Internet Plagiarism Is Becoming The Root Of Unethical Behavior Among Students Essay

Plagiarism is an increasing large issue on college campuses, a habit to most of the student. According to the article ‘’The Plagiarism Plague’’, the findings on the survey made to 50,000 students on more than 60 campuses was that 70 percent of the students admitted that they cheated. Half of the students surveyed admitted that one or more times made serious cheating on writing assignments, with 77 percent of the students surveyed said that cheating was not a serious issue.

Almost every student has been there: staring at his/her computer trying to get an assignment done when they have twenty other obligations swinging over his/her head. Students are trying to find the fastest and easiest way to get the assignment completed. Many students will plagiarize intentionally or unintentionally at some point of their educational career. Plagiarism is the act of taking someone else’s work or ideas then calling that work their own. There is no acknowledgement being given to the original author. In Trip Gabriel’s “Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age,” the internet has created new challenges for students being able to give credit to ideas and information. Often, Students do not understand that information on

Plagiarism is an ongoing problem from high school to college and beyond. If you ask ten high school students about plagiarism, one out of every three students will have admitted to using plagiarism off the internet for an assignment. (Donald McCabe, Rutgers university) A survey conducted by Donald McCabe at Rutger’s University showed that out of 24,000 students at 70 different high schools, fifty-eight percent admitted to plagiarism. In another study he conducted with college students the numbers had increased greatly. Over the course of three years out of 63,700 students thirty-six percent admitted to plagiarizing from the Internet. Seven percent of those students admitted to copying word for word from a written source.(Donald McCabe 2002-2005 plagiarism.org) This survey he conducted just shows how plagiarism gets worse as students progress with their education if not not taught early.

plagiarism causes and effects the education in today’s world. It also deals with how to prevent and detect plagiarism.

Not making a good use of the internet and deciding to plagiarize can result in a failing grade. Students have been cheating all the way from High School without getting caught, and consequently they haven’t been lectured on plagiarism. Usually, teachers do not take the time to talk to their students about plagiarism. “many students claim not to have been confronted with the issue by parents or previous teachers except when personally caught plagiarizing” ( Petress). This lack of knowledge about plagiarism incites students to keep cheating. The only difference is that in college teachers have more advanced ways to grade papers. Technology has advanced. “...the same technology that makes it so easy for students to cheat is now aiding teachers in catching them” ( Hastings). College teachers are more strict regarding plagiarism than high school teachers; they can turn a plagiarized work into a zero. Students need to understand how useless it is to cheat. Everything is better than a zero, so students will get more benefit if they turn in a paper that

In “Academic Integrity and Student Plagiarism: a Question of Education, Not Ethics,” Susan Blum confronts the challenges associated with plagiarism, citation, and the education system. Initially, the author establishes plagiarism as a major problem on college campuses. Because previous approaches for dealing with plagiarism have been unsuccessful, many professors have turned to electronic software like Turnitin to identify student plagiarism (Blum 1). This means colleges and professors are desperate to find a solution to the increasing problem of plagiarism. Additionally, we see students are in need of a deeper understanding and education on the concept of plagiarism. Blum states, “Students must be persuaded of the value of citation - which

Most academic concerns are based on student morals. Plagiarism detecting tools are a better source related to website or internet plagiarism such as a student’s awareness of peer behavior. According to McCabe et al. Perception of peer behavior is an important factor in academic integrity McCabe and Trevino (1993, 1996, and 1997). In other words, if students recognize that most of their peers are going online to plagiarize, they may be more obliged to plagiarize themselves.

Educators have long been concerned with the problem of detecting plagiarism. Despite the severe sanctions imposed when it is discovered, some students persist in using the words and ideas of other writers without attribution. Ironically, the very seriousness of the offense and the penalties imposed may contribute to the relative impunity of the offenders.

Universities have measures to prevent and catch students who have plagiarised their essays, however on a rare occasions plagiarism is unfortunately undetected. In such a circumstances, the student receives a high mark and passes the subject without gaining the knowledge in that field. According to Jude Carroll there are no solutions to fully prevent plagiarism, however with the plagiarism on the rise the universities are implementing methods to minimise it. “We will never prevent students from colluding, plagiarising and breaking the rules but we can deter them by putting in place a range of activities and procedures, each on its own unable to make much difference, but in combination, able to change the way everyone deals with

