The emergence of online communication tends to flip older communication theories on its head or even throwing out others that cannot adapt to the ever changing culture. Interpersonal deception theory or IDT is one of many communication theory that did not really focus on the idea of online communication. Although it seems that interpersonal deception theory focuses on the interplay between two parties face to face, I believe that it can still play an important role when it comes to online communication.
Interpersonal deception theory takes a closer look into the conversations held between sender and receiver in regards to deception. Created by David Buller and Judee Burgoon, IDT examines why and how one uses deception. Buller and Burgoon found that deception is often used “to avoid hurting or offending another person, to emphasize their best qualities, to avoid getting into a conflict, or to speed up or slow down a relationship” (Griffin, Ledbetter, & Sparks, 2015, p.97). Deception can be divided into 3 different strategies according to Buller and Burgoon (2015) “falsification, concealment, and equivocation” (p.98) but
…show more content…
Strangers that online can further enhance their best qualities with the use of deception. It is also important to note how often one using deception with close ones. In the Wise and Rodriguez study (2013) they tried to “determine the degree to which undergraduate students engage in deceptive behavior via text messaging” (para.1). What they found was that similar to IDT once the deception was find out the thought that one used deception was looked down upon in any situation. Deception was most likely to occur with friends and family member than other messages work related. They results saw though that “text messaging is an interpersonal form of communication that circumvents professionalism and power”
“Deception is nothing more than planting a seed and letting the suspect fill in the blanks. The most important part of using this
The mere concept of a compulsive or pathological liar is often repulsive to most of us, but the truth is, many of us aren’t that far from crossing that bridge. In her essay, “The Ways We Lie”, Stephanie Ericsson analyzes not only the many occasions in which we lie, but also the meaning and consequences of those lies. Although Ericsson’s definitions are well articulated, the evidence she employs to support many of her statements lack depth.
Stephanie Ericsson is a novelist. She does a great job explaining why people lie and the different types of lies in her essay “The Ways We Lie.” Ericsson’s essay was first published as the cover story for the Utne Reader magazine in 1993. Ericsson tries to send an important message through her essay: “Lying has influence on nearly everyone we have known.” As she describes her experiences with her partner, child, friend, and bank, the situation becomes very familiar to the readers which have gone through similar situations every day” (31,32,33).
In her essay “The Ways We Lie” Stephanie Ericsson (2007) states different ways people lie in their lives and explains the reasons why people lie. Ericsson starts her essay, by explaining how she lied four times in just one day, and that she doesn’t feel guilty about doing it. Although at the same time she explains that everyone lies one way or another but there is no such a thing as a good lie. The author continues her contends by listing different types of lies people use in different situations such as: the white lie, facades, ignoring the plain facts, deflecting, omission, stereotypes and clichés, groupthink, out-and-out lies, dismissal, and finally delusion then she explains each in detail by providing examples.
Angelo Segura English 12 Honors Dr. Jen 5 May 2018 The moment we proclaim we don’t or have never lied is the moment we lie. It doesn’t matter how well we say it, there are points in our lives when we are faced with certain situations where the only viable option to get out of it is to lie. Lies may be categorized, but whether it’s a good lie or a bad lie, it’s still a lie. Throughout her essay, “The Ways We Lie”, Stephanie Ericsson explores and exploits different kinds of lies we may use in our daily lives.
Honesty and deception both play valuable roles in all parts of personal lives and society. Richard Gunderman stated, “To tell the truth is to live authentically and responsibly, to really live.” Living honestly is a way to have less stress to your life, proven by Richard Gunderman in “Is lying bad for us?” However, dishonesty seems to at an all time high with the growth of communication as stated in “On Bullshit” by Harry Frankfurt. In addition, lying can provide incredible short-term benefits discussed by Stephanie Ericsson in “The Ways We Lie.” Gunderman’s claim on authenticity is valid because most cultures see honesty and trust as two of the more lauded values. Telling the truth relieves stress and adds trust. Yet, there is a seemingly
As many know, we lie to cover up things that we don’t want others to know. Maybe when you were a child you broke your brothers toy and when he confronted you, you lied and said you had no idea who did it, or maybe you completely try to change the subject. In a way, that is what interpersonal deception theory is, it’s an attempt to explain how individuals handle actual deception at the conscious or subconscious level while they are engaged in a face-to-face communication. And Actually This type of deception has 3 aspects such as falsification, concealment, and equivocation.
