Essay on Internet Free Speech Issues and Implications

A person up to date in today's society must acknowledge the importance and the parcticality of the internet. Just as in other areas of society, personal freedoms are stretched to the very limit on this modern invention, raising isuues in regards to what type of information the internet should be allowed to broadcast. Since its inception, the internet has spawned overnight millionaires, served as the new information medium, and even played host to some heinous crimes. The topic of greatest concern though, is in how the people legislate the division between what is obscence and what is allowable. The way that these issues are dealt with will shape the very form in which the internet and other

Government officials may want to regulate the internet but no matter how hard they try it will be nearly impossible to complete because of how rapid the internet it growing. So many different sites are created everyday there is no way of keeping up with how many there are or how big the internet actually is. Not only is the internet an ever changing

In order to find truth to anything, one must make multiple suggestions, ask many questions, and sometimes ponder the unspeakable. Without doing so, there would be no process of elimination; therefore, truth would be virtually unattainable. Now, in our attempts to either find truth, express our beliefs and opinions, or generally use the rights we are given constitutionally, we are often being criticized and even reprimanded. Our freedom to voice our opinion(s) is being challenged, as critics of free speech are taking offense to what seems like anything and everything merely controversial and arguably prejudice. As people continue to strive for a nation free of prejudice and discrimination, where everyone is equal, safe and

The Internet provides a gateway for an individual to speak freely and anonymously without being targeted to what he or she said. With this said, one of the biggest issues concerning the Internet today is freedom of speech. The issue of free speech on the Internet has been a topic of discussion around the world within the past years. It is a unique communication medium and is powerful than the traditional media[2]. Because the Internet can not be compared equally to other mediums

In docket number 14-28, FCC 15-24, the Federal Communication Commission released a document concerning the protection and promotion of open internet. The internet is essential for speech, our economy, business and innovation, making this a very important issue to examine. In a globalized world, the internet keeps us in contact and update with persons and events all around the world. This document deals with the Open Internet Order, which, “prohibits blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization” of the internet (FCC 3). These objectives are aimed at keeping the internet open for users, and providing a functioning medium for business and communication alike. After the Federal Communication Commission adopted these goals of maintaining

If there is anything we know for sure, it is that the internet will never be the perfect virtual paradise we want it to be. Those who advocate regulating speech on the internet are trying to create an online utopia: a place where all expression is positive and building. But we are humans, and when we desire to

The Internet has incurred a tremendous amount of growth and opportunity for the country as well as the world; elevating communication, information, and commerce to a new level. With all this unprecedented innovation, the Internet has also brought controversy that challenges the very foundation of rights that countries like the United States were founded on. With countless websites containing unregulated and objectively offensive content, and the public having an ease of access to this content will result in severe damages to the development of the youth if no censorship is put in place for them to view this content. Additionally, markets are being exploited by piracy which has resulted in billions of dollars being lost by the domestic economy

Fisher, W. (2001, June 14). Freedom of Expression on the Internet. Retrieved July 14, 2015, from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ilaw/Speech/

America is founded on the rights to life, liberty, and property and as a part of our liberty (as well as the first amendment) we are promised the freedom of speech. However, as Ben Shapiro stated in his article, free speech has decreased throughout the years and has since become desolate in American society. The government has done everything in their power to reduce the amount of freedom for American citizens, therefore we truly don't have the ability to openly criticize any decisions made by any governmental branch. On the other hand, David Shariatmadari brings up the point that anybody can practice their freedom of speech through social media or books. While this is true, posts do get flagged and removed if they do not follow the terms and

In a country that has a long history of upholding the freedom of speech and advanced technologies, people in the United States have enjoyed the internet to the largest scale for many decades. The internet made it possible to spread information worldwide, and thus it would not be strange for most of the people to hear the phrase “Internet Censorship”. Many people are familiar with this phrase, and are aware that this kind of censorship is in almost every country. However, to what extent, and for what purpose, Internet censorship is used, is still a general obscurity with the public. In this paper, I would like to explore how this technology is used and its impact on the three strictest countries regarding freedom of Internet access to information:

Many Americans today rely on the Internet for two main reasons: information and connectivity. Some may consider it as the biggest library available because of the endless information it can provide. It further enhanced people’s knowledge of what’s going on all around the globe and has been proved to be a very powerful tool that is available for anyone to use. Communication improved not just here in the United States of America, but also in other countries thanks to social media. Despite of all this, there is still an evident problem for American citizens when it comes to Internet Regulation. There’s an apparent government intervention when it comes to regulating the Internet. Under net neutrality, companies shouldn’t restrict what and how

With the advent of the World Wide Web in 1989, people across the world gained access to an ever-increasing well of information. Access to this information could be at risk, however, with increasing amounts of censorship arising in nations across the world. Internet censorship is when groups attempt to prevent users from accessing certain information that they decided is unnecessary or wrong to view. The censorship users are subject to is important to acknowledge as it can affect access to content and the amount of content created, as well as potentially preventing discussion, even for non-controversial topics. There are several ways you could approach the topic of internet censorship, all of which have differing degrees of success in their methods of attack and lasting effects on the internet ecosystem. The best solution is to take more of a laissez-faire approach and scale back the amount of censorship currently present, allowing users to govern themselves, instead of trying to enforce rules put in place by a governing entity or private company, or trying to reach a middle ground on what should or should not be censored.

The First Amendment of the Constitution distinguishes Americans from other citizens in the world. The right to free speech, press, and religion is at the core of the Americanvalue system. As a result, when thesefreedoms are challenged people tend to react strongly. However, at times government officials and theirconstituents would argue that censorship, or other violations of Constitutionalrights, are legitimate. With the advent of new technologies, politicians createnew policies to gain control over these technologies. This attempt to exertcontrol appears in the legislation geared towards the Internet. Currently free speech thrives on theInternet. A very large variety ofopinions are expressed on

Now any website or web service also had to monitor and self-sensor any information from their services that might contain material that might be harmful to the state. In the same year “The Measures for Managing Internet Information Services” outlined what and how hosts should monitor Internet traffic. This document explicitly stated which forms of speech are not expectable. Any speech or information, harmful to the state, containing differing views on religion, or those that may cause disorder or lead to national disunity have been stated.

The riveting court case of Texas v Johnson challenges the limits of the First Amendment, particularly freedom of speech. The First Amendment states that, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Texas vs Johnson revolves around the burning of the American flag, and deciding whether that constitutes as freedom of speech, or not. This essay will cover the background of the court case, followed by an explanation of why court cases such as these are important issues to examine. Next, two sides, one against the