International Journal Of Social Welfare

The world is full of financial hardship, and American society possesses a great deal of controversy concerning lending. Unfortunately, short term lending, such as payday loans or title loans, creates a structural void within American society. According to Wikipedia, “Structural inequality is defined as a condition where one category of people are attributed an unequal status in relation to other categories of people” (wilipedia.com). When working class Americans apply for a payday, the unequal status between upper and middle class possess a bigger separation financially. The never-ending process of a short term financial fix becomes lifelong debt. Thus, middle class society becomes lower class society. Eventually, working class society will struggle to say above the poverty line. In addition to an imbalance in society classes, short term lending targets consumers who life paycheck to paycheck. In Rigging the Game by Michael Schwalbe, the author explains the reproduction of inequalities. Schwalbe discusses the different kinds of capitals human, social, and cultural (10). The three capitals unknowingly shape Americans social system. Many businesses capitalize on these capitals knowing no laws or regulation exists to stop them from capitalizing on individuals who no faults of their own were born into these unfair capitals. As a result, short term lenders possess the ability to have extremely high interest rates and outrageous fine print penalties because there is little

The main problem that most critics have with payday lenders is that many people recycle their loans and become trapped in cycles of debt. Some people use the loans irresponsibly or get loans from multiple lenders to buy things that they don't need or to enable unhealthy personal habits. These loans were never intended to be used in these ways, so some people get in trouble. The same holds true for all kinds of

Predatory lending has caused many conflicts in the American society. Victims who fall for predatory lending are

I am going to look at one of America's most resilient industries. The Predatory lending better known as Payday loans, and even sometimes pass as car lenders and mortgage lenders. One in twenty households have taken one out at some point. And is estimated to be a nine billion dollar industry. With payday loan outlets are all over the place. The ethical question comes into place. When you question whether if receiving one of these loans can be a benefit or drag the person signing into the loan deeper in debt. Im very interested on this subject because I believe that payday loans can be very useful and benefit the general public, if we put in place very specific laws and restrain what lenders can do making sure that there is

The United States lending industry’s main focus has become accentuating profits; therefore, they have made it impossible to live without a credit card in today’s economy and to avoid being taken advantage of by the banks. James Scurlock, director and producer of the film, “Maxed Out”, devotes his movie to informing the audience of the credit card system and its many flaws and gives examples of people who are majorly affected by the pressure the lenders apply. Throughout the movie, numerous statistics, and expert testimonies are presented, as well as comparisons and appeals to emotion. Through the use of this support Scurlock, is able to convey his overall message and propose numerous minor arguments that clarify

The purpose of this report is to inform you, the RSGs, about how the ethics of payday loans should be considered before moving on with your project. After you raised many concerns about whether or not ethics are an issue, Vice President Bette Davis decided to bring the CRC in to help out here. Davis wanted me to research the issue of the ethics of payday loans, and report back to her on with the information I found in order to help her decide how to resolve the issues between the RSGs. I first wrote a memo to Davis on how the CRC could help with doing the research and writing the report. I then wrote an annotated bibliography to Davis explaining the sources that I would be using and how they would be beneficial in the final report. I then presented to you about how this would help you resolve your issues. After you approved of what I had to say, I wrote an outline for the final report and submitted it to Davis. After completing all of my research, I have come to my conclusion and will inform you about it in this report. It will help you to come to a consensus on whether or not the ethics of payday loans are an issue.

In the article “Me, The Other Scott, And Payday Loans” by Scott Gilmore, the author is furious to find that most people are being drained out of money they don’t have. In my opinion, I agree with the author. I do not think it is right for Payday loans to be tricking people with little to no assets to pay for an amount they cannot pay back. According to the article, annual percentage rate is more than 540, while loan sharks charge double that. Loan sharks will gladly extend the loan for two more weeks, that way they can charge more interest rate. Stan Keyes, the president of the Canadian Payday association argues that “It is unfair to calculate the interest rate this way, since the loans are typically for two weeks. However he concedes that

