Inductive Argument

Racial profiling impacts the lives of African Americans, Asians, Latinos, South Asians, and the Arab communities (Persistence of racial and ethnic profiling in the United States: a follow-up report to the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination 12). Profiling based on race stems from racism, and has lastingly marked and structured the society of the United States (10). In some aspects, it is considered a violation of human rights; therefore, acts then started to develop (12). For example, the United States introduced the Subsequent End of Racial Profiling Acts to Congress in 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2009, but they

Racial profiling is a very prevalent issue within the criminal justice system that is quite controversial, but there is a significant number of evidence that shows that racial profiling has been present since the 1600’s and continues to be a significant issue. Racial profiling is evident in the criminal justice system in various ways such as in interrogations, jury selection, misleading statistics, stops, and immigration laws. Racial profiling within interrogations and jury selection can be seen with the Brandley v. Keeshan case. Racial profiling within statistics can be seen in instances where the numbers focus on arrests and incarcerations that do not necessarily mean a crime was committed. Stops are seen as evidence showing racial profiling with a personal experience, and lastly, immigration laws are seen as showing racial profiling by the encounter of a Mexican American women had with an officer in Arizona.

One of the most imminent threats looming within American society is race relations. America is a melting pot of different races, cultures, and religions, yet the matter of racial profiling still remains prominent today. By definition it is considered “an activity carried out by enforcers of the law wherein they investigate or stop any individual in traffic or round up people of the same race or ethnicity for crime suspicion” (NYLN.org ). This profiling has become a significant catalyst in the tension that has been ensuing between minorities and the government. Hostility has grown due to the apparent and intentional targeting of “brown people”, and

Profiling is something that every person has or will do at some point in their life; some may even profile without even realizing it. There are various forms of profiling which will be discussed, along with the history behind profiling and how it has been used successfully by Law Enforcement in several areas as a field on investigation (Douglass, Ressler &Burgess, 1986). Profiling has various positives along with negatives, and these are accepted by Satzewich and Shaffir (2009) who suggest that racial profiling is best understood in the context of a police subculture where these police officer intergrade profiling as part of their every day work routine. Profiling is a big factor in the daily work of every Law Enforcement Officer and it cannot be avoided (Becker, 2004). For the most part profiling is seen as part of an officers daily investigative tools, from border searches, to pulling vehicles over for traffic citations the officers will use his or her discretion on those who arouse their suspicion (Rose, 2002). Therefore, this paper will analyze the overall effectiveness of profiling and how it either proves to successfully reduce crime or not (Rose, 2002).

Even the United States struggles with issues of racial discrimination despite being a society highly based on immigrants and multicultural diversity. On one hand, people frown on treatment based on race, whether that is on an individual or group level. On the other, people are tired and annoyed by the seemingly constant call of discrimination. All of these feelings culminate into the debate pertaining to the use of racial profiling. Likewise, there are some individuals that hold a certain level of acceptance in regard to racial profiling. However, what is lost in the process because of that acceptance? There are many components that need to be thought about in reference to the use of racial profiling. In addition, it can be viewed

A recent article published on the website, Jewish World Review, states that racial profiling is frequently used, not only in law enforcement, but also in everyday existence. The author, Walter Williams, states that, “we face a world of costly and incomplete education, and that means we have to do a lot of guessing and playing hunches.” Because of this uncertainty, specific indications are required that can provide the public with more information and allow educated decision-making. The article presents examples of the types of racial profiling in existence. For example, simply for their own safety reasons, taxi drivers will avoid driving into a particular area of the city because of the reputation of it’s propensity to crime. They will also drive past a person of color and stop to pick up a white passenger for that same reason, valid or not. Williams cites his own personal experience with his physician, who uses a typical black man’s health statistics collected from years of study to aggressively monitor his high blood pressure. It is because these medical statistics illustrate that high blood pressure is more prevalent in black men than in any other demographic group.

