Internet Neutrality (CIRA)

ISPs could manipulate speeds and throttle (Throttling is a process of slowing down content or speeding up others) to their liking and make deals with companies to make their services faster than others. Without net neutrality a packet of data from youtube for example could be treated different from a packet of data from netflix. this means that companies with priority access or a “fast lane” would stream faster. ISPs could also block services or websites not even making them available to the user. This would be something like cable is now were the more you pay the more you get. If an ISP did not like a service or website they could just block it. An open Internet is essential to the American economy, and increasingly to our very way of life. Net neutrality has been built into Internet since it was creation we can not take the principle for

The issue of net neutrality is an extremely important issue because any one person who uses the internet can be affected by whether or not the net is neutral or not. Net neutrality is the internet’s guiding principle back from when it was created. Net neutrality is the concept that on the internet everything and everyone is equal. Broadband needs to be classified under the rules on Title II of the Communications Act, so that everyone can have a free platform. What this means is that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) cannot charge a website, such as a streaming site, more to have faster service. ISPs cannot also intentional slow a website's connection nor can they filter out entire websites because they want to. The reason this is very controversial

Your internet experience is in jeopardy and it’s up to you to prevent it. Net Neutrality is the principle that regulates internet service providers like Verizon, AT&T, and Comcast from charging consumers a higher price for faster connection to their content. Net neutrality allows access to the internet on to all consumers equally. When it comes to the internet and browsing, the speed at which your information loads is important. Viewing a video on Instagram, Facebook or YouTube, which takes 5 minutes to load can be frustrating to the viewer. However, more consumers would connect to a server where they may view a video that only takes 5 seconds to load.

net neutrality rules restrict how companies may price and package computer network services. The rules prohibit bargains or bundles that are seen to discriminate among applications. Regulators see danger lurking in your broadband ISP, the cable TV system putting you online via a cable modem, or the telephone carrier connecting you via a digital subscriber line (DSL) or fiber to the home (FTTH) networks. The operator, left to its own devices, is feared to maximise its profits not just by taking your monthly subscription fee but by then skimming an unearned surcharge.

In just the past few decades, the internet has grown from a new technology, into a staple resource for billions. When anything grows from a service to a necessity, important decisions have to be made about regulating and limiting the control any given party has over them or risk abuse of power. When it comes to the internet, net neutrality is at the forefront of these regulations. Net neutrality, is the idea that access to the internet should be unrestricted and free; According to Emily Hong and Sarah Morris “In the simplest of terms: the FCC rules [on net neutrality] mean no fast and slow lanes on the internet, no blocking of content, and no provider throttling your streaming

But without Net Neutrality, big internet companies can come in and say, “Okay, so you’ve paid x amount of dollars for your internet. But, oh, if you want to get on Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, or Facebook,

ISPs can no longer bully companies into paying fees for reliably displaying their website, throttle connections, block webpages, or prioritize information. They’re under strict rules as they are now classified as a common carrier so if they attempt anything that’s remotely illegal, there will be consequences. According to an article in The Washington Post titled “Here are the first lawsuits to challenge the FCC’s net neutrality rules” written by Brian Fung. “USTelecom — a group that includes some of the nation's largest Internet providers — filed suit in Washington” (Fung). They filed the suit so soon after the laws were put into place that the FCC called it premature and called for a dismissal (Fung). "These companies have threatened all along to sue over the FCC's decision, even though that decision is supported by millions of people”

According to “Net Neutrality” from Stanford.edu, without Net Neutrality, the internet could become like cable TV in that “The Internet would be controlled by a few very large companies who would be free to decide how much service should cost and what content users have access to”4 Certain websites could be restricted or offered for extra, transforming the internet from a free, unrestricted place into a space controlled and operated by large companies. In addition, it is pointed out that once humans become accustomed to improvement, it becomes difficult to go back to something worse. If ISPs created “fast lanes” and “slow lanes,” customers would find the “slow lanes” unbearable after using the superior version.1 Author Nicholas Carr has done extensive research proving this phenomenon.1 This would disadvantage smaller websites that cannot afford to pay ISPs a fee to be

In an article by The White House, “Simply put: no service should be stuck in a ‘slow lane’ because it does not pay a fee” (The White House). In simpler terms, without network neutrality, good services couldn’t deliver quick service to their customers, just because network providers won’t let them without paying a fee. An article by Rey Lin says “This principle implies that an information network such as the internet is most efficient and useful when it is less focused on a particular audience and instead attentive to multiple users” . This explains that all types of services and media should be embraced on the internet, and not just those that network owners agree with, or are paid to agree with. “we cannot allow Internet service providers (ISP’s) to restrict best access or to pick winners and losers in the online marketplace for services and ideas” (The White House). I believe this quote sums it up perfectly, allowing ISP’s to decide which services are successful and not successful is placing power in their hands that should be in the hands of the consumers using the services. Allowing ISP’s to decide which services are successful on the internet would ultimately hurt the consumer by not allowing them to decide which services they want to

Net Neutrality otherwise known as internet neutrality is the principle by which basic internet protocols should not be discriminatory and content providers should be equally treated by internet operators. It says your internet service providers should not be allowed to block or degrade access to certain websites or services, nor should it be allowed to set aside a “fast lane” that allows content favored by the internet service provider to load more quickly than the rest. Regardless of the amount of traffic transpiring, companies such as Verizon, AT&T and Comcast should treat all traffic in the same manner.

The debate of Net Neutrality is much about keeping the Internet where it is now or how much to allow ISPs, specifically broadband providers, to manage their specific networks. However, this debate is more political than technical, therefore the issue is the Internet has grown so large and to the point that the government is now involved in setting regulations. ISPs, such as, Verizon, Comcast and others have very little interest in just installing the cable into homes, however, the interest is in what data you consume, and from whom and how much, merely there is a lot of money at stake.

The internet is the most important platform for ideas and thoughts to grow and spread, making it substantial. It’s important to keep it free and open for anyone without having to worry about being prioritized or shut out completely. The FCC has overstepped and has made it seem like safety is their main objective with the new ruling, but in reality its for control and sides with big businesses over the rest of society. The government should not interfere with the internet anymore then they are now, Anything more would give them too much control. Internet being regulated like a utility is bad business, Europeans who use internet being regulated is on average 30% slower than our current speeds. Not only will speeds be negatively affected but

People are more dependent on the internet then they ever were (Conda 2). Internet service provides may start having exclusive deals for certain service like Netflix or YouTube. Internet companies are making the Internet very unfair, and since certain areas only have one or two internet providers they can control whatever they want without people leaving (Gattuso 3). Another reason for not enforcing net neutrality regulation is it would take away all the filters that the broadband providers gave to the families; these filters block “child pornography, obscenity, and other dangerous content on the Web” (Conda 3). Another company came in to play in the net neutrality fight, Google Fiber. Google Fiber supposed to be really fast internet and to compete with the other companies and the FCC (Gattuso

The Internet came to be because of the user. Without the user, there is no World Wide Web. It is a set of links and words all created by a group of users, a forum or a community (Weinberger 96). The concept of net neutrality is

The reality though is that this change is not for the better. The whole idea with the internet changing is frightening to most, but a lot of people don’t realize what exactly is happening to Net Neutrality.With the internet being so widely popular and important in this day and age, information and exploration on Net Neutrality is an essential topic to be informed on. (Brightlinks)