Inmate Letter: Disciplinary Case

If you are unsatisfied with this decision, then you have the right to appeal. This appeal should again be made in writing, and your employer must arrange another meeting.

On the day of 2nd March, 2009, the above-named defendant was granted twelve months supervised probation for the crime of violation of Section 18.2-96 as a Class 1 misdemeanor of the Virginia Penal Code.

"Cornell Law says that if you have a late filling of an appeal note, then that note will be disregarded along with the appeal request. If you get the court to grant you more time, than that is acceptable, but other wise the request will be dismissed. ("HAMER v. NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVS. OF CHICAGO").

One drug court is unlike any other in the country. Judge Williams’s courts in Georgia’s Glynn and Camden Counties do not honor a major component of rule of law—due process. Due process is fair treatment through the judicial system. It includes, among a few other rights, the rights to receive an impartially fair trial and subsequent reasonable punishment, to grieve or complain against the charges and government official in charge, and to appeal. Judge Amanda William’s drug court is guilty of due process violations in each of the three mentioned major categories of due process. In order to stop the due process violations and bring drug courts around the US into compliance with the rule of law, the drug court system in the US must be

She was charged with the above offenses and issued a Maybrook Court date (02/08/17 at 9:00 A.M. room

Regulations found at 55 Pa. Code § 275.5 stated that the issue “is not whether the CAO or administering agency acted properly based upon the information then available, but whether the appellant was eligible for the period of time at issue based upon evidence of eligibility the client is able to provide at or before the hearing”. The Department’s Representative’s testimony was that the new determination based on the new information was still pending with another Department worker and that the issue of the appeal was related to category MG-91, specifically. The ALJ finds that prior to the administrative hearing the Department was in receipt of information that could have altered the Appellant’s eligibility for MA. Prior to the administrative hearing, the Appellant should have been reviewed for eligibility under the MAWD program as requested on her appeal and issued a new eligibility determination, but the Department failed to do

Precede the temporary order hearing a temporary order entry date was set. I also verbally request for an appeal on the same day. On April 8, and 15 2016 entering date was set but it was reset. Ms. Eraka Watson Esq on April 8, 2016, asked Associate Judge Dianne for clarification because of the language in the temporary order since she wasn’t there. Alas, Associate Judge Dianne asked her to consult the transcript before any objection can be lodged.

The defendant in this case was facing multiple criminal felony charges including burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, grand theft, two counts of dealing in stolen property, and two counts of false ownership for pawned items. Originally, the grand theft charge was supposed to be for the value of $10,000 or more but less than $20,000. However after the state rested, the

At approximately 1506 hours, I interviewed Inmate Reiley. I read him his Miranda Rights from my MCSO issued Miranda Rights card. I asked if he understood his rights as they were read to him and

The Appellant’s cash assistance appeal request was filed untimely. The regulation at 55 Pa. Code § 275.3(b) provides that the time limits for filing a cash assistance appeal is “thirty days from the date of written notice of a decision or action by a County Assistance Office, administering agency or service provider”.

Therefore, this is a final order and it was proper for the father to file his Notice of Appeal within 30 days from March, 16, 2016. The father entered the Notice of Appeal on March 26, 2016, ten (10) days after. Consequently, this Court has jurisdiction to heard this case, which was filed in a timely manner.

I am requesting a hearing on my denied for form N-400 because i siagree with the decision that the agency has made and I have not yet received the paper that the department of homeland security requires me to send, I am in the process of acquiring the papers that they need me to send, they did not give enough time to acquire the papers, obatining the papers that they want me to send requires a longer extension then the one they gave me. I think that the reason for their denial is unfair and unjust, i think that they did not give me enough time to obtain the papers and send them. If i can obtain a fair hearing i can have the chance to send the papers that they need. The papers that they need requires time and i believe that they did not give

You only have 60 days to submit your Request for Reconsideration after your initial SSD application is denied. After that, you have to start the application process over again. While you have 60 days to appeal your denial, the reconsideration process can take several months, so it is best to take action as soon as you receive your initial denial from SSA. You do not need an attorney to appeal the initial denial. However, there is no question that you have the best chance for approval with an experienced SSD benefits attorney handling your case.

Your grievance appeal has been reviewed at Central Office and the Warden's response is affirmed. Time Computation staff at Central Office has audited your file and determined that you were denied parole/home arrest on 10/31/2016. You are eligible to be reheard in 12 months. You have failed to provide any evidence to substantiate your claim that timeframes were not adhered to.

Just an FYI, escalation#1580 is not a true escalation. Claim#124210654800 had an appeal sent back on 05/05/2015 appeal# APP-1186293. I understand that the appeal was dismissed because of the rep. didn’t note the document ID#. But we must understand that this is the first level of appeal. Once the appeal has been closed out, the provider must send in a 2nd level appeal. I’m not sure, if you advise the provider that the submission of your escalation doesn’t halt the timely filling of the 2nd Level. Which has now passed. Going forward, please be sure to review the appeal to determine if it is a true escalation or not. This can be based on discrepancies in the discussion based off the reason why the appeal was sent back. For this escalation, I