International Policy Essay

For the longest time America has been known to ally with foreign countries, or be involved with few disputes in other countries. Yes, we need to trade and keep peace. However, what is better peace or to not be involved at all? Now, is a circumstance where we are stuck in Iraq and Afghan over issues such as terroristic activities but why did they start? America does have its own gas storage, not only that but there are areas where oil can be dug up from and bought from within borders and it could be sold amongst the few of us, instead we bought it from the middle east and when they fought amongst each other we got involved to keep the trade going, when it was none of our business. Yes World Peace is a great concept, But it doesn’t work, there will always be problems and trying to fix them only seems to make it worst, American forces should serve to defend and only attack after we’ve been attacked not used to help end civil wars or so on, it’s not our business, and most definitely not our problem but due to us stepping in, it becomes one.

Keeping Russia out is hard enough but soon a way to slow them from getting in was

Ukraine has been an independent state since 1991 and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the two nations continued to hold close ties. In the past two decades, there have been several significant events affecting the balance of power between the two nations. One of the events was in December 1994 when Ukraine agreed to give up its substantial nuclear arsenal at Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurance. The condition of this agreement being Russia and other signing countries would issue an assurance against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine. Just a few year later Russia also signed the Charter for European Security, the action “reaffirmed the inherent right

While there are two ways to look at a problem, I believe that, for this issue, the negative side is more practical and efficient. The United States should not impose economic sanctions on Russia because of three reasons. The first, in my opinion, why is there a need for the US to impose sanctions in the first place? Why is it their responsibility to look after Ukraine? While I understand that it is somewhat expected of the US to

Instead of becoming closer to Russia, the United States should make sure that Russia does not threaten their power, and keep them in constant military check.

Khrushchev handed over Crimea to Ukraine to mark the 300th anniversary of the merging of Ukraine. The United States should not put people at fault when they were not given a choice in which country they wanted to live in. This decision was made arbitrarily and done behind the scenes; at that time since they were still part of the USSR, nobody considered it a big deal. It was a personal gesture towards his favorite republic, the Ukrainian Republic. Khrushchev was the only man in power at the time, nobody dared to question him. Again, this shows that the Crimean people did not have any judgment towards this so it would be wrong of The United States to pull in troops. At that time, nobody had ever thought that the Iron Curtain could actually fall (Putin).Crimean people were assured to always be part of the union which included Russia. The Russian people in Crimea had a sense of security that they would always belong to a super power. Since this was breached with the fall of the Soviet Union, The Crimean people were stuck in another territory. Demonstrating that, Vladmir Putin said “Millions of people went to bed in one country and awoke in different ones, overnight becoming ethnic minorities in former Union republics, while the Russian nation became one of the biggest, if not the biggest ethnic group in the world to be divided by borders.” Crimea was

The end of the cold war obligated the United States once again to face the old problems which weren’t based on containment of communism. Like in the aftermath of World War 2 when America’s influence in the world was expanded, the end of the Cold War did much of the same. The problem’s the Soviet Union once had of controlling and influencing smaller countries under its thumb, now were inherited by the last super power standing, which at the time was the United States. Debate began to rise on what path America should take next on foreign policy, should the U.S commit itself to small problems or hold back its fire until a greater threat emerged?

Thus, “sanction programs with relatively limited objectives are generally more likely to succeed than those with major political ambitions” (SE, p.9). Meaning, these sanctions should operate in conjunction with other U.S. policies, rather than serve as the sole foundation in combating Russian attacks—both cyber and conventional—against the U.S. and its allies. Economic sanctions alone do not function as a forceful deterrent and therefore the U.S. must maintain strong alliances in NATO to repel Russian hostilities in Eastern Europe. Sec. 252 of HR 3364 states that, “a strong North Atlantic Treaty Organization is critical to maintaining peace and security in Europe and Eurasia” (p.8). The creation of NATO and the U.S.’s continued loyalty to other NATO members is an integral part of U.S. foreign policy dating back to the origins of the Cold War.

Not just holding the line if the Soviets lashed out, but really putting some pressure on the Kremlin for them to see the issues in their internal affairs and to improve their foreign policy. Just the US performing at its best has a large influence on the Soviets. The US succeeding politically and economically in their capitalist society pokes holes in the what the Soviets have been drilling into their communist societies for years. The US taking on some responsibility here could only be beneficial for both

The involvement by military means will worsen the situation like it has in the Middle East and the relationship between the United States and Russia. “US Ambassador Samantha Power said the US rejected Russia’s military annexation of Crimea. She warned that the US and its allies, who imposed sanctions on Russia two days ago, are prepared to take additional steps if Russian aggression continues.” (“Russia and the US exchange threats”). Clearly threatening to start a war against a large superpower like Russia is not the best way to ensure the nation’s security and will only instigate more problems like war which is definitely something that should not happen. Another foreign conflict that the United States was involved in without a valid reason was the Abadan Crisis in Iran. It was a crisis when the Iranian government under the leadership of Mohammad Mossadegh nationalized the assets of the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) and expelled all western oil companies. The United States immediately stepped in and the CIA and the British MI6 orchestrated a coup to restore the pro-american Mohammad Reza Pahlavi back to power and have Britain and other new western oil corporations including ones from the United States to have their business interests in Iran. According to an article by The Guardian, British foreign secretary Sir Anthony Eden regarded Mossadegh as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after he nationalised the British AIOC.

The US’s global influence and power place a broad range of intervention tools at its disposal. Even though tensions between Russia and Ukraine are lower than they were a couple of years ago, the impact of the US is visible. First, in the form of economic and political sanctions against Russia (Daiss, 2016). These penalties have proved costly to Russia and in some way have deterred further Russian aggression.

No nation is ever merely able to act at its people’s whim; a system of alliances and treaties has formed over the course of history, and breaking any of those agreements can mean anything from a small conflict to a large-scale war. One such

Summary: As of 25JUL17, the U.S. has said it is actively reviewing whether to send defensive weapons to help Ukrainian forces against Russian-backed rebels. Russia warned that anything that heightened tensions could jeopardize a solution to the conflict. This comes following a recent increase in violence over the last week where five Ukrainian soldiers were killed, and another eight were wounded in

It is hard to recall a time when there was as much uncertainty about America’s foreign policy strategy as the situation we confront now. Our foreign relations are frayed or

The ways by which we can achieve these ends are described in the NSS and NMS. First, multilateral sanctions in conjunction with allied nations will be used to levy “costs and deter future aggression” . Further, the United States has recommitted to honoring our security commitments with allies within the Russian sphere of influence with the intent of serving as a deterrent to Russian aggression via improved defensive capabilities (for countries such as