Deception is used in different contexts, with a variety of reasons, and the deception used turns out
We are told from a very young that we should tell the truth, and that lying is wrong; an immoral action which we should not engage in. Yet lying is a large part of daily life, whether it be our lying to others or others lying to us, around us, or lying in ways that affect our lives. Oftentimes, the lies we tell are for social gain; for the purposes of esteem, affection, or respect. We lie as a way to manage others impressions of us. Studies have found that women are generally more intimate in their interactions, which would suggest that they lie less. However, might women lie more to benefit others, as opposed to self-centered lies? A study by DePaul et al. (1996) set out to answers questions about the frequency of lying, types of lies told,
During this paper we will look at why people lie to others. When judging a lie, it can be easier to accept if one looks at the purpose behind it. Different intentions bring different levels of deserving judgment. Through research, I found that many people have already studied relationship deceit. Many researchers have proven that deceit often comes from the want to protect their significant other, rather than hurt them. I will discuss coping mechanisms for handling when this situation arises.
Deception According to Hyman (1989) deception implies that an agent acts or speaks so as to induce a false belief in a target or victim. Deception can occur in everyday life. Whether it is telling someone they look nice or not telling them that they look fat. This is an important process for forming relationships and general social interaction.
Forms of Self-Deception There are two forms of self-deception; twisted and straight. In twisted self-deception, people convince themselves of information they do not want to be true (Mele, 1999). For example, a mother convinces herself that her son has been hurt or that he is in trouble when he forgets to call her while out with his friends. This mother will worry herself sick until she hears from her son, she might try to call him and if he does not answer, her own beliefs are confirmed and she may begin to panic.
WHO CAN CATCH A LIAR?’ , Ekman and O’Sullivan, 1991. What is the definition of lying or indeed deception? Well deception can be defined in many ways, but it was termed by Vrij (Vrij, 2000, p.6) as a successful or unsuccessful deliberate attempt, without forewarning, to create in another a belief, which the communicator considers to be untrue. Telling lies is a daily life event, which varies in quite complex ways depending on the situation the person is in and the person being lied to.
Traditionally, lying has been viewed as a sinful, undesirable act. Despite the frequency with which lying occurs and the many forms it takes, individuals continue to interpret lying as fundamentally wrong, immoral, and reprehensible (Kaplar & Gordan, 2004). Intimate relationships are not built on “truth and nothing but the truth”. Most individuals around 92% admit to have lied to a romantic partner or can recall an occasion where they were not completely honest with their partners. (Cole, 2001) Deception can be defined as an deliberate behavior that creates an impression in the recipient that the deceiver knows to be untrue. Lying is the most straightforward example of deceptive behavior (Miller, 2012). What drives a partner in an intimate relationship to lie and deceive? Tim Cole states that there are three interrelated explanations – reciprocity being the first. Reciprocity involves the adjustment of resources exchanged based on the provision of others contributions (Cole, 2001) – a tit for tat. In personal relationships, evidence indicates that reciprocity is strong and it involves the exchange of both positive and negative resources such as affection, respect, hostility, and criticism (Cole, 2001). Apply reciprocity to the use of deception, apparent dishonesty from a partner could be seen as the withdrawal of an important relational resource. Meaning a partner will view their
According to psychologist John Suler and his idea of “The Online Disinhibition Effect”, some people, while online, self-disclose or act differently than they would