Essay on Interviewing Techniques

Many of today’s interrogation models being utilized in police investigations have an impact on false confessions. The model that has been in the public eye recently is the social psychological process model of interrogation known as the “The Reid Technique.” There are two alternatives used by the police today to replace the Reid Technique, one is the PEACE Model and the other is Cognitive Interviewing. These methods are not interrogation techniques like Reid but interview processes.

The subject of my interview was Juan Chavay. He was born and raised in small village close to the mountains. The actual name was not mentioned by Juan, but he emphasized on a small, remote village. He came to America in 2009 and has been here since. He is currently trying to achieve citizenship, but is encountering problems with actually achieving it. He has since been here on a work visa, which allows him to stay in the US for an extended period of time. He says he will continue the work he is doing in Mississippi.

By the prosecution asking the defense witness leading questions, it is likely that the witness will agree with a statement that he or she did not understand. For example, when the press asked, “So Henry pulled one out, too?” (42). This question is leading because it encourages the desired answer from the witness. In addition to asking leading questions, the press also asked multiple questions at one time, which confused the witness (Della).

Information is the lifeblood of a criminal investigation. The ability of investigators to obtain useful and accurate information from eyewitnesses of crimes is crucial to effective law enforcement, yet full and accurate recall is difficult to achieve (Stewart, 1985). Such elicitation of complete and accurate recall from people is important in many aspects of life; specifically, eyewitness recall may determine whether a case is solved. Principle advocates of the cognitive interview (Fisher, Geiselman, Holland & MacKinnon,

Each team of attorneys have interviewed several witnesses before the day of the trial. After interviewing, the attorneys compiled a list of questions to ask the witnesses during their testimonies.

As time goes on, eyewitness testimony has become more and more of a disputed topic due to many different factors. The first study I was exposed to was in an introductory psychology class which sparked my interest into the topic. For this reason, I chose to look at different demographics such as, gender and major, and see if those factors had any impact on the perception of eyewitness testimony. My main issues remained the same throughout this research project.

Defense Attorney: While the defense is cross examining the states witnesses, they can ask; were you using a controlled substance on the night Mr. Wallace was killed? Did you see the shooter well?, Are you related to the suspect or the victim? The defense will have the witnesses tell their account of what happen, or try to question their own memory, place doubts in what they are saying.They will ask if they have a criminal history to show the jury that they

A number of weaknesses have been identified in the prosecutor’s method of cross-examining the witness, Mr. Aaron Smith. It is important to understand that effective communication is a two-way exchange of information from both subjects.

Victims of various crimes are usually from diverse backgrounds regarding their cultural beliefs, physical abilities, and disabilities as well language among other factors. Therefore, as an interviewer, one should consider all the factors to ensure that the interviewing process goes on smoothly. It is also the role of the interviewer to make sure that even though the factors are considered, there is the least bias in the process to ensure that the prosecution gets the facts right rather than based on the interviewer’s perception (Thakkar, Jaffe & Vander Linden, 2015). Cultural differences and physical disabilities are some of the most common hindrances of communication during

The victim services professional I interviewed was Rene Carter, victim/witness assistant with the Cumberland County’s District Attorney’s Office. The criminal justice agent I interviewed was Detective M. Wooten, with the Fayetteville Police Department. Detective Wooten is a detective and has worked in different divisions of investigation to include property unit, person’s unit, robbery unit, and aggravated assault unit. Each person was asked the same question and the following are the answers to those questions:

*For the purpose of this assignment and to keep the privacy of participates, the interviewee will be addressed as such, or as Person A.

I would want to know which part of the statement they had focused on, because the difference in opinion from witness statements would probably originate from different focuses on the same issue. After understanding their position, I would then reevaluate my own opinion to see if my opinion is truly based on the facts of the case or not. If it was not then I would have to change my position, but if I do not find an issue with my position on the issue, then I would continue to attempt to get my point across to the rest of the members of

In the first day prosecuting attorneys were assigned witnesses for direct and cross examination. I was responsible for preparing direct questions to the police officer who was first to arrive at the crime scene. Based on his statement I came up with multiple questions which allowed to determine the events and condition of the victim on that date. While preparing both direct questions and cross examination questions I watched videos of actual court hearings where attorneys questioned witnesses. This approach helped a lot. After coming up with direct questions, which for me the process was interesting and intriguing, I asked my group members to review them and give their feedback. Questions for cross examination gave me most trouble. I found it complicated to come up with sufficient and proper questions in order to question the witness and find the best possible way of subjecting his statement. Videos, both presented in class and ones I found myself did not resonate well with me. Despite that, I uploaded my cross-examiantion questions and asked for the

Conducting interviews is fundamental as a case manager. In order to understand more about good interviewing, I decided to watch an interview about an addict mother conducted by Dr. Phil. While watching this interview, I made some notes on attitudes and characteristics that I considered important for good interviewing. The characteristics will be presented in the following paragraphs.

Interviewing is a procedure which recounts to a controlled situation in which one person asks a chain of questions to another person, relating to a