International Adoption Research Paper

With international adoption comes the need to travel to arrange all the paperwork and fees needed to handle the adoption. Some of the Third World countries have many restrictions when it comes to adoption. China has many, for they do not let just any person

Since the 1950s, the United States and other countries started a new way in the de-institutionalize the care of vulnerable children which is, close down orphanages in favour of substitute care and accelerated adoption. Besides, western countries started to give up their children without placing them for adoption, and thus, the need to operate large orphanages has decreased. These issues have resulted in a dramatic reduction of local orphans available for adoption, requiring many adoptive parents to orphanages in the Third World.

Since 1980, the United States has offered adoption subsidies to significantly lower the cost of adopting a child in the foster care system. These subsidies are a form of economic incentive and can cover legal, medical, and educational expenses. This system was put in place to increase the adoption of children in the foster care system (Argys). The federal government’s intention behind these cash incentives is to move children through the foster care system and into permanent homes. The number of annual adoptions nationally almost doubled from 1995 to 2001 (Kaufman). For International adoptions, the government will reimburse adoptive parents for travel costs, lodging, food, and transportation while in the foreign country. Many countries require

Adopting children from other countries like Russia isn’t and will never be easy because of costs and sometimes the country itself doesn’t want to allow you to adopt an orphan. Russia banned America from adopting Russian children because of money. Russia did this because they didn’t

Many people believe that international adoptions are a positive thing, and help provide a brighter future for the children they adopt. However, many countries have strict laws on international adoptions. The article Home Alone ventures to say that, "poor countries should fix their adoption systems so that, once domestic possibilities have been exhausted, foreigners can step in" (Home Alone). International adoptions can sometimes be tricky. Many countries have constantly changing laws on international adoption. "Adoption laws change from year to year, and from country to country. Changes in intercountry adoption bans and regulations in different countries may cause unexpected challenges for prospective international adoptive parents." (Child Welfare Information Gateway). Often times many international adoptions can become corrupt. Children are sometimes smuggled across borders. "If the children travel through an official border the adult who accompanies them needs to have paperwork, but in its absence a bit of money in an envelope does the trick"

The image of an American family has changed dramatically over the last fifty years. American families are no longer modeled after the Cleavers. International adoption has contributed to this changing family view, bringing in children who are not biologically related to their parents and often of a different race. This new American image has helped eliminate race related issues. So, what is the controversy with international adoption? Children are the future of a country; children are human resources. If a country is losing their children to international adoption; the county is losing the gifts and talents that are irreplaceable in those children. Intercountry adoption should not be a viable adoption source because this process does not adequately benefit those involved, international adoption exploits poor children and hurts their countries of origin.

This is likely correlated with Australia’s overall decline in intercountry adoptions. Since the Hague convention was implemented, adoptions from Australian citizens declined by approximately 74%. In addition to this, 94% of adoptees that came from overseas were from Asia, 6% were from South/Central America, and there were no finalised adoptions from Africa or other regions. This distribution reflects the number of countries in each region with which Australia has an adoption program, and the characteristics of these programs. As well as this, the typical waiting period for families who adopted a child from overseas in 2014-15 was a period of over five years. It would undoubtedly be beneficial not only to Australian citizens desiring to adopt, but also to an immense number of orphaned children, if the Hague convention reached African countries, or made it easier to adopt from those countries that are not under the convention

When you adopt out of the country you most likely will not know the medical history or the parent’s information. Most of the time the child or baby will not be able to speak English or speak at all. Before you adopt the child or baby you may have to have fundraisers because it costs a ton of money. Once you adopt the child or baby it does

After World War II, the dissolution of European families resulted in the significant increase in the number of adoptions of foreign born children. This began America’s active participation in what is currently known as international, or intercountry, adoption. Every year for the last six decades, Americans have adopted thousands of foreign born children. It is the process by which the prospective adoptive parent adopts a child from a country other than the parent’s own, through permanent legal means, and brings that child to the parent’s country of residence to live with the parent permanently. Like domestic adoption, it is the legal transfer of parental rights and responsibilities from a child’s birth parents, or guardian, to a new parent.

