The average loss as percentage of revenue due to internal fraud in the Americas and EMEA was 0.64% between 2013-2014 and 0.34% between 2015-2016.
Overview
Hello and thank you for sending your inquiry to Wonder about revenue losses due to internal unauthorized payments for 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The short answer is that the average loss as percentage of revenue due to internal fraud in the Americas and EMEA is 0.64% in 2014 and 0.34% between 2015-2016. There is no data yet for 2017 as figures are only reported the following year. Below you will find a deep dive of our findings.
METHODOLOGY
We focused our research on figures related to fraud as transactions that are not authorized are considered fraudulent. While there are published
…show more content…
REVENUE LOSS DUE TO INTERAL UNAUTHORIZED PAYMENTS.
According to Kroll's 2015-2016 version of its Global Fraud Report, 45% of fraud are committed by junior employees in an organization, while 36% are done by members of middle and senior management. In the same report, the average loss as percentage of revenue due to fraud in the Americas and EMEA between 2013-2014 is as follows:
North America
United States- 1.2%
Canada- 1.7%
South America
Brazil- 1.7%
Mexico- 1.9%
Colombia- 0.7%
EMEA
Europe- 1.2%
Sub-Saharan Africa- 2.4%
Russia- 1.9%
Gulf States- not tracked
The average loss as percentage of revenue due to fraud in the Americas and EMEA between 2013-2014 is as follows:
North America
United States- 0.9%
Canada- 1%
South America
Brazil- 0.7%
Mexico- 0.8%
Colombia- 0.9%
EMEA
Europe- 0.8%
Sub-Saharan Africa- 1%
Russia- 0.5%
Gulf States- 0.9%
The average loss as percentage of revenue in the Americas and EMEA between 2013-2014 and 2015-2016 is the average of individual economy percentages:
2013-2014: (1.2%+1.7%+1.7%+1.9%+0.7%+1.2%+2.4%+1.9%)/8 = 1.5875%
2015-2016: (0.9%+1%+0.7%+0.8%+0.9%+0.8%+1%+0.5%+0.9%)/9 = 0.833333333%
The average loss as percentage of revenue performed by junior employees in the Americas and EMEA is 45% of the percentages between 2013-2014 and 2015-2016:
2013-2014:
and many indirect victim of the fraud. This article is also reviews several factor of the
Net Loss – The combination of the operating loss and the non-operating gain produced a net loss of $162k compared to a budgeted loss of $143k. YTD operating and non-operating losses are $384k compared to a budgeted gain of $988k.
Net Gain/Loss – The combination of October’s operating loss and non-operating loss produced a net loss of $295k compared to a budgeted gain of $11k.
On the 2011 Annual Report, there was a loss on foreign currency and also Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.
The company’s performance had been deteriorating over the past few years with the Underlying Profit before Tax (PBT) Loss of A$646million in the financial year ended 30 June 2014, down from the Underlying PBT Profit of A$552 in the financial year ended 30 June 2011. Qantas blamed the increasing loss to growing market record fuel costs (Qantas 2014).
The reporting of sales/conversion back to Danish currency represented a 2% loss. Continued expansion into new markets in both production and sales will make this issue even larger then it currently is.
WorldCom was involved in two major forms of financial statement fraud schemes, overstatement of revenue and understatement of line costs (Vance, 2016). WorldCom was overstating there revenue by regularly monitoring revenue through the sales groups’ performances measured against the revenue plan (Vance, 2016). Every two to three months a meeting was held that brought each sales channel’s manager and they were obligated to present and defend their sales channel’s performance compared to the budgeted performance (Vance, 2016). The major tool that measured and monitored the revenue performance at WorldCom was the monthly revenue report (MonRev) which was prepared and distributed by the revenue reporting and accounting group (Vance, 2016). The MonRev included detailing revenue data from all the company’s channels and segments but the full MonRev also contained the Corporate Unallocated schedule (Vance, 2016). The key players in this fraud scheme were WorldCom’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Treasurer Scott Sullivan and senior vice president of financial operations, Ron Lomenzo. Sullivan had total control for the items booked on the Corporate Unallocated schedule (Vance, 2016). The Corporate Unallocated schedule amounts reported usually spiked during the quarter-ending months, and the largest spikes occurred in quarters when the operational revenue was farther away from meeting the quarterly revenue targets (Vance, 2016). WorldCom
Sales for the financial year ended March 31, 2009 decreased by 565.7 or 12.9 percent billion yen to 7729.9 billion yen compared with the previous financial year. The electronics, financial services and game segments incurred operating loss when compared to pictures segment that made an operating profit, though the operating income fell 48.9%, to ¥29.9 billion.
As of September 30, 2017, the company faced unrealized loss, due to the fuel hedging policy, recorded around $118 million.
Net Profit Margin has reduced from 5.05% in 1993 to 4.53% in 1994 (a net decrease of 0.52% ). The main culprit in the decrease of profit margin seems to be the rising interest expense shown by the interest expense to revenue ratio rising from 0.44% to 1.34%.
A financial statement fraud could come directly from management level where they deceive the numbers of revenue and expenses to satisfy the open market expectation or wallstreet
Revenues fell 3% in 2016 mainly due to lower fuel surcharges and unfavorable exchange rates
Operating profit Margin: Excluding currency effects, this margin declined by 9.6 percentage points primarily reflecting an increase in selling, general and administration costs, decrease in profits on business and products disposal, and non-cash adjustments to the contingent consideration relating to ViiV Healthcare given the higher sales outlook for
Operating profit decreased gradually. In 2013 there was a slight decrease from the previous year (2012) by 2.47 % (from 973 £m to 949 £m ). The decline
Fraud prevention is the key element of conducting business, as when not controlled, fraud exposes the business to potential law suit, business loss, or its’ extinction all together. An online payment organisation, such as ours, needs to make maximum effort to reduce the risk of fraud, as its’ very existence depends on the level of trust that customers put in it.