Influences Of Culture On Self-Disclosure Paper

Self-disclosure is an important part of any close relationship. Without sharing our own fears and weaknesses, we can

In chapter 9 Looking Out, Looking in by Ronald. B. Adler, Adler informs us about intimacy in close relationships. The four dimensions of intimacy are physical, intellectual, emotional, and shared activities, and it’s quite often that a majority of relationships exhibit all four of these dimensions, while others exhibit one or two. According to research Masculine, and feminine styles can demonstrate how women are shown to be more willing to share their feelings, than men. An abundance of cultures influence intimacy, and the notions of public and private selves have changed dramatically. Collectivist cultures generally do not reach to outsiders, although they often wait until they are introduced before entering a conversation. Individualistic

Social Penetration theory attempts to explain the differences in communication in relation to the depth of interpersonal relationships. “Irwin Altman and Dallas Taylor, the theory states that relationships begin and deepen through self-disclosure. In the beginning, people establish

Social penetration theory believes relationships can progress from platonic to intimate through increasing self-disclosure (West & Turner, 2010, pp. 168-169). During the initial stages of a relationship, self-disclosure needs to be reciprocated, in order for trust to form (Wright, 2017). Any relationship can evolve by using social penetration theory; it is not specific to any one type of relationship. However, talking about sensitive topics is not easy, and can lead to a person feeling vulnerable. Consequently, it is imperative, during the initial stages of a relationship, that self- disclosure is reciprocated, in order to form trust (West & Turner, 2010, pp. 168-169 & Wright, 2017). Social penetration theory predicts nonintimate

In emerging adulthood, many people experience the need to share their personal life with someone else. Erikson name for this crisis is intimacy versus isolation and emerging adults and many older adults know this feeling very well (Berger, 2014, p. 551). As emerging adults begin feeling the need for human connection, friendships and intimate relationships deepen for this reason (Berger, 2014, p. 551). As a senior in high school my friends became an extremely important part of my life, we told each other everything and the need for human connection was evident as I always wanted to be with my friends and share my personal life with them. I had, and currently have, the same 2 friends that I would confide in about boy problems, health

We as individuals’ decide what, when and to whom, and how much to disclose personal thoughts and feelings. Although level of self-disclosure and personal relationships are not synonymous concepts, self-disclosure plays an important role in constructing what kind of relationships individuals have with each another.1 Self-disclosure, depending on reactions of relationship partners, also plays an important role in validating self-worth and personal identity.2

Communication is one of the most important things in our lives. Quality communication in marriage is defined as the interpersonal, transactional, symbolic process by which marriage partners achieve and maintain understanding of each other (Montgomery, 1981). Marriage and communication are far more complicated than it seems. This paper will discuss the self-disclosure in

An experimental design was used to determine if interracial dating impacts openness to other cultures. Researchers created vignettes of scenarios involving couples of different races with different backgrounds to create a manipulation to assess participants views. In addition, a quasi-experimental design evaluated the participants influences to date outside their race and analyze their openness to other cultures. Vignettes consisted of statements like Matthew is likely to be more attracted to African American women than White women, Dating outside of his race is probably a phase for Matthew that he will outgrow, and Dating outside of her race is probably a phase for Kendra that she will outgrow. Participants personal interracial and openness measures included statements like, I would never date outside of my race, I enjoy learning about cultures other than my own, I have a lot in common with Whites in the United States, and I have

A third variable that can affect intimacy and self-disclosure is one’s personality. If some one is an extrovert they will likely share more willingly than say a reserved introverted personality type. Of the correlations the mostly is that the more that self-disclosure is implemented the more likely a greater level of intimacy will develop because the more that one shares about themselves a level of trust forms leading to greater levels of familiarity and

This shows that children are more inclined to create friendships which they have been exposed to previously linking what they believe, ethnicity and places they have been together, as something they have in

The 5 main factors for communication boundary are culture, personality, the relationship, biological sex, and motivations. These 5 factors shape when, where, and whom we disclose information to. All the factors set a different tone of how people choose to disclose information. For example “culture have a relatively loose rules regarding privacy and self-disclosure” (p.141). You should know what topics are appropriate to discuss with a person. For myself if I’m given a secret about someone else life or situation, I have to understand the value of the information. As the person being told a secret we must be able to maintain privacy by managing information. To manger someone secrets we can use topic avoidance and secret keeping. Topic avoidance is when someone intentionally avoids talking about a particular topic. For example, people in relationships will avoid topics that they both are aware of. Secret keeping is intentional efforts to keep information from others. This deals with self disclosing to each other that no one else know.

The results illustrated how adolescents communicate with one another, and how their friendships can influence their behavior. For instance, adolescents are more likely to communicate openly and engage in the same activities with close friends. More simply, the closer the friendship or bond, adolescent are willing to maintain their closeness by communicating openly and share similar experiences. The authors did well in describing and analyzing their results, because they showed how a close relationship could affect adolescents. For instance, strong relationships could affect who adolescents date, what activities they will engage in, what experiences they will share. More simply, strong relationship made adolescents more open minded and more willing to communicate openly. However, the weakness of the article included how African American adolescents were above or below other racial groups, when pertaining to friendships and sexual behavior. Illustrating where other racial groups stood with friendship and sexual behavior could have made the article stronger. An interpretation that the authors overstated how adolescents depend on their friends’ experience and opinion when making their own decisions about relationship. More simply, adolescents will form their own opinion based off their friends’ experiences or feelings. Weakness in the article had an effect on the interpretation of the results and conclusion because it seemed

Two big pieces of this social penetration theory puzzle are depth and breadth of self-disclosure. The depth of self-disclosure is how deep someone can penetrate the layers of the onion or how deep your self-disclosure goes. The more intimate someone is in the relationship the more depth of self-disclosure that relationship will have. Where-as the breadth of self-disclosure is the range of topics in which disclosure takes place within a relationship. Younger people tend to have more breadth where-as the older generation tends to take part

Self-disclosure is the voluntary sharing of personal history, preferences, attitudes, feelings, values, secrets, etc. with another person (Griffin, p. 97). As stated in the introduction Altman and Taylor look at relationships as an “onions.” The different layers are representative of different feelings of a person. When

Cross-sex relationships are becoming increasingly more popular than ever before. According to Schoonover and McEwan of Predicting the audience challenge in cross-sex friendships, men and women have complimenting communication styles and this is what makes cross-sex friendships so appealing as it grows to be more accepted (Schoonover, McEwan, 2014). In analyzing the benefits for both sexes, the most significant challenges, and the cultural or societal challenges, it can be concluded that while cross-sex friendships come with their own trials, it can be a very rewarding relationship.