Information On Communication Styles And Skills

In addition to having a wide range and focus for the appropriate behavior, I must also consider which skills will allow me to transition from thought into action. As a young child, I developed a severe stuttering problem and had to overcome what seemed to be a life hurdle to successfully communicate in today’s society. It wasn’t until I had reached the 4th grade that my mind was capable or realizing there was a better way to communicate. The grueling process of relearning to breathe and pronounce hard onset syllables was awkward, though the more time I spent practicing, the easier it was to learn new habits and develop strong speaking behaviors. Similarly, learning to communicate with a diverse group of people, I had to practice, sometimes with multiple failed attempts, to achieve a level of skillfulness and an ability to integrate. I’ve taken all the strategies I’ve learned from a child to an adult to become skillful communicator. In additional to applying behaviors mastering personal skills to improve my communication platform, the steps required understanding the competent characteristics of an effective communicator, I feel I will be able to successfully manage and lead a

My most preferred communication style is Emotive and I would have to agree with my assessment. It states that an emotive enjoys a fast paced, enthusiastic environment where persuasive skills can be used to bring others into an alliance to accomplish goals. An emotive has a dynamic ability to think quickly and thrive on involvement with people. In addition, Chapter 5 states that Emotive style defines a style that combines higher sociability and higher dominance. They are expressive and willing to spend time maintaining and enjoying a large number of relationships. My reasoning behind why I agree is due to the fact that after thinking about myself; the emotive communication style describes me exactly, which is scary to tell the

Edmondson (2009) discusses four different basic communication styles. The first style is expressive which have a tendency to speak quickly, focus on the big picture, and have a high energy level. They can be perceived as unpredictable, vain, or excessively jovial. Next are systematic who tend to focus on small details, not on the larger picture, and try to avoid conflicts. The third type listed is sympathetic. These individuals focus on people and relationships. They are good listeners and so concern for everyone’s needs. Sympathetics also do not like be at odds with others. Lastly, the fourth communication style identified is directs who generally keep dialogue short and are perceived as a multitaskers. The study recommends that the individual discover her own communication style and adjust the style according to the situation.

My personal communication philosophy includes two factors that will support improved comprehension among those attempting to connect. The following paper will discuss these two elements: merging communication styles to aid in understanding and communication intent vs. perception.

In this report I will talk about four different ways of communicating, the four different communication styles are written communication, non verbal, verbal and computerized. Communication is something that everyone does without even thinking. Communication is giving information either verbally or written and the person receiving and obtaining the information. This process is an ongoing process such as one person may say something and in turn you may say something. Now you both have gain new information. This can happen in the simplest conversations such as ‘How

As a leader in my organization, I must have clear communications both oral and written. My passion to help others has given me a drive to communicate efficiently and effectively with my organization and external stakeholders. My writing style is to be clear and concise and do not mislead the reader. I also research my topic to ensure I understand the subject before I begin to write my communication.

I recognised in my first communication reflection in year one that it is a complicated and sometimes difficult activity, that requires the use of active listening skills, and an understanding of the content of what is being relayed, it gives and seeks information, as well as expressing emotions and attitudes, (Hinchliff, 2009).

One of the communication styles that fits me is contentious. This is described as a communication style that is aggressive (Solaja, Idowu, & James, 2015). This type of communication worked for me somewhat. When I was a Corrections Officer I used this argumentative form of communication to gain compliance. I was not always aggressive but it had its advantages

As a part of my assignment to identify the styles and different skills of communication by studying Brian Krzanich actions and behaviour. Next part is to perform a critical analysis on the identified communication styles and skills by comparing and contrasting strength, weakness of a selected person.

To paraphrase Shakespeare “How do I fail to communicate, let me count the ways.” The easy part would be listing all my possible communication shortcomings. A more difficult challenge was deciding which one I should write about, luckily, I only have to present one.

In the video “The Power of Powerless Communication “, Adam Grants Gives us a perspective on the factors that work in communication. According to him, speaking in a less assertive way, expressing doubts and leaning strongly on the advice of others creates connectivity with the audience.

Communication is the foundation of all contact and involves much more than just words being spoken. The skills of a good communicator must be practiced and developed with relative frequency. Participants in a high-quality communication conversation are engaged in choosing a communication channel, sending clear messages, listening actively, and understanding others’ responses. When considering the one-way communication that occurs in media through various artists and communication professionals, we must recognize the importance of varying communication approaches.

Two of the most prevalent forms of communication styles are direct and indirect communication; these two communication styles impact how members of a culture interact with each other (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). According to Craddock (2002), Kierkegaard, regarded direct communication, “as the mode for transferring information and considered it totally appropriate to the fields of history, science, and related disciplines” (p. 70). Direct communication can be defined as, “speech that specifically states and directs an action. When someone hears direct speech, they know immediately what needs to be done. There is no question about who is in charge, and usually no need for discussion” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). On the other hand, Kiergaard believed that, “the indirect was the mode for eliciting capability and action from within the listener, a transaction that did not occur by giving the hearer some information” (Craddock, 2002, p. 70). Unlike direct communication, “a indirect style of speech is not typically authoritative, rather it encourages input from the listener” (Gaddis, 2006, p. 11). The direct and indirect communication styles are often used in different fields, disciplines, and industries ranging from education, workplace, literature, and entertainment, to church services (Morreale & Pearson, 2008). For example, the population relies on the news media as the main source of information and the basis on which they form their opinions and voting decisions” (Fog, 1999, p.

Communication skills are a critical component of any career field, its main purpose is to transmit a message so that it is clear. Communication can be used to

“From negotiating for a promotion to resolving a conflict with a spouse, good communication skills can greatly improve life, while weak communication skills can make everyday interactions frustrating and tense. Interpersonal communication encompasses a number of communication styles; there