is true the conclusion is true. Hume first separated human reasoning in two different ways. The first way is relations of ideas. These are the sciences of geometry, algebra and

- 1203 Words
- 5 Pages

Decent Essays - Better Essays
## Reasearch Methodology

- 1154 Words
- 5 Pages

5a. Inductive and deductive reasoning are key elements in research. Describe these processes in detail. Deduction process : application of a general theory to a specific case . Induction process : A process where we observe a specific phenomenon and on this basis we arrive at a general conclusion .

- 1154 Words
- 5 Pages

Better Essays