preview

Inhorn's Analysis

Decent Essays

Inhorn talks of the “emerging areas of dissonance and dissent to the prevailing religious discourse” (2012a: 165), indicating that men more readily challenge the religious laws that are in place. The setting that most embodies this observation is the semen collection clinic, where men must provide a sample of their semen for analysis. Here, men encounter a number of obstacles that are so contrary to their religious beliefs, but they must confront them to achieve their desire for children. The first is that of masturbation, which, as discussed in the previous chapter, denotes something considered zina or illegal sexual activity by many men and many religious leaders. Furthermore, semen itself is seen as something polluting once it leaves the …show more content…

Men found the “timed” (Inhorn, 2007a: 45) nature of semen collection highly troubling. Men spoke of how they believed that others sitting in the waiting room would time how long it took for them to produce a sample. If men took too long they believed they would be seen as incapable of producing sperm, and therefore feel emasculated and judged by other attendees of the clinic. This lead to one man remarking “what am I, a donkey?” (Inhorn, 2012a: 186) He was infuriated at the expectation expected to produce a sample on demand and in close proximity to those in the waiting room. He continued by saying, “ejaculation is ‘in the head’, it’s something psychological” (ibid: 187), which again underlines the reservations men have about these practices. However it also goes further, beyond the religious and the physical, into the realms of the mental. It describes these men as multifaceted beings who are only capable of totally engaging if they themselves are viewed as individuals who require a holistic consideration of their body and capabilities. They can’t perform ‘on command’ because they are complex beings that are defined by more than their penis and virility. Overall, Middle Eastern men must overcome their anxieties of these clinics on a background of religious mores, which dictate what they should and shouldn’t do; their own beliefs on what may have caused their infertility; and the spatial and temporal …show more content…

However, there are disparities between religious leaders in the region such as Ayatollah Khamene’i who permits sperm donation as an option to cure ones infertility. Morgan Clarke talks about how Islam seeks to ‘keep(ing) up with the times’ and this is especially apparent in Lebanon where there is a high number of azoospermia cases – men who have no viable semen whatsoever (Clarke, 2009; Inhorn 2012a). As a result, in Lebanon, there is much greater leniency towards sperm donation amongst religious leaders and medical practitioners because it is the only option left for these men. The belief however is that a child should be created within a legal marital structure and any outside or third party interference in the form of another man’s semen would disrupt this. ‘Lineal masculinity’, outlines the difference between the roles of men and women in reproduction (King and Stone, 2010). Men need to reproduce to preserve their lineage, and contribute to the lineage of their family that has accumulated over generations. For men, lineage is collective, and any break in the passage of lineage from one generation to the next, would result in the abolition of all that came before. These serious notions underline why this type of NRT is so difficult to comprehend for these men. A man who categorically ruled out sperm donation as a solution in Inhorn’s study stated,

Get Access