Influence Of The Difference Between International Accounting Standard And Vietnam Accounting Standards

Differentiate between the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the International Financial Reporting Standards for their impact on financial

Why do we study comparative accounting? Countries around the world have different aspects such as taxation, legal systems, culture and colonial influence that differ the way accounting is reported. Ultimately the need for fair presentation is the final objective to comparative accounting. Thousands of years ago when accounting was first practiced, each country practiced financial reporting according to the power and strengths in their country, regardless of how accounting was reported in neighboring countries. Nowadays, because the world is becoming more globalized and harmonized, standard-setters feel the need to report their accounting in a uniform way. The International Accounting Standards Board [IASB] was formed as a non-for-profit

As the responsibilities of the global harmonization of accounting standards IFRS and GAAP transfer to IASB, FASB’s influence is waning. Advantages of the convergence include high quality financial reporting, which lowers cost of capital for investors and the cost of borrowing for companies. However, there are disadvantages to be noted, such as the costs of introducing IFRS to current and potential accountants and the risk of reducing the uniformity of financial reports due to the lax rulings of IFRS, which promotes earnings management amongst companies. Although arguments regarding the convergence remain prevalent, the completion of IFRS and GAAP is inevitable. Come year 2015, accountants, investors, and companies alike will discover whether or not the pros outweighed the cons; or vice versa.

The IOSCO plan does not cover accounting standards.(66) These standards are important for providing financial statements in a scheme that are prepared in the similar manner as those by issuers from other countries. The development of international accounting standards is the subject of a distinct project by IOSCO, and many accounting professionals who are concomitant with that undertaking are hopeful that a satisfactory solution is within reach.(67) Supposing, however, that an agreement is possible on a core set of financial standards and that they too are embraced by securities regulators as compulsory for foreign issuers, the road to commonality has at least two other impediments.

This research project will inform the reader of the difference between the United States accounting standards and International accounting standards. The United States uses the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to issue financial reporting procedures. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). There are proposals for the United States to adopt the International standards. Financial reporting procedures are debated about the United States using the Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP) or following the global procedures. This

A set of internationally recognized accounting standards facilitates capital flows across borders. Globally accepted standards make financial information readily comparable for its users. Foreign investors are more inclined to put money into a U.S. company if they are familiar with the company’s financial reporting. Conversely, U.S. investors will find it easier and less risky to invest in foreign companies when they know the local accounting standards (Epstein 2009). This will make U.S. companies and capital markets more competitive, since it saves costly reconcilition of different standards. Preparers, investors, auditors, and others will benefit from these cost effieciencies, since a Results of an IFAC Survey among accounting leaders around the world with respect to the importance of convergence to International Financial Reporting Standards for economic growth in their countries:

The thought of implementing a uniformity in the accounting standards has been discussed for a long time in the world of accounting. In fact, there is a quote from Financial Times that stated “The goal of single worldwide accounting language has been a dream. Today it is fast becoming a reality, and the pace is picking up.” (Carmona and Trombetta 2008, p.456). Likewise, Ball (2006) had a great article discussing about the uniformity of the accounting standards. He had mentioned some interesting points such as the important of uniformity, as well as the disadvantages of it. Even though uniformity in accounting standards have been around for a while, it is still something that yet to be accomplished completely. In Ball (2006) stated his concern on this matter that even with the same standards it may be still some differences in the reports. Thus, in this essay there will be discussions whether uniformity of accounting standards is needed in producing the financial reports along with the obstacles some countries may occur when try to do it.

This report discusses the accounting practices of the following countries U.K, U.S.A and China. An analysis of these different accounting systems will be conducted on issues such as the growth and background, social, economic and fiscal pressures that have led to each nations current characteristics. Concluding on the direction each nations accounting systems and practices seem to be heading towards.

