Boise State University
Policy Brief: Spring 2015
Mark Coyne
Econ 322
Professor Islam
May 4, 2015
In it Together: Striving for a More Integrated Atlanta
Executive Summary Atlanta is one of the top ten fastest growing cities in the United States (Fry & Taylor 2012), and is one of the more diverse cities in the country. Despite this the distribution of demographics in Atlanta’s neighborhood points to a high level of segregation on the basis of income and race in the city’s housing markets. Atlanta is ranked twenty-second in terms of neighborhood segregation among the fifty largest cities in the country (Turner 2014). While the level of housing segregation on the basis of race and income is falling, it has been falling at a relatively low rate, and integration continues to be a distant dream. The reasons why segregation persists include policies that actively encourage it, the lax enforcement of policies that promote integration, and discrimination on the basis
…show more content…
These barriers include artificial barriers to entry such as exclusionary zoning practices, particularly minimum lot sizes. There are also natural barriers to entry that the market has naturally created by encouraging high income households to bid their low income counterparts out of the neighborhoods in question. Furthermore, the next logical step would be to adjust the costs and benefits of different neighborhoods. Development of traditionally low income neighborhoods would no doubt attract more affluent homebuyers to the area. Similarly making high income areas relatively more desirable or cheaper for lower income groups would make for more integrated high income neighborhoods. Making neighborhoods more balanced in terms of the traits that different demographics value would go a long way towards
In Chapter 7, “Struggling to Stay Out of High-Poverty Neighborhoods,” Tameka, a MTP program participant, moves into a good low income neighborhood yet high income renters force her to move out of her neighborhood. Landlords like the one Tameka had to deal with often discriminate low coming minorities because of individuals with higher incomes. In The One-Way Street of Integration Fair Housing and the Pursuit of Racial Justice in American Cities, Chapter 1 “The Integration Imperative, “explores the segregation of the neighborhoods based on race and high poverty neighborhood. As the first two books mentioned that the geographical locations of minorities were poverty stricken.
Lipsitz uses practices of the housing market to illustrate how the diverse practices provide the privilege to white people in the current institutional arrangements. The capital resides in suburban houses has proven many white families’ economic mobility, although few white Americans recognize that segregation has historically been the guarantee of suburban real estate values. Housing policy and real estate practices, banking and finance, education, tax codes and subsidies, the behavior of the courts, and the norms of urban policing are all heavily inflected by a racialist logic or tend toward racialized consequences. Lipsitz delineates the weaknesses embedded in civil rights laws, the racial dimensions of economic restructuring and deindustrialization, and the effects of environmental racism, job discrimination and school segregation. Lipsitz describes the centrality of whiteness to American culture, and explains how the whites have used identity politics to forward their collective interests at the expense of racialized groups, including African Americans, Asian Americans, and Latinos.
I live in Charlotte North Carolina; I just purchased a home in a community called Ballantyne. This community is on what we consider the south side of Charlotte. In February of this year, members of my community were told that there was going to be a public housing development built on a seven acre lot that has been vacant for many years. An emergency community meeting was called; several of my neighbors packed the room, all wanting information about what and where Charlotte’s next public housing development could be built. Many were concerned, especially those living close to the lot that is said to be the
This philosophy results in racial residential segregation in the neighborhoods, which is a key aspect of racial inequality. According to the spatial assimilation model, “individual convert socioeconomic gains into higher-quality housing by leaving ethnic neighborhoods for areas with more white” (Charles 40). This “inhibits the development of informal, neighborly relations” and ensures segregation of a variety of public and private facilities” (Charles 10). This has serious implications for present and future mobility opportunities for those who are segregated from the desirable areas that have the resources to good job opportunities, educational equality, crime safety, and quality of social networks. This could be a reason why Blacks and Hispanics tend to complete less schooling, are concentrated in lower-status occupations, and earn less than Whites who can afford to live in areas that are rich in resources and opportunities.
In “The Complexities and Processes of Racial Housing discrimination” by Vincent J. Roscigno, Diana L. Karafin, and Griff tester, the main concept of racial disparity and inequality among neighborhoods is discussed, and how those inequalities became to be. They first highlight the wide range of potentially exclusionary practices, through qualitative and quantitative data comprised of over 750 verified housing discrimination cases (Roscigno, p. 162). Citing the U.S. Census, it is found that Blacks, compared to Hispanics and Asians, continue to experience high levels of residential segregation. This is done through discriminatory practices, whether they be by exclusionary or non-exclusionary methods. Even after the passing of the Fair Housing Act in 1988, discrimination against Blacks and Hispanics decreased somewhat, though African Americans still appeared to take part in racial steering, and Hispanics continued to have limitations in regards to opportunities and access to rental units (Roscigno, p. 163).
