Intersectionality In The Classroom Analysis

If not met to the status quo, our sex,gender, ethnicity, able-sim, and class can cause us to be seen as less in society, thus effecting our multiple identities, the amount of power we have, and empowerment we feel or give; which ultimately excludes or includes our privileges. In conclusion, intersectionality is a growing problem in our society today; it continues to enforce oppression and enable people to truly define

Intersectionality is a framework that must be applied to all social justice work, a frame that recognizes the multiple aspects of identity that enrich our lives and experiences. This framework synthesizes and complicates oppressions and marginalization’s. In the article, “Why Intersectionality Can’t Wait” Kimberle Crenshaw talks about how the purpose of intersectionality has been lost. Intersectional somehow creates an environment of bullying and privilege checking. This society cannot afford to have movements that are not intersectional because all races need to be embraced and have equality.

Crenshaw et al (2013). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Chicago: The University of Chicago

Intersectionality has truly opened my eyes in cases where there is a possibility where two systems of oppression can be working together to make life a struggle for a certain group or race. In the political world when someone feels that they are being mistreated or being taken advantage of they make their voice heard. They search for the correct people to help them in their situation and once in court and they feel that they have been mistreated for example racially and gender discrimination the question now becomes well which one is it? Gender or race? It cannot be both. Well, why can’t we choose both options each is a brick in the wall of oppression that everyone has faced at least once in their life. Not to generalize the fact that people face more walls in their life than others based on certain privileges from the type of skin, class, or the global power of wealth and how much it is used for ill intentions. Intersectionality creates lenses in seeing the “bricks” of the wall, seeing what each one stands for and what it does to us. However, it also shows us where it is weak and way for us as scholars to find the weak points and change our groups future where we will no longer fear to speak about the injustices we see every day and will be able to fight and give knowledge to our “enemy” as well for they could see their error as well.

Intersectionality can help us better understand heinous acts against enslaved African American women, poor women of color, and poor white women who severed as experimental subjects and abused in medical science. This topic made me really think about how hormonal birth control pills were heavily tested on Puerto Rico women before they had any idea of the long term or short-term effects. The researchers knew they could get away with it because women were largely ignored in science and women of color even more so. They felt even if this pill harmed these women, they were treating it as if it were an animal study and better for the greater good of society. This is not just because they were women but also because they were poor women of color

Intersectionality framework help’s individual’s understanding of unequal treatment in general by exploring the disadvantages and advantages of all groups of people. It forces individuals to admit the limitations of simplifying

These types of issues require not only an intersectionality approach, but re-conceptualizing our understanding of individuals. Much of the work that culminated in the passing of the Americans with Disabilities Act was predicated on the idea that through legislation, barriers could be removed to allow disabled people to achieve “independence.” Just a quick persuing of the disability organizations in Wisconsin finds eight with the word “independence” right in the organization name (http://www.disabilityrightswi.org/links). However, it is important, especially for disabled people, to unpack the ontological baggage of that term and the implications in devising strategies to dismantle structural inequities. We live in societies dominated by

The perception of race and gender as binary opposites rather than intersecting social iden-tities, underestimates the complexity of social status (Nash, 2008) as does the perception of sex-ual identity and race as binaries. For both theoretical and political purposes, intersectionality promotes a means of analyzing and understanding the complexity of social identities beyond bi-naries (Nash, 2008) and devoid of competitive notions. The majority of us are socialized to ad-here to “competitive either/or thinking” instead of in terms of compatibility (hooks, 2000) when we discuss, analyze or advocate for social reforms. People’s social identities do not hold hierar-chical importance, but are interconnect in how they shape and affect a person’s

Current Black feminists concur with the intersectional analysis approach to provide a crucial lens for reframing and creating new knowledge in recognizing the variations within marginalized groups to assert new ways of studying power, inequality, and ignorance (Collins & Bilge 2016; Collins, 2000; Lorde, 2014; Smith, 1982; Thornton-Dill & Zambrama, 2017). In order to bridge this tension between the White K-12 institution and Black women in art education, there is a need to better understand intersectional lens of race and gender that ignores race and gender. In this dissertation proposal, I question how White ignorance provides a deeper understanding concerning the multidimensionalities of Black women, and how these multidimensionalities are translated in the field of art education. As I question the biases between race and gender, I am viewing

The central idea of this article focuses on intersectionality and how it affects different people's point of view. In the article, intersectionality is described as different kinds of identities people have. These identities are race, gender, sex,disability, and sexual orientation. Intersectionality also impacts how oppression and privilege connect and influence each other. Oppression is when someone faces unfair treatment because of their identity. This article gave us the story of Nicole who is in ninth grade who faces oppression from her teacher because she constantly misses her first period class and rarely turns in her homework, and as a result her grades are suffering. The teachers do not take the time to peel back the layers of Nicole's

Over 70 women died in 2016 due to domestic or family violence abuse in Australia (Destroy the Joint, 2017). This is a grim statistic but helps in reminding us of the enormity of the problem. Some women are, however, more at risk than others including women with a disability, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and culturally and linguistically diverse women (Phillips and Vandenbroek, 2014). Intersectionality, first defined by civil rights advocate Kimberle Williams Crenshaw, describes how experiences of oppression vary from person to person, as people are an amalgamation of different factors and belongings including race, religion, sexuality, gender and so on (Crenshaw, 1989). Primarily, it acknowledges the challenges faced by people who experience multiple layers of structural

Definition: Intersectionality is defined as “a framework for conceptualizing a person, or group of people as affected by a number of discriminations and disadvantages. It takes into account people’s overlapping identities and experiences in order to understand the complexity of prejudice they face” (YM Boston). In other words, intersectionality is the concept that individuals are often discriminated by various sources of oppression such as their religion, class, sexual orientation and many other identifiers.

The application of intersectionality allows for the study of other forms of subordinations such as gender and class (Crenshaw, 1991). Solórzano and Yosso (2002) argue that the intersection of race, gender, and class can provide answers to theoretical, conceptual, methodological and pedagogical educational research

Since 2016, there has been a notable and insatiable effort from minority groups to have their experiences at the hands of oppression legitimized and recognized as valid by the majority. However, what many people tend to overlook is that these oppressed groups are also fighting for validity from another minority group. For example, the fight for recognition of women of a racial minority within the feminist movement, or the acknowledgement of Deaf people of color within the Deaf community. This overlap, and the experiences people endure because of it, is commonly referred to as intersectionality. The word itself has been around since the 1980s, coined by an African-American woman named Kimberlé Crenshaw in an essay she wrote about feminist theory and how the feminist movement itself only focused on the factor of gender, rather than other identities that influence a woman’s experience with oppression ("New Words: Intersectionality"). Although there are numerous amounts of intersections that one person can experience, this essay aims to focus on the intersectionality of Queer people of color, as well as racism and oppression within the LGBTQ+ community.

The theory of intersectionality has received a widespread of various distinct definitions and usage; it is often unclear of its designed function may be. Intersectionality is defined as “the acknowledgment that different forms of identity-based discrimination can combine to give rise to unique brands of injustice”(Lucas 8). In other words, how the classification of one’s individuality such as gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and class can intertwine with each other among the social structure. The term was first coined by feminist and civil rights advocate Kimberlé Crenshaw who spoke upon the discrimination and marginalization of black women and how both institutions interconnect with one another. The significance of