Inherit The Wind
Rachel’s Quest for independence
I think Rachel was looking for the ways for her independence and willing to protect Bert during the trial. Rachel believed that Bert was innocent.
Rachel was in love with Bert, she knew that Bert was not a criminal and she wanted him to confess the court and the town’s people that he had done wrong, and it was all a joke and he was sorry for that. Rachel said to Bert, “Bert, why don’t you tell `em it was all a joke? Tell `em you didn’t mean to break a law, and you won’t do it again.” This clearly shows that she was worried about him and wanted to help him. But she knew that what he had done was bad. And she was also quite sure that he would not win the trial against the mayor. Her
…show more content…
This shows that since her childhood she had never known any comfort from her father and he had always been cruel to her.
In court, when she was under oath, she was asked a lot of questions. Her answers from one side she tried to tell the truth from one side, and from the other she was to protect. Bert she did not want to do him any harm, though she knew her father would not be pleased with her answers. It was clear she demonstrated her independent views and ideas there.
The battle between two lawyers showed that Mr. Drummond was right. He was a famous journalist and most famous orator. He battled at the court with weighty arguments and a tremendous speech, and he won, having destroyed Mr. Brady. Mr. Drummond’s arguments and his witnesses, fifteen scientists, thought they were not allowed to testify at the trial proved that Bert was innocent and that Rachel’s independent views were right. Rachel understood that earlier she had not really thought very much. She said, “I was always afraid of what I might think. A thought is like a child in our body. It has to be born.
If it dies inside you, part of you dies too!”
When Bert won they could not remain in the town, because everybody would be against Bert, and Bert would not be able to get a job there. Though Bert won the townspeople trusted the Bible more than science, because they were very religious. And it was quite clear they would continue to trust the Bible.
Rachel’s behaviour during the trial,
The complexity of Rachel’s character differs within the play. On the one hand, Rachel is portrayed in a male disguise showing she has independence as she has taken matters into her own hands, her successful manipulation through disguise perhaps demonstrating her intelligence and how easily women can dupe men. This could also suggest that she is not acting according to the social ‘norms’ for women in the 60s demonstrating that she doesn’t fear people’s views of her although she is a woman. She demonstrates her strength and independence as she takes matters into her own hands ‘I’ll take two hundred in cash’ and acts in a violent way ‘Rachel slaps Francis’, portraying the growing power of women. On the other hand, Bean could have done this to project the message that women cannot hold any power without the help of a man. Although she has decided to solve her problem herself, she has had to dress up as a man to do so, thus showing that women’s roles are often tokenistic. The motive behind her plan was also for a man illustrating the length a women will go for a man. Had Rachel not dressed up as a man maybe she would not have gotten so far, her success in doing so
Lastly, on to my favorite line from the movie, “the bible is a book, it is a good book, but it is not the only book.” I love this line because it is relatable to me. I believe in God, and I believe that he put me on this earth and he has a plan for me. I also know that there is scientific evidence proving that man evolved from ape. What do I believe? Should I go against my faith and say that we evolved from ape, or should I go against scientific evidence and say that God put us all on this earth. I do exactly what Henry Drummond did in the movie. He had the bible in one hand and Darwin’s book in the other. He placed the bible on top of Darwin’s book and walked out of the
This is established through Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond’s ongoing conflicts, which results in the two on opposite sides throughout the trial. For instance, after Reverend’s chaotic prayer meeting, Brady says to Drummond, “We were good friends once. I was always glad of your support. What happened between us? There used to be mutuality of understanding and admiration”(Lawrence and Lee 67). These lines support the fact that Brady and Drummond were once friends but their difference of opinion in Darwin’s theory resulted in them becoming enemies. Brady is resisting to let the town believe in evolution, and Drummond is pushing for evolution, a change in beliefs. Furthermore, Rachel and Reverend's struggling relationship also builds up this message, as resistance is shown. In particular, after Rachel begs her father not to destroy Bert, Reverend replies by saying, “Lord we call down the same curse those who ask grace for this sinner-though they be blood of my blood, and flesh of my flesh!”(Lawrence and Lee 66). Truly, these lines reveal how frightening Reverend is to his daughter. Reverend despises Bert, but Rachel loves Bert. Their completely different thoughts on Bert leads to Rachel leaving her father. In this father-daughter conflict, Reverend is extremely resistant
