International Industry Analysis Porter 's Five Forces

Porter’s Five Forces Industry based Model The five forces examines the dynamics within an industry. Understanding the competitive forces, and their underlying causes, reveals the roots of an industry’s current profitability while providing a framework for anticipating and influencing competition and profitability over time. Understanding the structure of its industry is also essential to effective strategic positioning.

@ Pages and References: p163 *a. T b. F 1. Competitive advantage is always revealed by a firm earning higher profitability than its rivals.

Lowes’ Porter's Five Forces Competitive Analysis As relevant to these competitive forces, the common and mutual goal of companies can be explained as better profitability with a greater market share against their rivals. Therefore, implementing Michael Porter’s Five Forces can help the companies determine the issues that may impact the company’s profitability in the long term.

Discussion Question 3.2: Porter’s model aims to enable managers not only to understand their industry environment but also to shape their firm’s strategy. The five competitive forces are threat of entry, power of suppliers, power of buyers, threat of substitutes, and rivalry among existing competitors. “As a rule of thumb, the stronger the five forces, the lower the industry’s profit potential- making the industry less attractive to competitors. The weaker the five forces, the greater the industry’s profit potential – making the industry more attractive” (Rothaermel, 2013, p. 65). It is recommended that managers position their company in an industry in such a way that relaxes the constraints of strong forces and

Porter has identified five (5) competitive forces that shape every industry and every market. The forces determine the intensity of competition and hence the profitability and attractiveness of an industry. Based on the information derived from this analysis, management can decide how to influence or to exploit particular characteristics of this industry.

“Strategy as Revolution” – a critical analysis Strategy formulation has been acknowledged as one of the most crucial factors of ensuring the long-term growth of the business. However, the manner in which strategy is formulated, and most importantly, the nature of the strategy chosen for the company determines its future position in the marketplace (Grant, 2005).

The lower the firm's ability to influence the market, the more competitive the industry is considered. In the limiting case where the degree of

Porter’s five forces analysis of the Personal Computer (PC) industry In his article “The five competitive forces that shape strategy“, Michael Porter (2008) updates and extends his “five forces” framework he first introduced in 1979 and which has influenced the academic and business research for decades. He reaffirms that “THREAT OF ENTRY”, “THE POWER OF SUPPLIERS”, “THE POWER OF BUYERS”, THE THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES”, and “RIVALRY AMONG EXISTING COMPETITORS” are the forces that shape every single industry, and a thorough understanding of such forces help analyze everything from the intensity of competition to the profitability and attractiveness of any industry. The framework has two dimensions; the vertical dimension that connects

I. Simple consistency between each activity and overall strategy. II. Occurs when activities are reinforcing. III. Optimization of effort. Fit and sustainability Competitive advantage grows out of the entire system of activities. The fit among activities substantially reduce cost or increases differentiation. Therefore strategic fit is essential not only to gain competitive advantages but also to the sustainability of that

This article has started revolutionary thinking about what are the different forces in addition to direct competitors that affect competitive strategy of an organization and how better understanding of industry structure and these forces, also known as " Porter 's Five Forces", derive organization 's strategy to achieve sustainability and higher profitability. Author has explained the other factors that contribute for industry structure like industry growth rate, technology and innovation, external factors, government & regulations and complementary products and services. Industry structure changes while responding to changes in competitive forces. Author also discussed the framework to perform industry analysis and avoid common pitfall while conducting analysis. In this review I will summarize five competitive forces explained by Micheal E. Porter and their implication on organization 's strategy. Further, I will discuss the relevancy of Porter 's five forces framework in current scenario.

Ansoff Matrix Strategic decisions are often based on by the company can use its existing competitive advantages in the process of promoting the value and capital growth (Lynch, 2009). However, sustained competitive advantage on how to perform these operations largely depends on the company. (Porter, 2008) The need for

Why is current industry profitability a poor of future profitability? Are the forces at work in industry a given from a firm’s point of view?

Competitive advantage is explained by Mahoney and Pandian (1992) as the function of industry analysis, organizational governance and the firm’s effects in the form of resource advantages and strategies. In order for a firm to be competitive it must adapt to the volatile business environment and through strategic management decisions establish a competitive advantage that will ultimately produce superior performance relative to its competitors (Akimova 2000).

A company that pursues and achieves strategic outcomes that boost its competitiveness and strength in the marketplace is in much better position to improve its future financial performance.

3. Intense rivalries among existing players Unlike Threat of new entrants, this factor mainly refers to competitions from existing enterprises in specific market. Porter mentioned, “Rivalry among existing competitors takes the familiar form of jockeying for position—using tactics like price competition, product introduction, and advertising slugfests.” It is also very important to notice that number of competitors and their capabilities directly influence on the intensity of rivalry (1979, PP. 137-145).