Internet Neutrality

The internet is a resource with ever expanding content and applications for everyone to use however, net neutrality rules on the free use of internet remains a debated topic. The “Point/Counterpoint: Network Neutrality Nuances” presents Barbara van Schewick’s supportive argument on the applications of net neutrality rules, and the consequences of failing to do so. Schewick’s engaging justifications are well researched with arguments containing significant amounts of examples, strong and simplistic diction to reach her audience, and clean and smooth transitions to move between ideas.

It is often regarded as the notion that, the broadband service provider should charge customers only for Internet access without any form of discrimination or favoritism on content viewed by end-users from their respective content providers. The concept of “Net Neutrality” is intended to regulate price and promote competition. Simply put, it is a premised on the principle that all Internet traffic must be treated equally without bias. “Opponents of the Net neutrality on the other hand, see bandwidth as a private resource, one that is supplied most efficiently if exclusive owners take responsibility for managing and conserving it, and are able to optimize its value by exerting control over the content and application it conveys” (Yoo,

Furthermore, without net neutrality, “Comcast has the potential to slow up or speed down certain internet content, it could slow down ABC content while boosting the speed of NBC content” (“The Case for Net Neutrality”). In the absence of net neutrality, big companies can control the internet speeds based on bias. Seeing as companies such as Comcast have the ability to speed up or slow down specific content without net neutrality, the general public is not receiving equal access to all content. Under net neutrality, major companies controlling Internet speeds would be forbidden, ensuring the equal access the general public currently receives would be protected. To add on, the debate on net neutrality will determine if the general public will be victims to ISPs unfair and dangerous regulations. “The [situation] outcomes appear to give ISPs dangerous and unfair control over the internet, especially considering the role of the internet in [the general public’s] daily lives” (“The Case for Net Neutrality”). Lacking net neutrality, ISPs can control the Internet in unfair ways, greatly impacting the general public’s

As previously stated, net neutrality is a complex subject and it has many layers. One issue of major of concern is that of “fast lanes” and the establishment of net neutrality would prevent ISPs from forming these types of connections. Simplified, a fast lane is line of service that provides faster upload and download speeds. A fast lane would allow ISPs to charge companies such as Netflix, Skype, PlayStation Plus, and other streaming services for faster connections that would allow consumers to access the services easier and faster. Proponents of net neutrality worry that the extra expenses for fast lanes could become a formidable challenge for startups and small business owners. Large corporations typically

Most Americans today don’t even know what net neutrality is, let alone how it so greatly affects their life. Whenever you use the internet you are benefiting from net neutrality. Net neutrality is what allows us to visit any website at the maximum speed anytime with no slowdowns or interference by ISPs. This is one of the core ideas that internet was founded on. ISPs (Internet Service Providers) are the companies that are trying to restrict and monopolize the internet. The removal of net neutrality would allow ISPs greater control over what you can do, create and view on the internet. If ISPs have this ability, they could greatly influence people’s quality of life. The right to net neutrality is going to be addressed next year by the

One of the greatest factors threatening the Internet today is the attempt to dismantle net neutrality. Net neutrality is the idea of an open Internet, one on which people can freely communicate online; some Internet service providers, however, want the right to block or discriminate against any applications or content from which said companies gain no profit. If net neutrality is destroyed, then private corporations have free reign in throttling the sharing of information and of services for their consumers. This would cause private corporations to hold all the business, and we would all become consumers, simply taking what the corporations provide. Not only would this be an assault on the consumer’s right to choose, but this would completely

Network Neutrality as defined by a University of California student is, “a network design paradigm that argues for broadband network providers to be completely detached from what information is sent over their networks.”(Lin, 1) Put into layman terms, it is the act of ISPs to not provide a

The problem is without net neutrality, the (Internet Service Provider) ISP such as BT or comcast could influence what we see and how quickly we see it. In order to watch youtube, browse facebook or read the news, we need an ISP to connect us to that content. Net neutrality demands that ISPs should treat all web traffic the same. If netflix makes an arrangement with an ISP could block netflix's competitors from reaching customers. Many ISPs have started their own streaming services. They could favour their own content and block competitors out completely. ISP argue that, if there was less regulation and they were able to charge a premium for faster service, they could reinvest the money in better infrastructure. Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) vote to lift restrictions that require internet service providers to treat all legal internet traffic equally in terms of

