International Accounting Standard 7 : Statement Of Cashflow

Despite those enormous advantages, it has been argued that IFRSS adoption lead to significant costs. The main argument is that IFRSs do not consider local needs and priorities as every country has their own ‘business environment, legal systems, cultures, language and political environment’ (Henderson and Peirson, 2000 cited from Malthus, S., 2004). However, to overcome this problem, IASB can accommodate flexible reporting standards that enable companies to choose alternatives that are more suitable for their external condition. It is opinion of some opponents of IFRS adoption that IAS is ‘insufficiently detailed’ (Uddin,M.S., 2005, p.4) that require accountants’ and auditor’ professional judgment. However, overly detail might be contra productive and not flexible in anticipating every changes and differences.

EFRAG already required all European countries adopt IFRS. Moreover, EFRAG want more non- EU countries can adopt IFRS. They disappointed with no strong support for IFRS in US from SEC. (Bouvier, 2012) IFRS and EFRAG have working together for many years. (Hamilton, 2013) They want to set up an international accounting standard for the world and make no different in the financial report.

In May 2008, the AICPA’s Governing Council designated the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as the body authorized to establish international financial accounting and reporting principles under rule 202 and 203 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Below is an illustrative Independent Auditor’s Report on financial statements issued in conformity with IFRS.

As stated earlier, the IASB arose from specific needs of the accounting industry and the public. As international trade has increased, the need for transnational accounting information has increased as well. This sparked the demand for development of international accounting standards to make financial data between countries more comparable. In 1973, the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) was formed to develop these international standards. The standards issued by the IASC, prior to 2001, were called International Accounting Standards (IASs). In 2001, the IASC made the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) the official international standard-setting body. The standards issued by the IASB are called International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) (Schroeder, Clark, & Cathey, 2011, p. 82-87).

This research project will inform the reader of the difference between the United States accounting standards and International accounting standards. The United States uses the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to issue financial reporting procedures. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). There are proposals for the United States to adopt the International standards. Financial reporting procedures are debated about the United States using the Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures (GAAP) or following the global procedures. This

Research: The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was founded in 1973 as a private and independent organization governed by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). The organization’s primary purpose is to establish the rules and standards of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for the interest of the public. (“Facts about FASB”) “Since its inception in 1973, the FASB has issued 168 Statements of Financial Accounting Standards and a series of concepts statements”. (Facts about FASB, n.d.) The FASB's mission is "to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public,

A joint convergence committee created the members of (FASB) and (IASB). (IASB) is recognized as an independent accounting standard-setting body that is similar to (FASB) that joins (GAAP), and is governed by the (IFRS) foundation. Due to this convergence, (AICPA) believes U.S. adoption of a single set of high-quality, globally accepted accounting standards will benefit U.S. financial markets and public companies by enabling preparation of transparent and comparable financial reports throughout the world, (American Institute of CPAs, 2016). Secondly, (AICPA) is dedicated to supplying the whole accounting profession with information, tools and IFRS.com for instance to assimilate as well as implement a new set of standards. As the (AICPA) supports continual convergence of reliable accounting standards between (IFRS) and (GAAP) the mission of completion between (IASB) and (FASB) is prolonged. (AICPA) will always support funding mechanisms of the body-making

The ASAF is made up of representatives of both national and regional standard setters, and it serves as a check to the IASB to "ensure that a broad range of national and regional input on major technical issues... are discussed and considered." They also provide a background to "facilitate effective technical discussions on standard-setting issues" which may involve the IASB both directly and indirectly. The Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF), which parents FASB, helped carve a path for FASB to join the ASAF despite its refusal to adopt IFRS as its sole accounting standard, and they continue to use their influence to ensure that FASB keeps its presence. During the quarterly ASAF meetings, FASB keeps the other members updated on U.S. GAAP developments as well as IFRS usage in our country (through foreign private

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) are working together to eliminate a variety of difference between the United States generally accepted accounting procedures (U.S. GAAP or GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This convergence project grew out of an agreement reached by the two boards in 2002 (Deloitte, 2004).

Another challenge convergence faces is the fact that under IFRS, there are little industry-specific standards, which has led many commentators to voice “concerns about how IFRS would impact their particular industry” (AICPA, 2009). Other critics have voiced concerns regarding the uncertainty surrounding funding for the IASB as it’s “largely funded through voluntary contributions from a wide variety of participants across the world’s capital markets. The concern with that model is that it leaves the IASB open to the perception that organizations that provide funding could try to influence the accounting standards” (SIAC, 2012). This observation questions whether there is true independence of the IASB and the integrity of its standard-setting process.

The IFRS on the other hand is beginning to gain traction as more and more countries adopt this practice. The IFRS has two main sources of its standards and principles which are the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the International Accounting

The accounting world is shaped by stringent and clear rules, principles, standards and guidelines. These are all meant to define accounting operations and reporting discipline. With the emergence of International Accounting Standards (IAS), which was later replaced by International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), the accounting concepts, analysis, disclosures, reporting and presentation became easier and practical. Currently, accountants, managers and related parties find it concrete and consistent in protecting professional boundaries.

First, The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issues The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on U.S securities and exchange companies listed.

The benefits of international accounting standards play an important role for accountancy profession, however still risk of complex accounting standards exist. The IASB issues international accounting standards and also financial reporting regulations that are imposed by the EU, and this can lead

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is the premier accounting standards setting body used in over 120 countries worldwide, comprised of 14 experts appointed from the international community (Members of the IASB, 2016). They set the conditions for those that fall under their jurisdiction through publications from the principle-based International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These conditions include, though not limited to, a company’s financial statements. In the United States, there are many different groups that influence the accounting perspective, boiling down to a rule-based comprehensive framework called Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Groups that influence GAAP is the Securities and Exchange Commission, who oversee all publically traded firms’ financial statements in the United States.