Americans who need a short term loan to repair a car, fly quickly to a stick relative beside or catch up on child care payments even find themselves going to payday lenders ether online or trough one of the thousands of payday lending store fronts. (Wherry) using online is a way to pay or catch up with your due date of the payment that you owe. Having someone that can help you with a payment is a payday lender that can help you with a car payment also paying your rent or buying food or also buying a new sofa. Nationally borrowers spend roughly 8.7 billion per year on payday loans fees and what might start as a 500 lifetime can become a heavily burden. (Wherry) having a borrower that lend you a loan can be easy but it’s time to payback that is when it became complicated. Also having a fee is very complicated because they pressure you to pay back when you miss your due date. Annual interest rates for payday loans typically run between 391 and 351 percent a cording to the center for responsible lending and most people who use them end up paying more in fees over the course of the year than they originally received credit. (Wherry) annual rates are very high in percentage because of lending tem money and not paying back on the due date. Having these huge percentages are too much but when you borrow more than you need the more you ending up paying than the last

In the newspaper article, Me the Other Scott and Payday loans, Scott voices his opinion that payday outlet companies are on the edge of committing fraud. Payday Loan companies constantly feed off of those families living with low to middle income, who can barely afford continuous asset payments, leading to advance payday loans being the only possible resort. Payday loaners are just skimming legality lines when over charging interest rates to those who are in desperate need. Those who have no other choice eventually have to pay off the loan plus an additional cost to borrowing the loan in the first place, falling into a continuous cycle of debt. The government sets up those living in lower to mid income to be trapped in a never ending cycle

Debt is among the greatest challenges we face today, personally and as a country. More and more people are falling into this growing problem. Payday loan companies exploit this problem. Even though the loan amounts are relatively low, the

Guo does a good job at getting the audience to quickly take his side against payday lending by calling payday lenders “slippery” (Guo) and by stating that borrowers of payday loans typically use the loans as a “last resort” (Guo). Guo strengthens the audiences mistrust of payday lenders in the third paragraph giving brief details of a New York Times article in which the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau states that they will be proposing a “national set of rules to better regulate the industry” (Guo). specifically tightening the standards as well as restrictions on the number of times a loan can be rolled over. Guo’s evidence is from a credible source, The New York Times, however the credibility of Guo’s article comes into question when he could have googled the proposal and found it on the CFPB, or Consumer Finance Protection Bureau website, as it is the second link that pops up when searched. The proposal details as listed on the CFPB website goes into far more detail as to what is actually happening to borrowers and the actual regulations being considered than the Times article.

In the article “Me, The Other Scott, and Payday Loans” by Scott Gilmore describes the negative impacts payday loan companies can have on people who are not fortunate financially. Payday loan companies loan money to people with low income who are need of money, but the interest is 10 times more than it would be at a bank. I think this type of method of loaning money is not helpful because in return they ask for more. It is interesting to know that many are still following and using this type of banking when they are aware of the circumstances it has. It is however true that when people are need of money, they will use any way to solve their problems, as it is also stated in the article “These are respectable people with jobs facing an unexpected

There are over 1,400 payday loan outlets across Canada, it is easy to get a loan as did more than 2 million Canadians last year. The Canadian usury laws did ban more than 60 percent interest on loans “but in 2006, the federal Conservatives passed a law exempting payday lenders from criminal

Low interest loans from non traditional credit providers do exist, many of these are provided by non-for-profit groups. “Six hundred and fifty services nationwide offer no- or low- interest loans through Good Shepherd Microfinance.” (Stephen Long, 2015) Microfinance is a term for financial services targeted to people on low incomes, welfare or otherwise financially excluded and can not obtain traditional loans. They provide a service that is basically the same as pay day loans but without the high interest or short term time frames. The Australian government has a duty to protect vulnerable people from pay day lending, they need to finance programs of Microfinance like Good Shepard who “have reached more than 170,000 people previously excluded from mainstream banking access to loans and savings, with repayment rates consistently above 95%.” (Good Shepard, 2015) If the government can effectively implement government-run alternative credit providers, and step in and finance the already successful programs like Good Shepard, as well as making these alternative services known and accessible to consumers this will greatly reduce the harm pay day lending can cause. An education campaign to accompany the new alternate credit options would also help consumers better understand how pay day loans work and therefore make them aware of the risks they are taking when using the high interest services. However, most of the 1 million Australians using pay day loans are fully aware of how exploitative the industry is, but it is still the most rational or only option they have to obtain money when they are desperate. This is not only deeply concerning because it indicates how many people in our society are financially insecure, but is a clear sign that stricter regulation is not going to solve the problem unless consumers have alternate

Payday cash loans have been around for many years now, in both the united states and more recently in england. People get these crisis lending products through frustration when they have no place else to turn. Generally individuals have bad credit and find it hard to borrow from the normal high street banks and may also have exploited the goodwill of loved ones already.