The effort of moving towards international convergence of accounting standards has risen since the end of World War II, resulting to the revolution of financial reporting. “IFRS for example are accounting standards issued by the IASB, an independent organisation based in London, UK” (Ball, 2006). IASB is primarily established to promulgate IFRS and are responsible to set rules that can be equivalently implemented by public companies internationally. Uniform accounting standards are simply demanded in order to produce a comparable accounting information as many big companies begin to enlarge their territory beyond their home country. Therefore, many professionals believe that a transparent and understandable financial reporting could be produced by using uniform standards. However, the competency of uniform standards alone in producing uniform financial reporting is arguable due to significant factors. The existence of varieties in capitalism by individual countries have restricted the ability of uniform standards in regulating local financial reporting. Plus, the distinction in institutional influences make it harder for uniform standards to work efficiently in various political conditions and to agree with different types of regional legal structures. Besides, cultures and religions also play an important role in accounting industry as they have the power to shape national economies. Therefore, regardless of many benefits that uniform standards could bring, there are

For decades, countries have designed their individual accounting standards principle-based, rules-based, tax-oriented, or business-oriented. Globalization has led to the greater needs with regards to harmonizing the standards (Kimmel, 2013). By late 1990’s the dominant standards were the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) and U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). Thus, both the standard setters namely; FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) and IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) launched a convergence project prior to the IFRS being essentially adopted by several countries. Measures are being taken to reduce likely impacts the frameworks would have on financial statement and reduction of last minute changes (Kimmel, 2013).

From 1904, some people suggest that we need a uniform accounting standard in the world. After the work hard in more than half century, in 1973, international accounting standard committee has been found. Although this is a non-government organization, they set up accounting standard for all the country, which is convenient to international trade, comparison, and analysis. With the increase of recognition, there are more countries used it, but many organizations and people disagreed the standard. This essay will focus on the different attitude of initial recognition methods of International Accounting Standard 16: Property, Plant, and Equipment and discuss the advantage and disadvantage of methods and influence the reason why IAS will allow

Accounting rules and practices are wildly varied around the world today, and doing international business in that type of environment presents many difficulties. From language, cultural, and religious barriers to currency differences and accounting practices, it is difficult to see where businesses stand without a common standard to guide them. Some say that education, culture, and sometimes religious differences are the main factors for such variations (McGee & Bandyopadhyay, 2009). It would seem logical if all these differences could be harnessed into one set of accounting standards for everyone to use.

International Accounting Standards (IAS) in effect since 2002 and International Board (IASB) together, provides the conceptual framework of financial reporting in the UK, in effect as of 2005. They have been working together to meet International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by International Finance Committee (IFC) which have been endorsed by the EU. IFRS uses a principles approach designed to provide flexibility, transparency and comparability allowing a robust system in providing investors with relevant and reliable financial data, Randy, M (2014). In this essay, countries such as China and the US will be used as examples where the impacts, strengths and weaknesses will be analysed by comparing and contrasting their progress. As a result, a judgement will be made of which country has progressed well in converging to the standards and whether benefits can be seen to the country as a whole.

With the number of countries that have switched to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for their financial reporting, as well as the continued efforts made between the IFRS and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP), it is evident that international convergence is an overall appealing idea for global reporting. With that said, for decades now US GAAP has worked with IFRS to create a universal standard; and while progress has been made to diminish variances between the standards, there are still large, if not unattainable efforts ahead of us. The hype over a proposed uniform set of global accounting standards appears to be stunted by the lost efforts in the convergence project between the US GAAP and IFRS. As the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) moves forward with its standards setting, there must be a reevaluation of the goal for reporting standards and efforts with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

Under the economic globalization and the rapid development of Islamic finance in recent years, the business activities with Islamic countries became a worldwide focus. However, it is notable that the conventional accounting system would face a challenge with the compliance of Shariah. Therefore, the Islamic accounting standards AAOIFI were developed due to of the existing problem with the adoption of the convention accounting standards (IFRS). In this chapter, to illustrate the difference among IFRS and AAOIFI, the general description of these two accounting standards will be presented, followed by the distinguishing between the adoption as well as the comparison of some specific accounting treatments. At the