Rachel is first introduced into the play at the very beginning where we see she has gone to the jail to visit her boyfriend Bert Cates. Rachel is very desperate to try and get Bert to just throw himself at the mercy of the court and admit that what he did was wrong. She just wants to be with him. As she enters the jail she speaks to Meeker saying “Mr Meeker, don’t let my father know I came here”, This quote portrays Rachel’s character very well. She is shy and lacks confidence, obviously worried of what would happen if her father found out she was visiting Cates, the enemy to her father at this point. She has lived her life in fear of her father and because of she followed everything
much Drummond knew about the Bible but instead he believed all the rumors he heard about
	During court however, once the trial had started, the two former comrades found that there was one thing that neither had moved away from; they both relished the opportunity to provide a well-timed insult against their opponent in order to further better their case. However, while Drummond was quite frank and straight-forward about it, Brady played to the jury and audience too much, trying to get a laugh, along with the general acceptance upon which he had based his entire life. More so, even, than he tried to damage his opposition’s case, leaving
As probably the best courtroom dramas of the twentieth century, Inherit the Wind is based on the famous, Scopes Monkey Trial. The play was printed virtually thirty years afterward and takes original authority in varying the true-life elements of the court case. The central conflict of the play is based on the Scopes Monkey Trial itself. Several themes are presented throughout the play, for example when Brady argues for religious values while Drummond argues for natural values and freedom of thought. The definition of a theme is an implicit or recurrent idea. We also see a theme of man versus society, furthermore, Bertram Cates versus the small town of Hillsboro. A third theme is appearance
Not only did she sit there for hours trying to prove her point but she didn’t waste her time though. The man that was accused of killing the young was charge for a year and then he was out of jail because they believe he was incented. After all that hard work trying to get him locks up the court freed him because of Rachel poor testimony
Rachel is a generally nervous person throughout the course of the story. She constantly worries about what the town, and more specifically her father, might think. Lawrence and Lee establish this when Rachel goes to the jail to visit
They say all marriages go through something like this” (98). This thought of Rachel’s is interesting. For me, it emphasizes her misconception that women should simply accept infidelity as the norm. Infidelity is defined as a breach of mutual trust in an intimate relationship. In the beginning of the novel, Rachel believes that this definition applies only to women. Subsequently, we observe Rachel to become depressed and deeply saddened as she views herself as the victim being blamed for her husband’s
Rachel expressed her feelings by saying, “I love him wholly and unconditionally and without reservation. I love him enough to sacrifice a friendship. I love him enough to accept my own happiness and use it, in turn, to make him happy back (317) .” This is where that violation of sisterhood is completely lost. Rachel believes that letting go of Darcy could result in a tragedy.
Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee’s play Inherit the Wind exemplifies the eternal debate between the two sensitive subjects religion and science within the context of the “Scopes Trial”, bringing to light the internal conflict between firmly held belief and newfound contradictory evidence. Rather than eschewing this contentious topic the authors utilize the two most prominent characters in disagreement, Henry Drummond and Matthew Brady, to put forward ideas that are both enlightening and challenging to the common way of thinking at the time, effectively offering the reader the ability to recognize the importance of human thought and its ability to adapt to contemporary information.
I agree with you; all Rachel can do in the movie is support and be strong and to some extent Rachel represents everything good about Gotham City. She does what Batman does in the day instead of at night. Which is to put away crook by believing in the power of judiciary system. She is purer than the Bruce and keeps both Bruce and Harvey in check. And when she dies, you can tell as if both Bruce and Harvey lose their soul. Bruce is overcome by sadness, but he does what he must do as a hero and Harvey goes crazy and loses his temper.
Much of what Rachel's Challenge is built upon is a lie. Or at the very least, a distortion of the truth.
The first group of people that are involved with the event is Sandra Mendez and the jury members. When Sandra was committing the crime, she was going off the theory of egoism. In Rachel’s, Egoism is which states that each person ought to do