The United States is a media driven society and controversial topics are enhanced because of the resources available in the American civilization facilitating communication and awareness. Racial profiling is a complex topic that mostly affects minorities, however, everyone is affected by this issue in today’s society. After the attack on the World Trade Center, racial profiling has been used to presumably stop or prevent terrorism. It has come to light that this approach has had a diminutive progress, no terrorist has been caught through this technique. To this day some Americans are still distrustful of Muslim and Middle Eastern individuals. Some argue that racial profiling has the potential to catch terrorists, but social profiling can sometimes justify terrorist acts and its discrimination. The recent eradication of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) has affected thousands of recipients in a comparable way, but it has taken a toll on their social life. The DACA program was launched as an attempt to provide a means by which persons who do not have a legal status, but were brought to the Unite States as minors, could apply for legal permanent status, leading to neutralization (“A Brief History”). Although it is very common for our community to think of racial profiling as an absent or past issue, the obstacle is still present and is currently being contemplated to analyze its effect on the American society along with discrimination.

In Satzewich and Shaffir’s article, they set in motion that there is evidence from people with minority backgrounds stating that officers are engaging in racial and/or religious profiling. They argue that racial profiling is a method used regularly in their line of work. Because people of minority communities believe that racial profiling exists, it gives the police a

Muffler, S. (2006). Racial profiling: Issues, data, and analyses (pp. 32-33). New York: Nova Science.

In America’s judicial system, the color of skin or race are often equated with criminal behavior. Dr. King once said “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” As United States citizens, we are not convicted of a crime until proven guilty. However, racial profiling aids law enforcement on deciding when to pursue or detain a suspect based on race. This method undoubtedly categorizes that certain races are more prone to commit crimes. Nevertheless, racial profiling is a violation of constitutional rights thus protected by federal law; oddly it is often disregarded by states.

Racial profiling refers to the negative discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. But what if it had some positive sumption instead of negative?The generally accepted and narrow definition of racial/ethnic profiling is any police action such as arrest, search, contact or detention which was solely based on the person’s race or ethnicity rather than on the individual's behavior. Legal precedence exists which has declared this narrow definition of racial profiling as being unconstitutional (Dutta A.17.).

To determine whether racial profiling is morally wrong, it must be clear as to what it is and what it does. Racial profiling is the use of race as at least one factor in determining whether or not to investigate someone and how thoroughly to investigate them. It involves practices of unreasonable search and seizures because of a person’s race even when there is no logical reason to believe that particular person is guilty of anything. In this paper, I will consider an argument for the conclusion that racial profiling is morally wrong because it involves unreasonable search and seizures because of a person’s race and not their behavior. I will then consider the objection that racial profiling can be morally acceptable, when it is rational. I conclude that racial profiling promotes discrimination and therefore is morally wrong.

Racial Profiling is a practical practice that law enforcement should be applying as well as utilizing to make more arrests. Public safety is a law enforcers priority and racial profiling aids. Not only is racial profiling effective, but as well as a logical implementation in the police force. A study that was directed in London, United Kingdom, in the 1999 showed that when police made fewer arrests and searches, the crime rate rose. The essence of Kops argument is that without racial profiling the public’s safety of the United Kingdom was put in

How likely are you to be racist? Have you ever found yourself making jokes about race, religion, or ethnical background? How would you feel about seeing a Asian American behind the wheel of a car or a Muslim American walk on a plane and be seated in your row on the tenth anniversary of 9/11? Everyday someone somewhere commits racial profiling in a way that might be harmful to others. Some of these individuals take it a step farther to prevent racial profiling from occurring as regularly, as in the case of Shoshana Hebshi. Racial profiling has been deemed unconstitutional yet it still occurs. I believe that racial profiling could be useful for society if used to educate people on their own racial misconceptions of other cultures and it could allow them to see some of the racial misconceptions that others hold about them. Through the use of interest groups and iron triangles formation I hope to illustrate that racial profiling could be a useful tool to check people 's racial tendencies and allow them to be more aware of them.

In the reality, the prominent focus of profiling is on the offender’s ethic race. Racial profiling allows people to