International Accounting And Financial Reporting Standards

The purpose of International Accounting Standard 16 (IAS 16) is to outline the treatment for most types of property, plant and equipment. Initially, Property, Plant and Equipment will be realised at its cost and after that it will be measured either using a cost or revaluation model. The asset will be depreciated in such a way that the depreciable amount will be assigned over the period of its useful life on a methodical basis. [IASPlus, n.d]

AASB 8 is an important Accounting Standard from the financial information reporting perspective. It ensures that the entity has to disclose enough information to the user of financial information about the economic activities the entity is involved into and the scope or spread of these activities. The standard requires the entity to provide information about the reportable operating segments of the entity. Operating segments are the components of the entity of which separate financial information is available and it is regularly evaluated by the management – more specifically – the CODM – i.e. the Chief Operating Decision Maker to assess the performance of the particular component and to allocate resources in appropriate

Abercrombie & Fitch uses generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as the basis for the production of its financial statements. In contrast, Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) uses international financial report standards (IFRS). H&M also utilizes Swedish GAAP. For its annual report, there is no indication of what standard is used, and there are no official financial statements. H&M does not note what auditing standards it uses in its annual report. By contrast, the ANF Form 10-K notes that the company's auditors use the Internal Control Integrated Framework as laid out by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), as noted on page 100 of the 2011 Annual Report.

I shall try to shed some light on the topic but, as the saying goes, only time will tell. 1.1. Outline I begin with a description of IFRS and their history, and warn that there is little settled theory or evidence on which to build an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of uniform accounting rules within a country, let alone internationally. The pros and cons of IFRS therefore are somewhat conjectural, the unbridled enthusiasm of allegedly altruistic proponents notwithstanding. I then outline my broad framework for addressing the issues, which is economic and political. On the ‘pro’ side of the ledger, I conclude that extraordinary success has been achieved in developing a comprehensive set of ‘high quality’ standards and in persuading almost 100 countries to adopt them. On the ‘con’ side, a deep concern is that the differences in financial reporting quality

With the number of countries that have switched to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) for their financial reporting, as well as the continued efforts made between the IFRS and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP), it is evident that international convergence is an overall appealing idea for global reporting. With that said, for decades now US GAAP has worked with IFRS to create a universal standard; and while progress has been made to diminish variances between the standards, there are still large, if not unattainable efforts ahead of us. The hype over a proposed uniform set of global accounting standards appears to be stunted by the lost efforts in the convergence project between the US GAAP and IFRS. As the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) moves forward with its standards setting, there must be a reevaluation of the goal for reporting standards and efforts with the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

Frieda, an accounting student, states: “Strategy analysis seems to be an unnecessary detour in doing financial statement analysis. Why can’t we just get straight to the accounting issues? “Explain to Frieda why she might be wrong.

Similar to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) governance of U.S. GAAP in the United States, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed in 2001 to be the governing body responsible for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IFRS standards are beginning to be recognized globally as the leading accounting standards. Since 2002, the IASB and FASB have been committed to agreeing on unified international accounting standards. The ultimate goal is for IFRS to replace U.S. GAAP for the United States and be the new requirement for reporting for public companies. In the meantime, there are around 120 countries that already permit or require IFRS reporting and 90 countries that have fully adopted

This report aims to provide the executive directors and senior level management, of Fujitsu with a condensed insight into the potential use of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as a substitute method of “corporate disclosure to its’ current reporting standards (GAAP)”, (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2014). This report will analyse the primary benefits and limitations of adopting the IFRS as one of many accounting standards, thus ultimately aiming to provide a convincing recommendation as to its’ adoption and future application in Fujitsus’ operations and methods of financial reporting, (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 2014).

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) oversee the standards for both the US GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards). With the proliferation of global business and ever growing markets, an attempt has been made within the last ten years to align both standards the two standards. The US GAAP has always given the guidelines and steps for American companies to follow when preparing their financial statements. Whereas the IFRS has always been more of standardized language to use in accounting practices internationally. The following is a brief analysis of changes, differences and outcomes from this transition.

Globalization is a phenomenon that keeps increasing with a rapid pace. The effects of globalization are reflected into the world of financial reporting as well. During the last decades, the need for a single set of accounting standards around the world has risen. The idea of having mutual accounting standards has been an issue with controversial opinions. Many academics have expressed their opinion but there has been a separation between them as some of them believe that the benefits are significant and it definitely needs to happen and others believe that it is not as good as it seems. In the following essay there is going to be a discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of having a single set of accounting standards around

The objective of this paper is to deliberate the concerns regarding implementing International Financial Reporting Standards in United States. There is no scope that IFRS standards would be fully implemented in the United States. The main reasons are two regulatory bodies Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are unable to integrate on the concept of convergence. Due to current economic conditions, FASB and IASB came together to reduce the differences between U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) and IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards). Furthermore, Security and Exchange Commission has

The purpose of financial reporting standards in accounting is to ensure that all companies use the same rules when comparing financial statements. In order for a company to properly report their financial performance, they are required to follow a set of standards that will be applied when completing financial statements. The most common set of standards for financial reporting was developed by the International Accounting Standards board (ISAB). These standards are called the International Financial Report Standards (IFRS.) The IFRS are a set of principles that companies are required to follow when they are recording accounting records.

The IASB laid out in its discussion paper proposed changes and updates to: definitions of assets and liabilities, recognition and de-recognition of assets and liabilities, measurement, equity, profit or loss and other comprehensive income (OCI), and presentation and disclosure. The IASB believes that the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) does not define some matters adequately enough. In the discussion paper, some areas are being completely rewritten while others just need some clarification and guidance.

The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) identified the five ele-ments of financial statements as the following: (1) assets, (2) liabilities, (3) capi-tal, (4) income, and (5) expenses.

IFRS rules does not exempt cash flow statements in any kind of situations; whereas according to GAAP under some circumstances exemptions of cash flow statements are limited for certain investments and entities.