Rough Draft & Thesis Statement Minorities are faced with housing discrimination on levels much higher than that of white people which is considered white privilege. Residential segregation has been strategically planned and carried out by multiple parties throughout history and persists today ultimately inhibiting minorities from making any of the social or economic advances that come from living in affluent neighborhoods and communities. From our research, the scholarly sources have depicted multiple causes of racial disparity. Housing segregation perpetuates negative circumstances for people of color, as looked at through history, laws, segregation, real estate, and ... The end of the Civil War and the start of the Industrial Revolution and
Wilson (2011) research proves that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), contributed to the early decay of inner city neighborhoods by withholding mortgage capital and making it difficult for these areas to retain or attract families who were able to purchase their own homes. As the federal government created this program it excluded certain inner city neighborhoods. This exclusion created “redlining” which assessed primarily on racial composition. People who wanted to get out of public housing and purchase a home in a redlined neighborhood were denied proper mortgages, even if they had sufficient funds. Wilson (2011) says that such restrictions such redlining restricted many opportunities for building or even maintaining quality housing in the inner city, which in many ways set the stage for urban blight that many Americans now associate with black neighborhoods. Policies like this one were created to make blacks stay in the inner city
The socioeconomic inequality in america creates disadvantage which perpetuates in the life of people of color with scarce resources. Some of the many factors of inequality in america are segregation and discrimination in the educational system. The United States has a high population of minorities segregated throughout all fifty states, this reflects on the economic and educational inequality in neighborhoods of different races, this the reason segregation plays an important role in today's unequal society. In modern America, gentrification maintains racial and low income segregation to keep low income African Americans and immigrants in specific parts of cities throughout the United States. This system makes people of color move out of their old neighborhoods into low income areas that have low income educational system.
Is gentrification causing segregation in urban cities? The majority of modern day cities are in a state of steady gentrification. Many people believe that gentrification is making the city more modern, safe, and appealing to other people. However, these people in their naivety fail to comprehend the hidden consequences and impact of gentrification on various ethnic groups and low-income families. Gentrification is a master of disguise that hides itself with assumed correlations to everyday people. One such assumption is that gentrification will increase the socioeconomic diversity of a neighborhood.
Now days walking down the streets of Atlanta, we see the new neighborhoods consisting of condos, Starbucks, yoga classes and Chipotle. Gentrification is a growing problem in urban areas as the influx of the riches have caused the displacement of lower class families due to higher economic demands and local politics. According to Diane K. Levy, Jennifer Comey and Sandra Padilla (2005), “We define gentrification as the process whereby higher-income households move into low income neighborhoods, escalating the area’s property values to the point that displacement occurs. In addition to changes in economic class, gentrification often involves a change in a neighborhood’s racial and ethnic composition…” (p.1). Though gentrification has lasting affects on the economic status of cities, there are also repercussions that not only effect working individuals but also the students that attend school in these gentrified areas. When areas are gentrified, schools are rezoned thus leading to long lasting consequences that students must face. Some believe that gentrification is beneficial to a growing economy in a growing city, but the realities of the its lasting effects on education are often left under the radar. The issues that lie within the education system as it pertains to gentrification include day segregation and unequal opportunities between affluent and low-income areas.
Despite increased diversity across the country, America’s neighborhoods remain highly segregated along racial and ethnic lines. Residential segregation, particularly between African-Americans and whites, persists in metropolitan areas where minorities make up a large share of the population. This paper will examine residential segregation imposed upon African-Americans and the enormous costs it bears. Furthermore, the role of government will be discussed as having an important role in carrying out efforts towards residential desegregation. By developing an understanding of residential segregation and its destructive effects, parallels may be drawn between efforts aimed at combating
According to Massey and Denton (1988), residential segregation “is the degree to which two or more groups live separately from one another, in different parts of the urban environment”(282). Now this is a pretty general definition, but it gives basic but good insight as to what residential desegregation is talking about. In this paper, I will mostly be focusing on residential segregation as it relates to the black and white populations in relation to one another, although I will be referencing some other races briefly to create a better understanding of concepts or ideas.
Many of the housing uses zoning power delegated by government officials to assure that certain races such as blacks don’t move into their neighborhood. Zoning power is regulating the use of land by state governments and local governments to exercise authority over privately owned real
For the past fifty years the shift from meeting the housing needs of the poor through government projects-based housing to a more individual approach, has been slowly implemented. Housing vouchers now enable underprivileged populations to move from high-poverty, segregated neighborhoods to more un-segregated, low-poverty neighborhoods. Low-poverty neighborhoods have less crime, better opportunities for employment, and more diverse schooling options. Some housing advocates however, contend that housing assistance is unnecessary and is an income subsidy that should be combined with other social safety nets (Clark, W. 2008).
The lack of affordable housing in the United States is a problem that doesn 't receive nearly the attention that it necessitates. This absence of affordable housing became especially prevalent following World War II when suburbanization spread across the country like wildfire. Although the sheer number of homes increased, Jim Crow segregation influenced housing policy, meaning that white institutions prevented blacks from obtaining the mortgages needed to afford such homes. Therefore, rather than accept subprime loans, which often result in foreclosure, many black people have been pigeonholed into paying exorbitant rates for dilapidated rental properties located in inner-cities, thereby creating the affordable housing problem. Although the situation seems bleak, with careful planning and execution, we can solve the affordable housing problem. Specifically, my proposal involves the following two components: the government must first revise and draft three forms of legislation that create strict yet concise standards that landlords must follow, and then allocate federal funding to health and wellness programs within poor communities. By examining the contributing societal factors to the lack of affordable housing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and then implementing the proposal mentioned above, one could potentially solve the affordable housing problem there and transpose the plan to other impoverished cities across the country.