While Tim Gabriel claims that it is the easiness of Internet use that is at faulty, where as David Callahan is disagreeing and saying it is the administrations and staff’s fault for not helping and explain why plagiarism is wrong. Many believe people that cheat or plagiarize are lazy and that they want the easy way out. People that plagiarize might think it is faster and easier to get things done. Gabriel explains, “Ms. Brookover, who works at the campus library, has pondered the differences between researching in the stacks and online. “Because you’re not walking into a library, you’re not physically holding the article, which takes you closer to ‘this doesn’t belong to me,’ ” she said. Online, “everything can belong to you really easily” (Gabriel 14). Ms. Brookover explains how the students today are in a different era, before one would have to take time and search for answers in books and journals, where as now all the answers are one click away on the Internet. It is very easy to take someone else’s ideas and make them your because of the Internet according to Gabriel. Callahan said “ America wasn't a fair place for kids like him, so it made sense to try to level the playing field by bending a few rules” (Callahan 3). Students start bending the rules the minutes they copy a phrase or a paragraph that isn’t theirs. Many colleges out their expect college students

Schools today have a very large problem with academic dishonesty. Not only high schools, but also colleges as well have and abundance of students who cheat regularly. Although cheating is addressed in many school policies, a shocking number of students get away with it, and teachers do nothing about it. Whether its copying someone’s assignment to get theirs done, or plagiarizing an entire paper, students cheat.

Not only does it compare with sources from the internet, but also compares any history of past essays written by students, and or past students, that may exist within the computers system. However, it is believed that one out of three high school students plagiarize an assessment with the help of the internet (Facts and Stats). It is almost impossible for teachers to interrogate and punish all of these students simply because they have greater responsibilities. Therefore, as generations pass through high schools, school administration and teachers will develop strategies to implement within their course to help prevent the crime of plagiarism. An article published in 2011, concludes the idea that plagiarism is on the rise, and they it must be fought. Some technique enlisted within the article include choosing more abstract prompts and having more assignments completed within class time (Bailey). By implementing a creative prompt, the educational system will become more concrete as students will have a harder time finding an essay to copy relating to such a subject. Having a prompt dealing with the individual itself will be nearly impossible to

There are myriad examples in academic history that one could identify that not only tarnished the reputations of the culprits but also sullied the reputation of the institution as to where they were a part of. Furthermore, there are many different types of academic violations: cheating, plagiarism, fabrication, etc. These distinct infractions have greater effects on the represented institution economically, socially, and holistically than those imposed on the offenders themselves. In order to truly understand the wide gamut of such effects, this paper will focus on three case studies that cover the two most popular choices of academic dishonesty: cheating and plagiarism. The first case study is concerning the infamous Harvard cheating scandal in 2012, in which around 125 students were investigated for cheating on a final examination. The second regards another large-scale incident of 28 high school sophomores in a Piper, Kansas. These students plagiarized from the Internet on a botany project. The third actually holds not the student, but the teacher at fault for changing answers to standardized tests. This last area of teachers kindling the cheating process actually will involve three different schools with similar incidents. Nevertheless, it is more appropriate to focus on the effects of cheating in a more traditional setting, that being the Harvard case.

Technology is rapidly evolving and changing, and as a result of the increasing availability and propagation of several forms of technology, academic dishonesty cases in every college and university have greatly multiplied and become a global issue. The issue on cheating behaviors in students is so pervasive and uncontrollable that it is almost considered as commonplace (Arhin & Jones, 2009). One of the hardest challenges for educators is knowing how and when to discipline their students. In the given scenario, there are several issues to take into account; the first and foremost being the issue of academic dishonesty. Academic dishonesty is defined by the Webster dictionary as the intentional participation in deceptive practices regarding one’s academic work or the work of another (Faucher & Caves, 2009). Jones (2011) states that many institutions of higher education have adopted academic dishonesty policies, instituted academic integrity tutorial completion prerequisites for next term registration, and acquired plagiarism software detection tools. They go on to say that within the past few years, high-tech cheating is gradually replacing the simple cut-and-paste cheating, and educators must be proactive and develop instructional strategies that integrate all facets of appropriate digital citizenship, that is, digital ethics. By implementing these academic dishonesty and integrity policies and making them attainable to

Turnitin.com is a web-site devoted to identifying plagiarized works handed in by students to teachers. Teachers, or learning institutes, apply for a membership at this site, and membership prices vary according to the number of documents a member submits in a month's time or the number of teachers who are going to be using this membership. There is also a free trial option, which this author decided to take advantage of, to determine the accuracy of this service. The document submission process is actually quite simple. Upon receiving a user name and password, the user may access his or her account at any time. Teachers who wish to check documents submitted by students believed to be plagiarizing can do so by selecting the "Submit New Document" option. Teachers who receive hard copies of student's work would have to then scan the