Intelligence Between Intelligence And Intelligence

As scientists continue to their research, fundamental questions about intelligence are brought to the surface.

In “A Rounded Version: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences”, Howard Gardner illustrates how there are a variety of intelligences. Gardner starts off with an example how IQ tests may predict achievement in school but may not predict achievement in life. After finding out certain parts of the brain are responsible for certain functions, such as “Broca’s Area” which is responsible for sentence production, Gardner proposes the existence of multiple intelligences. Multiple studies later led him to propose seven distinct intelligences; Musical, bodily-kinesthetic, logical-mathematical, linguistic, spatial, interpersonal, and intrapersonal. Each intelligence has certain classifications. According to Gardner’s classifications, I realized my intelligences are bodily-kinesthetic, logical-mathematical, and intrapersonal.

Intelligence is defined as the ability to learn from experience, solve problems, and use knowledge to adapt to new situations. We can measure a person’s intelligence by assessing an individual’s mental aptitudes using numerical scores. Psychologists are currently still arguing whether intelligence is inherited or acquired. Nature is focuses more on genetics and hormones while. Nurture, on the other hand, focuses on external factors that have an influence on individuals. Regarding the intelligence debate in Psychology, the most important factor is nurture/environment.

If you had that one piece of the puzzle that would have prevented the bombings of the twin towers in New York and the Pentagon on September 11 2001 would you know it? If you saw someone do something weird or suspicious before the attack on September 11 2001, would you have called the police? If someone had walked into a United States Embassy in a foreign country and said that they know someone was going to use a plane to destroy New York in two days, could this have stopped the attack? Intelligence Analysis puts the raw sources of information together, make predictions based on the data, and finally publish the results.

What is intelligence to you? Intelligence to me is someone who is able to be creative and can think outside the box. There are many different ideas of intelligence, depending on the person you speak to. Many traits can go into being intelligent; therefore, there is no single underlying factor. Some simple traits are: creative, thinker, knowledge, the ability to set a goal and achieve it, and able to think outside the box. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, intelligence is “the ability to learn or understand things or to deal with new or difficult situations.” (www.merriam-webster.com) Our textbook says intelligence is “the ability to solve problems and to adapt and learn from experiences.” (Ch. 8, Pg. 247, Santrock)

The definition of intelligence has strongly been debated over for many centuries, and many individuals have their arguments for what it is. So what is really the true meaning of intelligence? Some, such as college professor of psychology, Carol S. Dweck, strongly believes that intelligence is something achieved through large amounts effort and having optimistic mindsets as inferred in her article, “The Secret to Raising Smart Kids”. However, on the other hand, successful author of best selling novel “Steve Jobs”, Walter Isaacson, claims that intelligence is an abstract idea that is derived from ingenuity and applying creativity to life and other material concepts. With almost completely opposite sets of beliefs, it is likely that Dweck will not agree with Isaacson’s nation of intelligence being derived from natural intuition rather than raw intelligence.

Before moving on to the Modern-era of intelligence and the theories behind where it is going, we should also discuss the physiological/biological theories behind brain development and intelligence. Why? Because the world we are exposed to now has altered it much.

It is practically impossible for a nation’s intelligence community to detect and prevent every attack on its soil. However, the American failure to uncover the 9/11 plot should be considered a massive failure considering the scope of the attack which involved careful planning, training many perpetrators, and a high profile target with many victims. Furthermore it can be demonstrated that there were many signals and opportunities to discover the plot that the intelligence machinery missed. “Hindsight is 20/20” and there needs to be an understanding of how easy it is to look back at how the intelligence gathered before the attacks should have signaled a serious threat, and thus provoked the unraveling of the 9/11 plot had the intelligence community picked up on and discriminated the signals from the noise. . However, there is evidence that the US intelligence community’s failure to link the information they had differentiated from the “background noise” as representing a possible terrorist threat points to the entire failure of the intelligence system. Therefore, while a nation’s intelligence system and the communities supporting it cannot be expected to succeed 100% of the time, this incident pointed at a 100% failure of the American intelligence community. Although it is recognized that many factors contributed to this failure, there is evidence that the organizational structure and culture both within the individual intelligence agencies and amid the intelligence

DNA and genetics provides us with our level of intelligence. The ability to process information, decode text and solve problems is all based on our I.Q. score. This we cannot deny. The power of our I.Q., however, can be enhanced through education and life experiences. Intelligence can be improved as you continue to learn, not just in school but in life, too. Also, even if you aren’t born very intelligent, you can become more intelligent by continued learning experiences. This shows that as you grow and develop, your experiences and your excitement for learning can affect your level of

The genetic effects have not been solely proven to be the leading factor in the evolution of intelligence. There has not been a particular gene that has directly been linked to intelligence. However, certain aspects of the brain, such as white and grey matter, have been proven to relate directly with the development of intelligence, but the size of one’s brain does not influence intelligence. Through structural mapping and MRI scanning, scientists have been able to illustrate the relationship between the structures of the brain to the outcomes of intelligence tests.

Intelligence Quotient usually correlates with the ability to learn but that is not accurate. The autistic genius and the math prodigy with ADHD are just two examples that prove that IQ and cognitive ability do not correlate. The plasticity of the brain allows mental deficits circumvented. Subjects with high cognitive abilities but with neurological defects prove that the relationship between cognitive ability and IQ is not a causation relationship. More information about the brain has been collected in the last fifteen years in comparison to the rest of history combined. The significance of IQ and unintuitive correlation between IQ and cognitive ability has yet to be explained: humans with much lower than average IQ have cognitive abilities

Good morning Paige Murray, I really enjoyed reading your post. You gave a nice brief definition of Intelligence that flowed right into your topic of discussion. I like that you started out with your opinion of what you think about this particular theory. I see your point when you stated "One theory of intelligence is mentally gifts theory. This theory covers gifted children if they are gifted musical, if they are gifted intellectually or genetically. If the child is gifted musically when they can be called a prodigy they can be called a prodigy music or they can be called a prodigy of just being smart" was an interesting topic. I wanted to inform you that the psychologist who came up with this theory is Charles Spearman. He created the g factor

Ever since humans started to walk the Earth, their intelligence has improved dramatically. Human intelligence is an important tool that many people use daily. Using it to think through or around specific situations and not freaking out in a tense moment. Others do not calm down and think like they do. When they are faced with a situation they have an initial reaction of fight of flight. They do not choose to calm themselves down and think of a reasonable solution to their problem. George from “Edward’s Rocks” and an unknown protagonist from “Sea Devil” both shown their intelligence in difficult situations they find themselves caught in.

Conversely, other scientists disagree that brain size alone is the sole indicator of intelligence, preferring instead, the theory that the answers lay in the brains synapses and the way information is exchanged and gene duplication (DNews, 2015).

When a person utters the word “intelligence,” people tend to think of a genius like Albert Einstein developing some obscure equation that the great majority of the population will never understand. The problem with the definition of intelligence is that people relate intelligence to words like “genius” which require intelligence but do not have the same definition as intelligence. Often, people try to use related words to define intelligence, but these words are unable to define intelligence since many are only different levels of intelligence. While many definitions try to encompass the meaning of intelligence and various definitions describe a small part of intelligence, no definition completely explains intelligence, because