By taking the open carrier (rules to keep the internet equal and safe for companies) and removing them, the only way for small brand companies to make a living to to pay for decent connection. This will in turn create a lot of unfair competition since other companies will pay extra just to shut off other companies from a certain internet provider denying access to the consumer. The internet, if net neutrality isn't completely repealed by Congress, will give all the power to big name companies from quality of videos, censored sites, and high speed/poor speed connections. They will be given the ability to discriminate sites, platforms, creators etc. Prices will inevitably go up as a result of business needing to pay extra for a slot on the internet. We will be reverting to the times past 2015 when big brands would block certain usages from the public for their own personal gain. As seen in the article, Net Neutrality Violations: A

The article “Net neutrality is here. What it means for you” briefly describes what net neutrality is and the changes net neutrality has offered to many individuals. Net neutrality also known as network neutrality, means that many individuals are not restricted to having slower internet speeds or unauthorized access to certain applications, websites, or services meaning that the internet is open. The article describes the changes that net neutrality has brought. However, for the most part not a lot changed, many services that had been blocked before by large telephone and cable providers (ISPs) will now allow individuals to regain or gain access to blocked applications and services. Large internet services and websites like AOL, Facebook, Netflix,

Say you order something from Amazon which is a large company; they process all deliveries through an internet service provider, along with 3 other companies. Now net neutrality works by evenly distributing all the services at the same rate making it a fair yet competitive environment. If net neutrality was not in place then the bigger companies, which in this instance would be Amazon, could put more money into the system creating faster service to the consumers and knocking out the other competitors. Net neutrality shows that each business in not competing with one another, big or small, and has the same chance of growing and plunging forward and becoming successful. Net neutrality creates opportunities for people and is favored by many

Tim Berners-Lee said “Freedom of connection with any application to any party is the fundamental social basis of the internet. And now, is the basis of the society built on the internet.” Net Neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers shouldn’t block or deny access to certain websites or content but should allow access to all content by everyone. The major controversy with net neutrality is that FCC is putting regulations on internet service providers. The FCC is proposing to protect net neutrality by enforcing new rules on internet service providers under Title II of the communications act. The FCC would be given the power to prevent these providers from banning any legal service or website. To outlaw fees for faster service, to ban the impairing or degrading of internet traffic. Those who support net neutrality are major tech companies including Google, Facebook, Netflix, Mozilla, Etsy and Reddit. They argue that without strong regulation, cable companies could “pick the winners” online, providing better service for their own

All data on the Internet is the same, where there is no discrimination or charging differences based on the user, website, device, equipment, content, application, etc. Basically, the Internet treats all content equally no matter how it is delivered or where it comes from. A good example is how you access Amazon’s website should be no different than a small local business website or downloading a video. The debatable issue is where ISPs would create a concept of “fast lane” access, where big companies would pay to ensure they remain competitive with faster transmission speeds. Within an ISP network, companies like Amazon and Walmart may compete to access a ISPs fast lane, ultimately leaving one to conduct business on the slow lane. ISPs view the Internet as a luxury because big companies have deeper pockets to stay in the “fast lane” which in turn will generate more revenue for ISPs. The loss of net neutrality means small business and certain websites may no longer

In just the past few decades, the internet has grown from a new technology, into a staple resource for billions. When anything grows from a service to a necessity, important decisions have to be made about regulating and limiting the control any given party has over them or risk abuse of power. When it comes to the internet, net neutrality is at the forefront of these regulations. Net neutrality, is the idea that access to the internet should be unrestricted and free; According to Emily Hong and Sarah Morris “In the simplest of terms: the FCC rules [on net neutrality] mean no fast and slow lanes on the internet, no blocking of content, and no provider throttling your streaming

The concept of network neutrality (more commonly referred to as net neutrality) has been a fixture of debates over United States telecommunications policy throughout the first decade of the twenty-first century. Based upon the principle that internet access should not be altered or restricted by the Internet Service Provider (ISP) one chooses to use, it has come to represent the hopes of those who believe that the internet still has the potential to radically transform the way in which we interact with both people and information, in the face of the commercial interests of ISPs, who argue that in order to sustain a competitive marketplace for internet provision, they must be allowed to differentiate their services. Whilst this debate has