preview

Essay about Inherenet Limitations in Auditing: ZZZZ Best Company, Inc

Decent Essays

ZZZZ Best case case1.9 Q1 There are three different levels of services you could obtain from a certified public accountant. These are referred to as compilation, review, and audit. There are significant differences between the objectives of an audit of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the objectives of a review in accordance with statements on standards for accounting and review services. The objective of an audit is to provide a reasonable basis for expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. A review does not provide a basis for the expression of such an opinion because a review does not contemplate obtaining an understanding of the internal control …show more content…

• Inherent limitations in accounting and internal controls.
• Possibilities that client staff and management may not be entirely honest.
• Estimates used in the financial statements.
Q3 False confirmations
Since most of revenue came from insurance restoration contracts, George Greenspan, the first auditor of ZZZZ Best, contacted Tom Padgett to confirm the existence of the insurance restoration contracts. Padgett, being in on the fraud, lied and gave Greenspan a positive answer.
Q4 Purpose: The predecessor auditor may be able to provide information that will assist the successor auditor in determining whether to accept the engagement. The successor auditor should bear in mind that, among other things, the predecessor auditor and the client may have disagreed about accounting principles, auditing procedures, or similarly significant matters.
Which party should initiate the communication: The initiative for communicating rests with the successor auditor. The communication may be either written or oral. Both the predecessor and successor auditors should hold in confidence information obtained from each other. This obligation applies whether or not the successor auditor accepts the engagement. The predecessor auditor should respond promptly and fully, on the basis of known facts, to the successor auditor's reasonable inquiries. However, should the predecessor auditor decide, due to unusual

Get Access