International Law And International Legal Subjects

Amnesty international has done a lot of important things such as averting genocides and mass killing in many countries.

International organisations are great organisations that play an international role in matters, such as defence, human right and economics. The main organisations are:

Having aid brought into a country in need will help increase the health in the nation. Through internationalism you can provide humanitarianism and bring aid to less develpoed countires in times of suffer which will help them get the peace and secutity they need. Being on the supportive side of

was a respected organization. It played an important role in international negotiations, building diplomatic bridges and attempting to keep or broker peace during times of war and conflict.

Basically, Ratner discusses how we have two challenges: how to make universal rules legitimate amongst a community of diverse nations and how to make these rules effective in the absence of a governing authority. He then goes on to explain how there are four fundamental shifts in these kinds of issues. New Forms, New Players: Rules of international law used to reside in treaties or customary law, but as new domains from the environment to the internet become appropriate for international regulation, states become unwilling to embrace strict rules. Soft law enables states to adjust to the regulation of new areas without fearing punishment upon failure to comply. New participants are making demands

What happens when projects and interventions undertaken by international NGOs go wrong? Although my scholarly source understands most of these organizations do not seek to do harm, nonetheless harm occurs. This article by global development believes with a few legal and regulatory frameworks setting out how communities can hold NGOs to account, and with even less support fro communities to engage in such a process, there is a significant accountability deficit at the heart of international NGOs. Here we talk about accountability in regards to how NGOs answer to donors or to the national governments of countries in which they are operating. NGOs should account for the money they spend as contracted agents of donors. And they should, of course, be working within the parameters of national regulatory frameworks and laws (although the fact that NGOs themselves often sit on the committees that draw up such regulatory systems is troubling). When development interventions go wrong, or do not work the way they were intended, it is often no one's fault, due rather to events beyond any individual or organization's control. But people's lives are affected, sometimes (as when cholera sweeps through a refugee camp) with the most tragic of consequences (Global Development). Systems for recognizing the "rights" of beneficiaries and the obligations of agencies do exist. The Sphere Project, for example, sets out in great detail the minimum standards to be expected in, say, a refugee camp. But there are few legal frameworks capable of holding NGOs to account, or setting out in detail exactly when, where and how communities might be able to hold an organization accountable for an intervention that has gone disastrously wrong (Global Development). Unless NGOs and humanitarian agencies can be legally challenged and held to account, such principles and minimum standards do not do enough to establish real

They believe in the same mission that the UN does, which is to "save succeeding generations from the scourge of war" and provide for a more just world. (UN Watch, 2015) It's interesting, that I've heard a lot about shortcomings and issues that the UN has, but I still feel that the world is a better place with the UN in operation. That is why I think the UN watch, and the fact that they are "in Special Consultative Status" with some UN Councils makes the concept and efficacy of the United Nations even better.

Non-governmental organization or global civil society are utilized to portray a huge number of gatherings, shifting incredibly in structure, objective, financing, sway, and other key perspectives. The fundamental impact of these associations results from the utilization of ""delicate force"" as ""the capacity to get what you need through fascination instead of pressure or installments"". NGOs are especially powerful on issues identified with human rights and philanthropic guide. Their delicate force depends on the view of specialized aptitude, consolidated with ethical quality and regulating objectives, untainted by fanatic legislative issues or monetary goals, and anticipated through the media and different channels. Capable NGOs, for example, Human Rights

Another major one is Global Witness. It is an organization that actually helped bring conflict diamonds to the forefront. As said earlier, just because it is not readily found in the news doesn’t mean that it isn’t happening. Global Witness decided to expose this issue because of the problematic schemes of the blood diamond conflict. Global Witness is an organization that is all about increasing wide spread knowledge on issues that relate to things like human rights abuses and corruption which help to bring about a more hands-on approach to combat the injustices of the world.

Thirdly, we should remember China still is a developing country. There are many restrictions and considerations when forming NGO and implement works. Some laws hinder the development of NGOs like the funding. However, in the long-run, I think it is not a problem. As China is still finding a way to develop its country. They will amend its law for the interest of the nation. The most serious problem is the politics. Political pressure weaken the function of NGOs. I think it is hard to change the mindset of China government, but if the law amendments are well-developed, the NGOs development will be

A core of neoliberal policy has been promoting non-state actors, such as multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations and international development platforms. In the development sphere, state actors in the majority world have faced significant criticism from Western media. As a result, many international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) have become powerful in acting as the bridge between Western donors and the majority world. Thus, INGOs are integral to the neoliberal framework.

Over the years globalization has brought about transnational networks in international politics. What is novel is this networks ability of mobilizing non-state actors with information strategically to help create new issues and persuade over much powerful organizations and government. We in a generation that an issue be it women’s right, human rights, environmental issues becomes a worldwide subject through campaigns internationally. Non-state activist or NGOs normally carry out these campaigns through transnational network advocacy with goals to influence states and international organizations. Globalization has facilitated the growth of these networks and makes new forms of governance imperatives (Naim 2005). The government of states have over the years been faced by pressure of these non state actors to change their policy bringing a whole new definition to the word governance has seen in the 1993 international treaty to ban landmines in which the international NGOs played key roles in making points of environmental degradation and mistreatment of the poor. These were able to put

The other sub category of the non-state actors are the transnational actors. These, are of different nature. They include the Multi National Corporations(MNCs), which are organizations set up for profit making but which operate in more than three sovereign states. The economic power of these giant corporates give them a substantial say in most countries’ foreign policy making processes, especially in the Less Developed Countries(LDCs).The media, both local and international are also believed to be playing a crucial role in influencing foreign policy- making decisions. Also, there are the Non-Governmental Organizations(NGOs) and the International Non-Governmental Organizations(INGOs), usually behaving like a part of the civil society, forming the pressure groups. INGOs however, operate across borders and have individual membership. They include, for example the Amnesty International. Other transnational actors include the violent

Three theories on this matter: 1. The Naturalist – under this theory, there is a natural and universal principle of right and wrong, independent of any mutual intercource or compact, which is supposed to be discovered and recognized by every individual through the use of his reason and his conscience. 2. The Positivist – under this theory, the binding force of international law is derived from the agreement of sovereign states to be bound by it. It is not a law of subordination but of coordination. 3. The Eclectics or Groatians – this theory offers both the law of nature and the consent of states as the basis of international law. It contends that the system of international law is based on the “dictate of right

International Non-governmental Organizations can further be defined by their primary purpose. Some INGOs are operational, meaning that their primary purpose is to foster the community-based organizations within each country via different projects and operations. Some INGOs are advocacy-based, meaning that their primary purpose is to influence the policy-making of different countries’ governments regarding certain issues or promote the awareness of a certain issue. Many of the large INGOs have components of both operational projects and advocacy initiatives working together within individual countries.