Information Gathering : Information And Intelligence Gathering

In an attempt to reduce crime rates and gather intelligence information in a specific area, and due in part to the continuing advancements in surveillance technologies, the law enforcement community has opted to employ these systems. Overwhelmingly, a consensus amongst the population agrees police officers should be held accountable for their action through continuous monitoring during their on duty hours (CBS News New York 2015). Furthermore, demand from the public to become knowledgeable in all

gain information, most of us would readily agree that this subject is very debatable. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether or not the government should be able to make a human endure extreme pain and suffering in order to gain information. Whereas some are convinced that torture is inhumane and unethical and the information that is gained is at times inaccurate and a waste of time to rely on, others maintain that torture is a good way to retrieve information that

The intelligence community of the United States is a large, robust and bureaucratic system. From this community though, the national objectives of the United States are supported through their gathering and analytical capabilities. The following paper will highlight the intelligence agencies of the Federal government as well as state and local agencies that make up the intelligence community. Within these entities are programs that develop intelligence for use in protecting the homeland as well

for the Intelligence Community (IC) is the balance between gathering actionable intelligence using a variety of intelligence gathering methods with violating the civil liberties of United States citizens. As we discussed last week oversight of the IC by our congressional leaders is at the forefront of ensuring civil liberties and funding for programs are not being abused. The American citizens depend on the congress and the IC to ensure civil liberties are adhered to during all intelligence gathering

The use of intelligence gathering efforts of the United States in clandestine operations incognito with significant levels of deception is often rarely open to the American public. The intelligence agencies’ empowerment by the Federal government continues their surveillance methods and information gathering techniques often without interference in the name of national security. Since the release of the intelligence gathering methodologies by the National Security analyst Edward Snowden, there has

Homeland security must utilize intelligence gathered to ensure the protection of its borders. Without proper intelligence gathering or strategies homeland security wouldn’t be able to perform at its upmost capability. Intelligence communities, fusion centers, and appointed individuals are the cornerstones of how intelligence supports homeland security efforts. The capabilities and limitations of intelligence gathering and dissemination in these areas help ensure American borders are protected. These

dependant upon technological developments to gather intelligence. The “secret agents” of yesterday are very close to being obsolete. With technology becoming the prime source of intelligence gathering, there is an assumption that other countries are gathering intelligence in similar ways. The only way to combat intelligence gathering against the United States is to know what technological intelligence collection resources are being used for gathering information. This is the job of Multidisciplinary Counterintelligence

President Roosevelt had created a centralized intelligence organization through the OSS, but it began to become clear that the function of spying and monitoring had ceased to have a military function. In this case, Roosevelt assigned William J. Donovan to form the OSS as a way to coordinate intelligence data being collected by the armed forces and the government in 1941. Donovan was the key figure in the unification of the OSS as the Coordinator of Information (COI) during the outset of World War II.

enforcement information is important to homeland security in several ways. After the terrorist attacks in 2001 intelligence fusion gaps were identified that included the inability to incorporate law enforcement information that already existed. This indicates that local and state law enforcement activities do provide information with counter terrorism intelligence value. Currently there are state and local fusion centers that are tasked with information and intelligence sharing. This

The largest ethical issue in intelligence gathering in the United States is difficult to define because there is no clearly defined method of acceptable or unacceptable form of gathering intelligence. What may be deemed unacceptable today may not be as controversial years from now, or the circumstances that drive us today to collect information may change when the risks are higher, such as the potential for mass casualties. Several actors can influence what we interpret as unethical. Here we will