Internal Threats And External Threats

Throughout its more than hundred year history, the Federal Bureau of Investigations has been a very important agency to the United States. As a threat-based and intelligence-driven national security organization, the mission of the FBI is to protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats, to enforce the criminal laws of the United States, and to provide leadership to federal, state, and international agencies (“A Brief History of the FBI”). The Bureau’s success has always depended on its agility, its willingness to adapt, and the ongoing dedication of its personnel. But in the years since

Hello, Dominique. I’ve enjoyed reading your post. Like you said prevent of inside threat is one of ways to conduct strategic counter intelligence. As we know, cyber security is crucial to protecting US computers, networks, programs and data unauthorized access. There are many cases that our government data has been stolen by the hackers from foreign entities including 4 million federal employee records. However, we can’t rule out the inside threats. There are so many spying cases from the insider whom worked either for foreign governments or businesses. These inside threats were not unnoticed for months and sometimes years and it caused great damage to US interests. Therefore, pursue of the real creation of a discipline in strategic counterintelligence

1) Identify and describe the similarities and differences between corporate espionage offenders who are “insiders” and those who are “outsiders.”

This source is found in a lengthy book relating to threat assessment. It features research about the term “leakage” which was explored in my investigation. Value from this source can be found in its origin. The source features research from two highly knowledgeable forensic psychologists, Meloy & O’Toole, and from the FBI itself. This is valuable because the research is proven to be accurate through its writers and editors. Also, the book Behavioral Sciences and the Law is specifically reliable due to the highly knowledgeable researchers and focuses on how behavior can be a red flag in threat assessment.

A single insider could steal secrets from critical infrastructures or leave them vulnerable to a future hack, which could have residual effects for years, such as the company Target and its reputation after the company was hacked. Further, insiders like Edward Snowden have set back American national security for years to come, by exposing secret security practices to the world. The government proposed in S.3414, to conduct background checks, focus on employee training, and assure that the necessary management are enlisted. These steps might stop the insider threat, but are measures to help reduce the threat. The benefits would also lead to better productivity and ensure the right employees are emplace to meet the industry standards and comply with policy. A new proposed bill should incorporate this feature within the government and be an option within privately owned critical infrastructures with incentives if guidance is

One of the greatest difficulties in intercultural relations is the acceptance of others due to the perceived threats and anxiety produced. The threat being that one will lose their culture, language, and ‘race’. These feelings give rise to the issue of racism, prejudice, and in some cases violence. With this in mind, we can begin to see why it is hard for some members of a host country to be accepting of immigrants. In Canada, 16% of Canadians believe immigrants take away jobs from locals (Ward & Masgoret, 2006). The increasing migration of immigrants has a strong impact on the host countries; one such impact is an incident in which a Sikh truck driver was physically assaulted in Canada despite Canada being portrayed as a cultural mosaic. Understanding

CIO is well aware of the preventive measures taken against the external threats and has switched the focus to the internal threats. Detection and prevention of internal attack is equally important to the external attacks in the network. Most networks are vulnerable to betrayal from within do to the assumption that everyone who is inside the

WILLISON, R., & SIPONEN, M. (2009). Overcoming the insider: reducing employee computer crime through Situational Crime Prevention. Communications Of The ACM, 52(9),

The United States has many great threats to their security. There are people everyday who would do anything to make sure the US can no longer be the biggest world power. The United States is currently battling some pretty serious threats to their security such as: ISIS, cyber threats, climate change, and nuclear security within other states. Globalization has hugely impacted America’s position in the world because of our democracy being the world’s leading superpower and our MNC’s contributing greatly to American consumerism.

Counterintelligence (CI) is a unique and challenging field in the United States government and within the United States Army. Thinking of what we see in the movies or what we read in spy books, we all want to think that a federal agent is portrayed as a James Bond or Jason Bourne. We imagine someone who jumps from rooftop to rooftop or out of helicopters to catch the bad guy. It may not be what we see in theaters, but we can paint a picture of who may be an individual within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or any other federal agency. These entities are tasked to protect the country with utmost importance to national security. What characterizes someone

Everyday America is posed with threats from around the globe. Allowing America to spy on other countries provides for the greater good of the economy. There are three main reasons as to why I believe America should have the ability to keep tabs on surrounding countries.

Insiders represent the greatest threat to any information systems. The majorities of insiders have the proper security clearances, have signed the non-disclosure agreement, are firmly loyal to the United States, and know that they are obligated to protect the nation's secrets and sensitive information. The insiders are granted certain authorities and trust and have the ability to abuse their authorized access to exploit or otherwise misuse information systems. Imagine a federal employee is disdained of security practices that result in compromise or destruction of information. An example would be the recent top secret documents leaks that were stored in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private unsecured server. According to recent news, there were at least 1,340 classified emails ranging from classification level of secret and top secret found in United States Hillary Clinton’s server. Another example would be the case of former CIA Director David Petraeus where he was prosecuted for intentionally sharing intelligence from special access programs with his formal biographer Paula Broadwell. For the federal department, unauthorized disclosure of classified materials could cause

A great example of this is getting a degree; it might not be as important or beneficial to you to get a certain degree but the benefits that you could give the society with that degree can be significant, so the government creates scholarships and incentives to motivate you and make it easier for you to get an education and ultimately be part of the working society.

Counterintelligence (CI) involves actions aimed at protecting the United States against foreign intelligence operations and espionage from penetration and disruption by hostile nations or their intelligence services (Lowenthal, 2014). Three main components of Counterintelligence include collection, defensive and offensive. The collection is the ability to gather intelligence information about rivalry capabilities against own nation; defensive part of CI involves measures to prevent and thwart other nations ' attempts to penetrate into own nation 's intelligence system; while an offensive aspect deal with running double agents to penetrate, manipulate, exploit, and control targeted adversaries. CI is said to be the most essential aspect of the intelligence disciplines, in the sense that it helps in collecting vast quantities of secret information and produce an excellent analysis of intelligence, although, ineffective counterintelligence measures may diminish confidence in the final results (Van Cleave, 2013).

Security is a central concern in the study of international relations (IR). Yet despite being the focus of considerable scrutiny, few agreed conceptions of security exist (Buzan, 1991; Huysmans, 2006; Terriff et al., 1991; McSweeney, 1999; Morgan, 1992; Croft 2012; Smith 2000). Buzan even goes as far to posit that the very conception of security is “essentially contested” and thus poses an unsolvable debate (Buzan, People, states and fear; Little, ideology and change, p35). These disagreements have created rifts in the security community over what can be threatened and indeed what can even be considered a threat. Part of the complexity to the subject is derived from the numerous opposing and often contradicting theoretical perspectives within international relations itself, of which security is a sub-field (Terrif et al. 1991 – Security studies today). This paper thereby seeks to trace the various theoretical strands of security studies with the hope of elucidating how and why Islam, and Muslims immigrants have been increasingly portrayed as a threat and ‘Otherised’ in Britain.