Intermittent Catheterization In Healthcare

When I started my placement , Mrs . X who was suffering from Parkinsonism and dementia was on Indwelling urinary catheter for the management of urinary incontinence. Adhering to the results from the literature review I planned for initiating several steps to control incontinence in Mrs. X. My mentor was always with me with full support and guidelines. Fluid management was the first step started. An input output chart was kept and well maintained. Then steps wre also taken to manage constipation. Exercises were the last method practiced and the final result was really appreciable as she got a great reduction in the incontinence rate.

1) Summary of Article: Indwelling catheter use is common, but so are infections associated with them. About 80 percent of all urinary tract infections in hospitals are caused by catheters, and about 20 percent of all hospital infections total are UTIs. Evidence-based practice should be used for insertion, maintenance, and removal. Catheters should not be left in longer than they need to be. Unfortunately, this research shows poor administrative efforts are to blame for

According to a study conducted in 2011 by the government, approximately 80% of urinary tract infections associated with indwelling catheters, increase the hospital length of stay by one to three days, and according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), have an annual cost of

The first step nurses can take to decrease the incidents of CAUTIs in older adults is avoiding unnecessary use of catheters altogether. Initially, this begins with nurses knowing both appropriate and inappropriate situations in which a catheter should be utilized. According to (Gould et al., 2017), an appropriate situation is one where a patient has acute urinary retention or bladder obstruction, whereas an inappropriate situation is one where a catheter is being used a means of obtaining urine for culture when the patient can voluntarily void. Nurses can also use basic techniques like palpation, percussion, and inspection to effectively assess urinary retention, which is the main reason for catheterization as mentioned earlier. When techniques like this do not achieve desired results,

Presented by BMJ Quality and Safety, Meddings et al (2013) sought to review interventions to reduce unnecessary catheter usage and prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The review panel consisted of six individuals all listed as authors on this integrative review who utilized two

Focus on enhancing quality of care has exaggerated on a nationwide scale. Decreasing preventable damages within the health care settings is being on focus furthermore. From this there has been an immediate connection between repayment to quality through pay-for-reporting and pay-for-execution programs. Around 25% of the hospitalized patients have an indwelling catheter in place (Saint, Kowalski, Forman et al., 2008) and there is a 3% to 7% has the probability to get urinary tract infections in such cases. The infection could cause the signs of bladder distress, trouble in urination, and high temperature in such patients. Analysis shows that 48% of patient who has indwelling catheter complains of pain from the catheter, 42 % experience inconvenience from the catheter and 61% found that their daily activities are exceptionally constrained by these catheters (Saint, Lipsky, Baker, McDonald, & Ossenkop, 1999). Urinary tract infections may prompt bacteremia (infection

(2014) article “Reducing unnecessary urinary catheter use and other strategies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection: An integrative review,” was published in the British Medical Journal Quality Safety. Meddings et al. (2014) conducted a systemic review and a meta-analysis in a hospital setting. Also, Meddings et al. (2014) report CAUTIs was reduced by 53%. The authors conclude UC reminders and stop orders appear to reduce UC use and CAUTIs.

Sterile technique is required for insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter in the hospital setting, but clean technique can be used for intermittent catheterization in non-acute settings. By itself, sterile technique on insertion doesn't prevent UTI’s. Prevention of UTI’s depends on knowledge of causes, proper care techniques, and early catheter removal. Nurses are taught early on in school that sterile technique helps to reduce infections. It was drilled in our heads the entire time and now to have the evidence tell us that early catheter removal, along with proper technique good hand hygiene is the key to reduce UTI’s.

This literature review essay will demonstrate a review of four different research articles and research related methodology The articles and review are based on the prevention of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The aim of this literature review is to review publications concerning the management of Catheter-related to UTI 's including the prevention. Articles reviewed include the various precaution and preventions concerning Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) The article evidence summarized bellow was generated using a literature search conducted for Randomised Controlled Trials, Systemic Review or quantitative and qualitative research.

The National Patient Safety Goal NPSG 0.7.06.01 entitled “ Use proven guidelines to prevent infection of the urinary tract that are caused by catheter.” was selected (The Joint Commission, 2015). Gould et al. (2010) reported that in an acute care hospital, a urinary catheter is the most commonly used medical devices (as cited in Acker, 2014). What is a urinary catheter? Urinary catheter is a thin tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine. A collection system bag is connected to the catheter (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010). Gokula et al. (2014) asserted, short-term and long-term

In researching the question, “In hospitalized adults, how does routine, compared with clinically indicated replacement of peripheral IV catheters affect patients?” the article: Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized study (Lopez et al., 2014) provides a randomized study that examined not only the research question of patient complications, but of the clinical cost of adhering to a regime of replacing all peripheral IV catheters (PIVC) after less than 96 hours (regardless of patency or patient’s expected time until discharge), versus replacing PIVCs as needed. (Lopez et al., 2014)

The advantage of this method is that you can avoid constant catheterization which is associated with several problems, such as male infertility and tract infections. The method also ensures that patients can keep their bladder pressure low throughout the day. These catheters do not cause prolonged issues and can easily be avoided once the person is able to use ordinary methods.

The Quality Improvement nursing process that I have chosen to research is patient safety. I have chosen to focus specifically on the topic of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI’s) during hospitalization and their preventions. It is estimated that 15-25% of hospitalized patients receive a urinary catheter throughout their stay, whether or not they need it. A large 80% of all patients diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) can be attributed to a catheter (Bernard, Hunter, and Moore, 2012). The bacteria may gain entry into the bladder during insertion of the catheter, during manipulation of the catheter or drainage system, around the catheter, and after removal.

A catheter is a tube in your bladder that removes urine from the body. Because this tube stays in place for an extended period of time, it is called an indwelling catheter. The urine drains from your bladder into a bag outside your body. When you have an indwelling urinary catheter, you are more likely to develop a urinary tract infection (UTI) in your bladder or kidneys. The prevalent use of catherization provides a substantial opportunity for UTIs. If urinary catheters were used only when deemed appropriate in a given population, thereby reducing the theoretical risk of CAUTI, it is logical to hypothesize that actual CAUTI rates would decrease. The impact of this intervention would be greatest in populations in which the duration of urinary

The overuse or misuse of indwelling urinary catheters (IUC) is a concern in the emergency department (ED) despite the well-known risks and complications. Although the medically indicated guidelines for use are specific, professionals often ignore the guidelines and insert an IUC without applying evidence-based practice strategies to manage urinary output.