Influence of the Roman Theater on Cicero’s Oration Pro Caelia By

Rhetorical Appeals are everywhere, it’s in advertisements , it’s on magazines etc..William Shakespeare uses them in order to appeal to the audience.In this essay, rhetorical appeals is the main topic.There are 3 types of rhetorical appeals.Pathos is used to stir feelings in the reader.Logos is the argument that is logical because of the convincing reasons and the logical evidence.Ethos is based on character credibility and or reliability of the author.William Shakespeare used rhetorical appeals to connect with the audience and make them interested in the play.

“A superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions“ -Confucius. This quote is relevant because in Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony gave speeches after Caesar’s death. A speaker has to make connections with the audience, use creativity, and have passion. Antony was rhetoric, cunning, and used pathos to connect with the people of Rome. Brutus was also rhetoric, honorable, and used logos and ethos to influence the audience. Overall, Brutus did not influence the crowd like he hoped to. Antony knew how he was going to persuade the people before he gave his speech.

In William Shakespeare's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar's death. In Act 3, Scene 2 of this play Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans toward their views. Brutus tried to make the people believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antony's and Brutus's speech to the people are conveyed through tone and rhetorical devices.

In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony attempt to persuade the audience of their position on the death of Caesar. While Brutus explains that his death was necessary, Antony claims that Caesar was not deserving of his demise. However, though Brutus does have ample credibility and taps into the emotional link with his audience to some extent, he does not convey as powerful of an argument as Antony, as he fails to provide sufficient factual evidence. Antony, on the other hand, utilizes logical argumentation with solid evidence, creates an emotional connection with his audience, and maintains credibility in order to support his own argument. Through this, it can be seen that Antony’s use of rhetorical appeals and devices is superior

The most predominate and important aspect In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main charaters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd,using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s.

Another rhetorical technique that Cicero uses in his speeches and teaches his student is the use of ethos. Ethos is an appeal to ethics, and it is a means of convincing someone of the character or credibility of the persuader. In other words, having the trust of the audience based on your speech. Cicero teaches in the On Oratory and Orator to “deliver you own opinions” (Cicero 17); meaning that your opinions will help your credibility image and help get the trust of the people. His speech to the senate he states, “I cannot bear people to say that such a horror could have been perpetrated in this country” (Cicero 83). Here this quote it demonstrates his passion and shows and dedications to this country. He is saying that he cannot see what

One way in which Cicero successfully uses epideictic rhetoric is by acknowledging the power and intelligence of his audience. He praises their education, well-roundedness, and civility by saying, “dicentem hoc concurs hominum litteratissimorum, hac vestra humanitate, hoc denique praetore exercente iudicium” (Cicero, lines 31-33). The use of the superlative in “litteratissimorum” when describing his “most cultured” audience emphasizes his feelings of respect and admiration for his peers. Similarly, he also uses this same construction describing Archias a few seconds before, calling him an “eruditissimo homine” (Cicero, line 31). This mirroring of flattering superlatives for both Archias and the jurors illustrates Cicero’s admiration for his audience, his defendant, and for the liberal arts as he emphasizes the importance of an educated

The three main sources used in this essay are Julius Caesar by Joshua J. Mark, Caesar, Julius by Justin Cornfield, and The Twelve Caesars by Suetonius. The twelve Caesars by Suetonius is the only contemporary source; Suetonius lived and wrote the book within one hundred years of Julius’ death. The twelve caesars is the most reliable because it is a contemporary source. Historians do not know much about his education when he was a child up to when his father died, but they know that he studies rhetoric later in life.

In the play “Julius Caesar”, characters Brutus and Antony give speeches at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus had a fairly short speech and Antony, on the other hand, had a lengthy speech. Analyzing the ethos, pathos, and logos from both Brutus and Antony’s funeral speeches, it is clear that Antony is more persuasive towards the crowd. There are three forms of rhetorical speaking: ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos is the appeal of the reader, or audience’s, sense to ethics and morals.

Lastly, delivery was said to be, “the control of voice and body in a manner suitable to the dignity of the subject matter and the speech.” Cicero’s idea of delivery can be compared to the modern day quote of, “it isn’t always what you say, but how you say it.” The delivery of speech provides the audience with its intent. That is why orators practiced movement, gesture, posture, facial expression, vocal tone and

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, rhetorical devices are commonly used to persuade the audience. During the speeches many devices were effectively used to convince the Romans to choose the side of the argument being presented. Mark Antony’s speech ended up being more effective than Brutus’s due to his use of pathos throughout to help his point be made that Caesar did not deserve to

Cassius, Brutus, and Antony use rhetoric successfully in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, albeit each differently and for different causes. Each of these men uses his skills in rhetoric to convince each other and at some points the entire population of Rome to follow his beliefs. However, each of these men has different motivations to do so, as well as different characteristics and general worldviews.

In this paper I will argue that both Sicinius and Coriolanus through their language in the passages display their desire for power and control in the play. Sicinius shows this desire when he attempts to fix his lack of control due to emotion as he mentions the power of the Plebeians and Coriolanus' imminent exile. Coriolanus displays his desire for power and control when in his speech, he struggles to keep control of his anger and attempts to use his pride to gain power over his banishment. Sicinuis' speech in this passage is poetry, as he is a Roman tribune and politician. This also indicates the importance of his speech, as he is attempting to guide the interests of the people that look to him for guidance.

He believed that the immediate purpose of education was to train the student to be an excellent speaker and a good man, but also saw the ultimate, long range purpose was to produce an outstanding, wise and virtuous public servant (Class Notes, Roman Education). The “ideal orator would possess an excellent power of speech and all the moral virtues as well” (Gutek, 2011, p. 74). Eloquence, he affirmed, should be married with virtuous living and public service. He believed that the

The advent of modern theater as we know it today began with the worship of Dionysus: the god of the grape harvest, winemaking and wine, of ritual madness, fertility, theater and religious ecstasy in Greek mythology and a weeklong competition that welcomed the Spring in ancient Greece. Many great playwrights were introduced to the World by the means of this weeklong competition including Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides. Sophocles is perhaps one of the pioneers of the genre of tragedy and his plays Oedipus Rex, Antigone and Oedipus at Colonus have for centuries inspired contemporary playwrights and theater artists to venture deeper into the understanding of the complex idea of the individual versus fate. In this essay I intend to examine Aristotle’s Poetics and the five principles