Interviewing Techniques And Their Use Of Body Maps

Prosecutors normally meet witnesses at a relatively early stage in the proceedings to discuss special measures and related issues. The witness’s overall subjective experience of participating in criminal proceedings might thereby be enhanced.

U.S. Supreme Court’s main concern can be seen in their conclusion regarding the process on in-custody interrogation. Due to the fact that such a process entails pressures that work to undermine an individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would not otherwise do so freely (3), was a main concern of the Supreme

The media clip of the journalist Michael Parkinson interviewing the actress Meg Ryan is a clear demonstration of a variety of communication strategies being employed by parties who are not familiar with one another. In many ways, this mimics the therapeutic conversations that occur between health professionals and patients when they begin working with one another. In these situations, the interviewer must use a range of questioning techniques to encourage the interviewee to provide information. For this to be successful, the participants in the conversation must usually feel comfortable and at ease.

Many of today’s interrogation models being utilized in police investigations have an impact on false confessions. The model that has been in the public eye recently is the social psychological process model of interrogation known as the “The Reid Technique.” There are two alternatives used by the police today to replace the Reid Technique, one is the PEACE Model and the other is Cognitive Interviewing. These methods are not interrogation techniques like Reid but interview processes.

Early surveys by the NCVS were felt that the information obtained in the interview of the victim may not be reliable. Interviewees can be vulnerable to several types of biases including memory errors, errors of deception, telescoping, and sampling errors.

Information is the lifeblood of a criminal investigation. The ability of investigators to obtain useful and accurate information from eyewitnesses of crimes is crucial to effective law enforcement, yet full and accurate recall is difficult to achieve (Stewart, 1985). Such elicitation of complete and accurate recall from people is important in many aspects of life; specifically, eyewitness recall may determine whether a case is solved. Principle advocates of the cognitive interview (Fisher, Geiselman, Holland & MacKinnon,

There are specific ethical considerations that need to be addressed when investigating Homicide and rape. A few of these ethical considerations are shared between the two such as the investigators mind state. This plays an important role in the preparations required for a successful prosecution. The investigator must be open-minded to any and all possibilities and be un-bias. The investigator must also know how to conduct all the elements of an investigation in the proper manner from a professional and legal aspect.

The first interrogation we watched in class was that of a 20-year-old named Joshua Tuttle. Mr. Tuttle was being charged with attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. He was messaging and supposed to be meeting up with a girl named Jesse who he thought was 13 or 14. Joshua was the focus of a sting operation and has been featured on the television program “To Catch a Predator”. When we picked up on the interrogation, Joshua was sitting across the table from the interrogator. Joshua’s chair was pushed up against the wall and in the corner of the room. This is good because it is supposed to make him uncomfortable. The table that sat between Joshua and the interrogator was cluttered with papers. This is not good because this gives the suspect something to look at besides the interrogator, which in turn can change the suspect’s body language and or answers.

To reduce some of the problems that have been found with eyewitness memory and testimony, I recommend not mistaking confidence for memory accuracy and using multiple techniques and interviewing models to develop more accurate and consistent information (i.e. using the cognitive enhanced interview model and combined with the Reid model or other models). Also, courts and jurors need to test/check for suggestibility and coercive interview or investigative practices before trials

For my ethnographic study, I chose to do my research at The Supreme Court Criminal Term. This courthouse is housed in two separate buildings in southern Manhattan, one on 100 Centre Street and the other on 111 Centre Street. I chose this courthouse because it’s convenient being that I live in Manhattan which made it easier for me to access. My commute to the courthouse was simple and quick, I took the 4 or 5 train from 125th street to Brooklyn Bridge/City Hall and walked about two blocks. My mother also works nearby so she was able to accompany me during two of my visits. I’ve gone to this courthouse a few times before for friends and family matters which gave me an advantage because I already knew how the entering process went.

After a individual is apprehended, a pretrial services or probation officer of the court directly interviews the defendant and conducts an investigation of the defendant's backdrop. The data got by the pretrial services or probation

My survey will ask questions about how they currently use this type of technology, why they use it, and their demographics. This topic is quite novel because very little research has been done to determine providers’ perceptions on these issues especially in correctional and forensic settings. Knowing this information is vital because it allows us to highlight strengths and weaknesses of this modality for providing forensic assessments from the providers’ point of view. Knowledge of potential problem areas helps to show what can be done to improve the technology, and knowing areas where videoconferencing is particularly useful can help to spread information to other providers who may be able to put this to

Williams suggests that due to the deviant lifestyle of his subjects, the cocaine kids, this interviewing stage can delay the time between interviews (1989). That being said, Williams seems to strongly support this method of research because it not only helps him get answers to his questions, but also allows the interview to branch and bring up relevant topic that he had not thought of before. Beyond this, Williams tried his best to understand sub-communications such as the subjects’ body language, including emotions, discreet forms of communication via hand signs, and attire. He did this to ensure he also observed instances that are generally under-the-radar, but still have meaning.

TABLE 1 Ten Most Frequent Interrogation Practices, as Self-Reported by 631 North American Detectives (Kassin et al., 2007) Tactic Isolating the suspect from family and friends Conducting interrogation in a small private room Identifying contradictions in the suspect’s story Establishing rapport/gaining the suspect’s trust Confronting the suspect with evidence of guilt Appealing to the suspect’s self-interest Offering sympathy, moral justifications, & excuses

Sullivan (1954) supported that clinical interviews are generally the first interaction between the patient and clinician anda re use to find out who the patient is, why they are here and what they come through to be in their present or existing situation. The basic advantage of the clinical interview is that interviewer can transcribe the questions as needful, illuminate doubt and supply that the answers are appropriately understood, by repeating and rephrasing the questions. The interviewer can also collect non-verbal cues from the client or respondent. Any disturbance, stress, worry and troubles that the client experiences can be defined through, frowns (not the tolerant), body language and nervous taping, unawares displayed by any person. This would be unlikely to specify in a telephone meeting or interview. So face to face aids the interviewee to get the wanted outcomes and aid them the phrase of the person to whom they are interviewing. By understanding the facial expression of the client the interviewer can certainly and easily grasp what the client wish to say them about any thing. The basic disadvantage of the clinical interview is that face to face communication between clinician and client is the geographically limitations they may lay on the surveys and the numerous resources necessary if such surveys required to be made internationally and nationally. The expense of training interviews to minituarize