International Standard On Auditing Standards

The field of accounting is constantly evolving. This is true not only for the theory of accounting itself but also the entities that govern its theory and practice. Presently, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are faced with some of the biggest challenges to date. To understand the significance of these two boards, it is necessary to understand their histories, relations between the boards, and the standards that they set. Also how the knowledge of these boards and the field they lead, gained through the masters of science in accountancy

The clarity project was designed to improve the auditing standards, to make them easier to read, understand and apply. It also converged the standards with the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). The Auditing Standards Board started the project in 2004 after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was implemented. There was a need for clear standards for auditors after the events that brought the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Also the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board began working on clarifying the international auditing standards in 2003 and they went into effect in 2009. The purpose of the Clarity Project was to help CPA’s understanding of generally accepted auditing standards and complying with them and converged them with the international auditing standards.

‘There has been a worldwide demand from regulators, investors, businesses, and auditing firms for a single set of high-quality, globally-accepted accounting standards. The American Institute of CPA’s (AICPA) believes U.S. adoption of a single set of high-quality, globally accepted accounting standards will benefit U.S. financial markets and public companies by enabling preparation of transparent and comparable financial reports throughout the world” (aicpa.org).

JPMorgan Chase Bank is a publicly traded company and uses an external-independent auditing firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, to provide an annual audit. JPMorgan

The convergence of two accounting systems, the US GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards, is not a new concept. For many years, the primordial idea of convergence started in the late 1950’s in response to post World War II economic integration and related increases in cross-border capital flows. Initially, the term used was “Harmonization until the early 1990’s the politically correct term is “Convergence”.

As the complexity of our financial economy develops it is important that our accounting standards progress in accordance. Accounting is very important to the development of the global and local economies. Accounting is basically the gathering, summarizing and presenting of financial information of an entity to interested internal, external and possible investors. This information should be presented in a non-bias way so that other people are able understand.

There are five key topics for comparison between ISA and U.S. Auditing Standards. The U.S. Auditing Standards is broken up between two groups: Auditing Standards Boards (ASB) and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). ASB is the authoritative group for non-public companies. PCAOB is the authoritative group for public companies. PCAOB was formed from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) (Lindberg & Seifert, 2011). The five key topics to compare ISA and US GAAS are: documentation of audit procedures, going concern considerations, internal control over financial reporting, risk assessment, and use of another auditor. Let’s discuss each of them below.

The International Accounting Standards Board and the IFRS were created in 2001, which replaced the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) (IFRS ,2016). The monitoring board was created in 2009 (IFRS ,2016). ISAB and IFRS work to bring transparency, accountability and efficicenny to financial markets around the world (IFRS , 2016). The accounting standards are set as requirements to be allowed by organizations when the financial statements are prepared (IFRS, 2016). Standards are set by the IASB are the IFRS Standards (IFRS, 2016).

In 2001, The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was established to develop the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS). ). The first IFRS was issued in 2003 and European Union (EU) members committed for requesting all listing company to apply the IFRS in their jurisdictions and will effective on year 2005 (Brussels, 2000).

This essay will critically evaluate the adoption of International Accounting Standards by UK companies. IAS (International Accounting Standards) created by IASC (International accounting standards committee) are a set of standards stating how particular types of transactions and other events should be reflected in financial statements. Since 2001 the IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) succeeded the IASC to create the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) which are “a single set of accounting standards, developed and maintained by the International Accounting Standards Board (the Board) with the intention of those standards being capable of being applied on a globally consistent basis—by developed,

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), represent the norms that were introduced by IASB. Being an independent organization that was not operational to earn profits, IASB, also known as, International Accounting Standards Board, incepted IFRS to facilitate public companies around the globe. IFRS presented a framework that served as a guide for these corporations directing them on preparation and disclosure of the financial statements. The International Financial Reporting Standards offered general guidance to the seekers concerning the financial statements. The standards never strived to set industry specific reporting principles or regulations.

Regulation is defined as a set of rules that is designed to control and govern conduct by authority (Deegan 2009, p.59). On the basis of this definition, Deegan (2009, p.59) has defined regulations relating to financial accounting as rules that are developed by independent authoritative body to govern the preparation of financial statements which are accounting standards. Since decades ago, there have been arguments for and against the existence of accounting regulations. With a stance of pro-regulation, this essay is going to examine the reasons that financial accounting and reporting should be regulated and the merits of accounting regulations.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) began operations in 2001. It is an organization committed to developing, in the public interest, a single set of high quality, global accounting standards that require transparent and comparable information in general purpose financial statements. The IASB has developed procedures that bring transparency, predictability, and consistency (IASCF Press Release, December 2, 2007).

“International Standards on Auditing (ISA’s) have basic rules & needful procedures together with related instructions in the form of guiding and other material. It is bound to developing, in the public interest, a single set of merit, global accounting standards that require clear & equivalent information in

It is better for accounting profession having agreed accounting standards as a basis for preparing financial statements. This is