Integrated Systemic Therapy Is The Most Integrated Of The Therapies Essay

During treatment Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy (CBCT) and Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) will use feedback sessions to help assess how the couple is doing in a positive way (Gurman, 2008). Both CBCT and IBCT both use conflict and emotional expressions as avenues for couples to express their affection and understanding for one another (Gurman, 2008). Both CBCT and IBCT also have the same value system of creating a general closeness and intimacy between partners (Gurman, 2008). Regardless of the differences, the two therapies have the general

All done within a serene setting, that is designed to be free of distractions, and whereas the therapist I will inspire all members to participate in the therapy, using the systemic processes will help to facilitate this goal. Using the Strategic Family therapy, I will use the two maps of human behavior, which is used to guide me during the healing session. The first is PUSH is the ellipsis, which will authorize my point of view as the therapist (M.U.S.E, 2010). .

Cognitive behavioral therapy partner has focused on the detailed analysis of everyday conflicts that can lead to the breakdown of the relationship; it has been raised how problems arise, and how they are maintained. It has identified a feature which is associated with them generally, a predominance of negative interactions on positive. With the obvious aim of achieving an effective intervention, it has raised the ways to overcome them focusing on increasing the exchange of positive behaviors and improving communication and problem solving.

Gottman couples therapy is an integrative approach that focuses on emotion, behavior, cognitive, and narrative approaches with in a systemic framework (Gottman & Gottman, 2013). This therapy is based on extensive research about how stable relationships work and how unstable relationships fail. The goal of Gottman therapy is to help couple process their inevitable fights, moments of miscommunication, or hurt feelings and to enable them to repair the relationship (Gottman & Gottman, 2013). Moreover, the goal is to “heal the wounds crated by regrettable incidents” (Gottman & Gottman, 2013, p. 95).

The two therapy techniques that are being questioned this week are Emotional Focused Couple Therapy and Hope Focused Couple Therapy. Both techniques are effective in marital and couple therapy and both systems can be utilized effectively, however, I think comparable to other techniques the results depend on the people and the therapist. Hope focused therapy is centered around the brain and how couples perceive where their marriage is and where they want it to go. Watson (2017) states, “The approach is oriented around hopefulness and strengths, helping couples assess their strengths and create a positive narrative around them and their relationship to combat the discouragement and hopelessness that couples typically bring into counseling,”

Dattilio (2005) adopted concepts from key contributors like Gerald Patterson and Marion Forgatch (1987) - significant developers of one of the most prominent behavioral parent training programs. Other key contributors include Neil Jacobson and Andrew Christensen who developed behavioral couple therapy in the early 1970’s with the outlook for improving couple functioning and emphasis on partner acceptance (a model that was later coined integrative behavioral couples therapy (Gehart, 2014, p. 277). Norman Epstein and John Gottman were also key influencers of Dattilio’s (2005) perspectives; their concepts of cognitive

In the textbook, the authors presents the application of a five-stage integrative approach with a case study involving Simon, age 35, and Mikala, age 32 who have been married for six years (Long, Burnett, & Thomas, 2006). This couple is now experiencing a low sex drive since the birth of their second child. The first stage, assessing the problem, involves the couple describing their perspectives and side of the story. The second stage, setting goals, involves the couples setting goal based on their joint definition of the problem. The third stage, interventions, involves the couple identifying their relational strengths. The fourth stage, maintenance, is where the couple tries to maintain the changes they have made within their sexual and intimate relationship. In other words, they should stay focused on their goals and development. The fifth stage, validation, focuses on the couple’s success. In this case, the couple is celebrating the success in overcoming the low sexual desires they experienced since the birth of their second

One of the leading therapeutic theories that I agree with is the fact that greater individuation in the marriage and the increased

Emotionally focused therapy is designed to be short-term in structure. Developed principally by Dr. Susan Johnson, the main target of this type of therapy is couples and is focused on expressing emotions. The primary goal of emotionally focused therapy is to create a safe and long-lasting bond between romantic partners and family members while expanding and restructuring significant emotional responses. Partakers in emotionally focused therapy are emboldened to express their thoughts and emotions in a safe environment without fear of judgment. In this paper, we will discuss a therapy session between Sue Johnson and a couple, Leslie and Scott.

When it has been compared to traditional behavioral couple’s therapy (TBCT), it was even shown to be more effective in the long-run (cite that article). An additional strength is in the versatility of this model. In discussing the model, Jacobson and Christensen say that there are “very few prerequisites to a positive outcome with acceptance work” (Jacobson & Christensen, 1996, p. 94). As it is so widely usable, it could be very beneficial for therapists to know and practice as they may be able to apply it to the vast majority of couples seeking

Gottman method couple therapy or Gottman's Sound Relationship House (SRH) theory (Gottman, 1999) is grounded on years of John Gottman’s research and exploration about what makes marital relationships succeed or fail. The outcomes of these studies reveal that couples with successful

Emotion-Focused Therapy was developed in the early 1980s by Sue Johnson and Leslie Greenberg to provide a clear framework for working with emotion in couple therapy. (Karris & Caldwell, 2015, p. 346). In working with distressed couples, Greenberg and Johnson noted that those people were overwhelmed by intense emotions that keep them fixed into malicious pattern of interactions (as cited in Karris & Caldwell, 2015, p. 347). The priority of EFT was to identify the negative interactional cycle early in treatment and, then, access “on each partner’s unexpressed underlying emotions” (Johnson and Greenberg, 1988, p. 29) that are hidden from the self and the

The Behavioral couple’s therapy (BCT) is designed to promote partner, who is SUD, support for abstinence and attempts to alter dyadic patterns to support a family environment. The primary reason for therapy is not to reduce child abuse but to provide a sustainable environment to correct abuser’s behavior. As many previous types of research show couples in which one or both parents have SUD present communication, emotional distress, mental, health problems, arguing, physical partner violence, financial stress which also lead to increase in child abuse. And hope to reduce risk in child abuse as secondarily to improvement in couple’s relations (Kelley, Bravo, Braitman, Lawless & Lawrence,

The incorporated approaches of therapy pulls from all angles, and contributes to helping the client

Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy is "integrative" in at least two senses: First, it integrates the twin goals of acceptance and change as positive outcomes for couples in therapy. Couples who succeed in therapy usually make some concrete changes to accommodate the needs of the other but they also show greater emotional acceptance of the other. Second, IBCT integrates a variety of treatment strategies under a consistent behavioral theoretical framework.