International Adoption Research Paper

Even though adoption as a process has negative results for adopting children, some people still takes this act to be a good act where children who are deprived of parents still have a

When a couple or individual decides to adopt a child, they know they are going to take on the responsibility of taking care of someone else’s child. Due to the biological parent(s) who can’t take care of that child anymore, because of either drug abuse, alcohol abuse, abuse to the child or if the parent(s) had died and there is no other care for the child. So that’s why this gives other couples who cannot have kids, the opportunity to promise themselves to be a great parent to a child in need. Though there are some bad things about adoption as well. Like adopting a child from another country of another race, because once that child is adopted into an American family, he or she will be cut off from their culture and never know about their

1. Sub-Point 1: According to Kathleen Brumble and Charlene Kampfe, authors of the 2011 article “The History of adoption in the United States: A focus on the unique group of intercountry transracial special needs children” states that during the World War II era and all the devastations it brought made the American soldiers realize how many children were being left orphaned from the war. This soon started the adoption of European children.

Since the 1950s, the United States and other countries started a new way in the de-institutionalize the care of vulnerable children which is, close down orphanages in favour of substitute care and accelerated adoption. Besides, western countries started to give up their children without placing them for adoption, and thus, the need to operate large orphanages has decreased. These issues have resulted in a dramatic reduction of local orphans available for adoption, requiring many adoptive parents to orphanages in the Third World.

Adoption is an old process. Adoption is a process where parents who cannot provide for their kids can put them up for adoption to couples, or people would provide for the children. The concept of adoption was not legally recognized in the United States until the 1850 's. Back then there were no formal records of children being adopted. As the numbers of the informal adoption grew, they soon realized that they needed to get a legal process of started. In 1851, Massachusetts enacted the first adoption statute.Adoption History: Read About the History of Adoption." Insert Name of Site in Italics. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2016 Adoption in Massachusetts required judicial approval, consent of the child 's guardian, and a finding that the prospective adoptive family was of sufficient ability to raise the child. Adoption History: Read About the History of Adoption." Insert Name of Site in Italics. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Mar. 2016 . In the 1930 's. 40 's, and 50 's, social workers began sealing adoption records. The reason for the change in practice

Within the United States adoption has been evolved markedly, once it was used to “normalize “ a childless marriage (The Free Dictionary, n.d.) or prevent the shame of an adoptee at their “illegitimate” birth or an unwed mother social staning (Fair, 2008) now the primary focus rather is the child’s best interests, a better life. Adoption is a long-standing social behavior that involves a person other than the biological or legal parents of an individual assuming a parenting role in a permanent fashion in the eyes of the law (Health of children, n.d.; The Free Dictionary, n.d.). Through the declaration of legal paperwork a non-biological parent can adopt a child into their home. It must be acknowledged that there are less formal ways

In today's society, the idea of adoption is an open and welcome one. “When an adoptive family begins to explore the idea of adopting a child, it is easy for them to quickly become overwhelmed with information, questions and decisions” (American Adoptions, Inc). However, one of the biggest problem most adoptive parents could run into is whether they are wanting to adopt domestically or internationally. With the number of celebrities’ advertising the ease of adopting internationally and the publicizing conditions the orphans live in it makes American families want to adopt internationally. The number of children in the United States in foster care approved for adoption and the number of newborns born unwanted does not make the news so it domestic adoption is not as glamorous. Domestic adoption should be the first choice to help improve our country and give the children born in the United States a chance at a family.

104) and occurs through both international and domestic adoption. Transracial adoption began in the United States after the devastation of World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War. The controversy over transracial adoption increased in the 1970’s as the adoption of black children to white parents became more common. In 1972 The National Association of Black Social Workers (NABSW) publically announced their opposition to transracial adoption at the national conference of the North American Council on Adoptable Children (Morrison, 2004). The “National Association of Black Social Workers Position Statement on Trans-Racial Adoption”

Adopting children from other countries like Russia isn’t and will never be easy because of costs and sometimes the country itself doesn’t want to allow you to adopt an orphan. Russia banned America from adopting Russian children because of money. Russia did this because they didn’t

The fall of the Soviet Union gave childless American couples the opportunity to adopt needy, white children. Thousands upon thousands of children from Russia and Eastern Europe were adopted in New York during the 1990’s and 2000’s, and the vast majority of these adoptions produced genuinely happy families. The children were excited to have loving families and the adoptive parents were excited to have a child to love. However, some children had difficulty transitioning to life in the United States while others were victims of abuse. Almost every adoptive case I worked with had a happy ending. Every adoptive case except for one. I hesitate to say that the “child” in question was actually a child. Sometimes I think that I legitimately was dealing with pure evil in human form.

There is no place in the world that is without children who are in need of assistance, whether they be adoption or not. In China any child that is abandoned or lost is considered an orphan (Andrew 124). In Russia nearly every mentally or physically handicapped child is sent to “baby homes”, an orphanage for newborns to three year olds (Characteristics of Children). In Guatemala political, social, and economical forces have prevented many biological parents to care for their children (Yemm). Everywhere the predicament of children, who have no control over their own lives, has been brought to many figures of authority to plead their cause. The United States has a particularly strong bond with China, when it comes to adoption. This is because

Many people believe that international adoptions are a positive thing, and help provide a brighter future for the children they adopt. However, many countries have strict laws on international adoptions. The article Home Alone ventures to say that, "poor countries should fix their adoption systems so that, once domestic possibilities have been exhausted, foreigners can step in" (Home Alone). International adoptions can sometimes be tricky. Many countries have constantly changing laws on international adoption. "Adoption laws change from year to year, and from country to country. Changes in intercountry adoption bans and regulations in different countries may cause unexpected challenges for prospective international adoptive parents." (Child Welfare Information Gateway). Often times many international adoptions can become corrupt. Children are sometimes smuggled across borders. "If the children travel through an official border the adult who accompanies them needs to have paperwork, but in its absence a bit of money in an envelope does the trick"

International adoption takes children out of their countries, and this can lead to the risk of alienating children. Parents that adopt foreign children may be ill-equipped or uneducated in their adopted child’s culture and this can steer the loss of the child’s cultural identity. Culturally, we pass on our values and beliefs through our family structure; our heritage is part of our identity. People who are raised in another country could miss out on learning about their ethnic heritage. Medical writer Meg Brannagan claims internationally adopted children question where their place is in a

The United States has adopted indefinitely more children internationally than any other country. In 2008, there were 17,456 children adopted internationally by American parents (Statistics 1). Supposing that domestic adoption was prioritized over international adoption, those 17,456 children would have been adopted domestically. If these parents would have chose to adopt domestically, the United States foster system population would drastically drop over 17,000 because those children would have a loving home.

This has caused me to want to further research the issue. What are the social and emotional effects that adoption has on children?