We are meeting today to discuss your case. You must plead not guilty, and here’s why. If the court were to find out that you are guilty and crazy then you would either die or spend life in prison. If you are innocent, you would be let go and have no charges what so ever. You may not be able to stay in the same house as you were, reason being, You would instead be placed in an asylum for the insane. The main point is to stay quiet and let me do the talking. Although if you were to be put on the podium, there are some things you might not want to say while being there. One thing you may not want to say is that at 12:00 Am you would watch him as he sleeps. Also, you would probably not want that you had finally made up your mind to kill him.
The facts in this case are that Harvey Pierce ambushed and shot Robin Kerl and her fiancé David Jones in the parking lot of a Madison Wal-Mart where Kerl and Jones worked. Kerl was seriously injured in the shooting, and Jones was killed. Pierce, who was Kerl’s former boyfriend, then shot and killed himself. At the time of the shooting, Pierce was a work-release inmate at the Dane County jail who was employed at a nearby Arby’s restaurant operated by Dennis Rasmussen, INC. Pierce had left work without permission at the time of the attempted murder and murder/suicide. Kerl and Jones’ estate sued DRI and Arby’s, INC. As in pertinent to this appeal, the plaintiffs alleged
Roma and Clint Underhill had both had a long day. They were the owners of a successful real estate
Mark volunteered to help with the community arts festival; he was supporting the not-for-profit organization as he had in the past. However, he did not know his good intentions as a volunteer would cost him his job as an assistant manager. The retail store’s phone number was printed in the festival advertising in error and ticket requests overloaded the phone lines, causing loss of business and annoyed the store manager. As a result, Mark was seen as the cause of the problems and terminated.
---Fight to regain control of AHL, which was probably only worth about $25,000 in equipment
I know I promised you no jail time but I never thought the cops and the state attorney would take this so far. We need to find expert witnesses who will testify at your trial.”
On June 21, 2017, Rizvi was observed via CCTV with a second male. While watching the second male was observed selecting and trying on merchandise all over men’s wear dept. after he had finished he gave all the merchandise to Rizvi and the male moved to the mall doors. Rizvi then moved to the cash desk and purchased all of the items with his coded HBC card. He then proceeded to the mall doors and handed the bag over to the other male. (Transaction 6091, Terminal 708)
Question #1: Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment.
A shocking video has been released from a hidden camera which has captured three Calgary care workers who brutally assaulted an elder resident. This elder resident died a month later from the incident. This incident happened in Garrison Green CareWest facility in Calgary on March 12, 2015. The camera captured that the three health care workers abused the elder client. Not only this, they threatened him by pouring urine over him while emptying his urine bag. He told his family that the staff is abusive towards him. Then, a hidden camera was installed in his room by his son. This camera captured all the incidents of abuse towards the 92- year- old man.
Case Name The Smithson’s Mortgage Case Study Teams This case is designed to be conducted by a team of students. The discussion, questioning, and resolution of differences is an important part of the learning experience. Another significant advantage is the sharing of the workload in preparing the final case study report. Knowledge Background This case draws heavily on the material presented in Chapters 2 and 3 of Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th Edition by White, Case, Pratt, and Agee, particularly Section 3.4 (Principal Amount and Interest Amount in Loan Payments). To a limited extent it draws on concepts from Chapter 4 (Measuring the Worth of Investments), Chapter 5 (Comparison
Atrocious, is the way I would evaluate the morality of David and John’s actions and their behavior . Even though David lucked out, that the boy jumped out in time, his action of driving even knowing that he was under alcoholic influence was wrong to begin with. However, in Jeremy’s ideology I would be wrong, and David’s actions would be good due to the fact that in his situation the boy suffered no pain, and neither did he because he was not sent to jail. Therefore, this is opposing to my judgment because I wouldn’t asses the morality of their actions by the outcome, but by their means. Accordingly, it isn’t right that David was able to avoid repercussions because he committed the same crimes as John did. This is due to the fact that it wasn’t
The purpose of making changes to legislation is to ensure that children and youth are safeguarded against sexual violence while in the care of the government. We are proposing changes to provincial legislation in British Columbia (BC) as child protection workers work with BC legislation. While there are many important points in your paper, please note that this assignment required students to make recommendation/s for policy (not legislation reform).
Following that, the expected values for decision nodes 6 and 7 should also be calculated. The following results were obtained:
Last but not least, investors are easy to get the control of SDB due to its
The Privacy and security of patient’s health information is a important challenge and responsibility for every health care organization and a concern for every U.S. citizen. To receive healthcare patients must reveal information that is very personal and often sensitive. Most the patient-physician relationship depends on very high levels of trust at the same time they also trust health care organization, to protect their confidential healthcare information with belief of security and privacy. It is an ethical and legal responsibility for every health care organization to protect patients’ health information and should make a management plan for security and privacy of this confidential health
1. Jerry Kline and Grace Gallo are too eager in getting customers and reaching their quotas without thinking what would be its effect to the company. They focus more on money instead of having a good