In the beginning, International adoption programs in poor nations like that of Ethiopia, started with a few honest humanitarian adoptions, rescuing orphans from hopeless circumstances. However, once the news of an overflow of healthy adopted children out a specific country reach Western countries, expectant parents that desire healthy children begin to sign up for more children than the small, poor country can adequately supply. As a result of these demands,

The process of International Adoption raises passionate emotions and arguments on different factors involving the process. Although organizations and groups are present in support of mainly the proponent side, some are swayed by policies involved. Bethany Christian Services believes in performing international adoptions as long as they follow the U.S policy involving court’s consent and the foreign countries policy. Whereas UNICEF will only perform international adoptions if the process is done through the Hague Convention.

Imagine being a child living in a third world country and only being fed two meals a day that barely provide the nutrients needed to help one grow, along with receiving very little affection. Some people argue that international adoption, provides a key role in improving a child 's life. Although others believe international adoption creates many complications and should not be an option. Therefore, many believe adopting a child from an outside country or culture can be quite rewarding for both the parents and the child; however, international adoption deals with many concerns as well as serious challenges.

Although some people argue that people should not be able to adopt international because of money. Despite this idea, That reason is absolutely not valid because people can always get a loan and if the adoption caretakers only care about money, then they don’t need to sell children. For example, article “Overseas Orphans.” claims that children who get adopted learn love. “Providing a loving and safe environment.” (Green,, n.p.) In other words love from a family is greater than a lot of things. Additionally, according to article “The Evangelical Orphan Boom.” claims that children who get adopted are cared for. Adoption also embodied a more holistic "pro-life" message -- caring for children outside the womb as well as within. (The Evangelical Orphan Boom,, n.p.) Basically adoption is spectacular for a caring home. Lastly, according to “Acting Out the Role of Single Mom.” claims that adoption is great for cultural. “Wanted to bring people into our lives and thought we needed a cultural medium to accomplish that.” ( Hyung-sook,, n.p.) What this means is parents want to bring children into their culture. Therefore, It is clear to see, It is very important to have a family because of love, care, and culture in a

The necessity of adoption in the world is astounding. Currently, there is an estimated 143 million orphans worldwide (Wingert, vol.151). As of 2007, there were 513,000 children living in foster care within the United States alone (Rousseau 21:14). International adoption in the United States was jumpstarted post World War II as a way of helping those children who were left homeless, after war had taken their parents. Although there are thousands of healthy children awaiting adoption in the United States, several American couples still turn to foreign adoption when seeking potential children. Americans often fail to realize the need for intervention within their own country and their duty to take care of domestic affairs before venturing to

But as a result, the child and the parent will both have a better foreseeable future (Claridge, 2014). There is a possibility of assisted housing available to help both of the parents get back on their feet and give them the support they need (Claridge, 2014). There would also be counselling available for the parents to help them cope, and figure out what they need to do to get their life back on track (American Adoptions, 2012). The opportunity for the parents to pursue their goals, whether travelling, schooling, or working, is greatly heightened (Benefits of Adoptions). Women are more likely to find employment one year after the baby is born (Benefits of Adoptions). More times than not, the adoptive parents will cover the cost of prenatal care and delivery. This is a major cost if they live in the United States, but even if they live in Canada it is still around $1200 dollars ($220-260 per night) (Isaac, 2015). As well as having all of their costs covered, they will also most likely have a superior choice in who their doctor is. Birth parents also get to specify their preferences for the adoptive parents, such as religion, location, dual income, single parent, etc. (Benefits of Adoptions). During a phone interview, it was found out that the birth parents are more likely to not have another child out of wedlock, and they are less likely to