Informative Essay: Why You Should Support Historic Preservation

The simple answer is that all structures need maintenance. They fall apart otherwise. Forces such as earthquakes, floods, and windstorms, threaten heritage properties, so does war and poverty. People can’t always afford to protect the historic buildings near them which is why UNESCO helps. Imagine if the great places of the world such as famous cathedrals, temples, palaces, castles, caves with prehistoric paintings, and statues, were destroyed. They are important to everyone in the world, not just to the people whom live near

In this compelling book talk, Andrew S. Dolkart, the Director of the Historic Preservation Program and Professor

The reasons for keeping the statues in public vary across the board, with one of the most prominent arguing that taking out these expensive slabs of rock directs money into non-necessity funds, rather than funding welfare and infrastructure programs. Just last month, my TIDES class participated in a group discussion about the protests surrounding this topic. Most of the class agreed that the best solution involved putting the tributes into a new context, like in a museum with proper plaques. That way, the associated blame, reality, and guilt that comes along with time would be accurately distributed. However, one student seemed less than thrilled with that decision. She insisted that these often-overlooked sculptures did not matter: no one looked at them, no matter the placement. Her biggest piece of evidence in her argument was the huge price tag associated with the movement of the memorials. Statue projects in major hubs have had millions of dollars put into them, like in New Orleans, which removed four icons in April. However, the city has still not fixed all the levee damage from Katrina and the city streets visibly suffer because of the floods. There is a food crisis also currently plaguing the city, something that could be greatly reduced with the same attention and level of contribution that the tributes receive, a solution that would benefit the overall economy of “The Big Easy”.

What happens to a city when it loses reliable points of association with extraordinary moments in the past? Did New York City need a marble-clad building with Venetian motifs and a curved façade fronting on one of its few major important intersections and Central Park, an edifice designed by a Edward Durell Stone whose work is not much in evidence in the city? Even the most majestic cities like New York City are pockmarked with horrors. The knowledge that every shade of architectural experience, from sublime to excruciating, can exist in such compressed space that takes part of a city’s seductive pull. Yet there are a handful of buildings in New York that fail to contribute even on these grounds. Usually it ends with a wrecking ball, but in this case with 2 Columbus Circle - it was demolished, rebuilt, and then renovated again - taking away something crucial from the building’s history and it 's initial intent. Words that have been associated with this building are “queer,” “hate,” and “traumatic.” When and how do these words surface when describing a man-made structure? By masking the original design of 2 Columbus Circle and not declaring it a landmark, the city erased an exceptional piece of history that was deeply embezzled in our culture during the 1950’s up until the 1970’s.

Over the past 20 years a significant social movement in America has amplified public awareness toward the promotion of health and disease prevention, known as Healthy People 2000 and 2010. It has been beneficial in changing the focus of health care from a reactive standpoint to a proactive one, which endorses national health and prevention of disease (Edelmam & Mandle, 2010). However delivery of health care objectives is not enough. Health providers must recognize and incorporate cultural group patterns, and variations within that culture to provide optimal care that promotes wellness (Lipson & Dibble, 2008).

Applying the heritage assessment can be useful with integration into the health care system. First impressions go along with the proper approach. If you look at it this way first impressions are important in every culture. With the plethora of cultures out there and each family shaped by these values and beliefs a good approach is always an informed one. With a little common courtesy, topped off with some minimal knowledge of ones heritage you can get started on a good foot with your patient. So many cultures are part of the United States culture that being informed is our responsibility as

Now the current problem is that the grounds are becoming unsafe for the 200,000 plus people that visit each year. The buildings on the grounds are crumbling into ruins; the much need facelift for the architecture is not intended for “beautification.” (Dollaghan) The government has even stated that they “will not be looking for the original-style sandstone,”

Monuments in the US should be taken down and here is my reason why. One of the things I think that Monuments should be taken down is because most of them have very dark parts of our history. One reason why is that some “monuments have some racial offencenses and make some our citizen uncomfortable”. (brophy) and that's not really good for the public we want citizens to be comfortable in our country.

"Monuments are the grappling-irons that bind one generation to another." Everyone will always have memories and stories from the past history. Why should monuments be made? Are they even important? Yes, monuments are important. Monuments give the people that lived through the event, something to look at and be reminded of what happened. They also show people that did not live through it, how important it was to the older generation or other people. another thing that monuments do is it brings people together, it helps the youth understand past struggles. Monuments are something that commemorate a famous person or event they also show what has happened in the past.

It is hard to imagine a world without forests and open land, but if national park protections are removed, that day may come sooner than we think. National parks take up a large amount of land area in the United States and its territories, covering over 84 million acres (www.nps.gov). This acreage is made up of land entirely, and does not even include the multitude of lakes and rivers that are located in national parks. Many people enjoy visiting national parks and learning about them, and are proud that they are a part of our history. However, legislation is threatening to remove national park protections, which puts the national parks in danger. The National Park System should be protected because national parks are a part of our history, can be used to educate people about the environment, and are enjoyable to visit. There are many people who are interested in national parks and care about them, including myself. I do not believe that national park protections should be removed as park protection removal will be more detrimental than

The architectural features of Wealthy Heights, the district with ethnic/heritage value, were important, yet less important than those of Heritage Hill, the district with architectural value. Regarding the preservation of Wealthy Heights, community participants wanted moderate changes to the architectural features the most. The difference between moderate and radical changes was subjectively determined. However, the marking activity and results accelerated participants’ discussions of the given topic. In general, there was a common understanding on the importance and appropriate treatment regardless of the different degrees. In many cases, participants preferred visually/physically compatible changes. Community participants were concerned with

Something about national parks is extremely engaging to me. The National Park Service, under the U.S. Department of the Interior, created our nation’s national parks. The parks are owned by the federal government and yet were created for the people. These parks, all places of beauty, were set aside in the name of the conservation movement of the early 1900’s. National parks represent a deep part of American History and they hold very deep meaning in my own heart. I could talk about national parks and the National Park Service for hours to anyone curious enough to listen. This concept of what national parks represent and what they mean to me and to all Americans makes me lose all track of time.

The summer going into my eighth grade year, me and my family took a trip to the beautiful state of Hawaii. We went to three different islands and stayed three nights on each island. So the trip took us two weeks.

Would you want to raise the Titanic and preserve it or let it rust till it's dust. I am one who wants to raise this historical place and preserve it. Raising the Titanic and rebuilding it into a floating museum would be an educational, and help others take in how massive it was. But everything has something that could be bad and have a terrible consequences. Raising the Titanic could be dangerous and it could collapse. The family, of the passengers that boarded the Titanic, could be given back the belongings that rightfully belong to them.

Taxes have always been a contentious subject in any political discourse. Tax rates, methods of taxation, and other such details are constantly debated and reshaped in order to generate the most revenue and best serve the public. It is the responsibility of the government to pass fair taxes on its citizens that provide optimum efficiency as well as tangible benefits to the welfare of its citizens. One crucial reform to taxation that is being proposed is the Land Value Tax(LVT) which will have compounding benefits to the country it is implemented in. A LVT is a tax levied on the unimproved value of land as opposed to property taxes which take into account the value of the property on the land itself. The idea of LVT originated all the way back to the 18th century and it has seen successful modern application in countries like Australia, Hong Kong and Estonia and even the U.S. state Pennsylvania.  Land Value Tax must be implemented in the United States because the LVT encourages economic decision making, it is a progressive tax that benefits the poor in society while combating harmful speculation and it is more efficient than its counterpart, property taxes.