Intimate Partner Violence Essay

Approximately 1.3 million women each year are victims of physical assault by a partner in the United States, with larger numbers of such incidents not being reported (Herman, Rotunda, Williamson, & Vodanovich, 2014, p. 2). Intimate partner violence (IPV) is defined as sexual, physical, or psychological harm by a current or former partner or spouse, which can include sexual violence, psychological and emotional violence, or physical violence (Herman et al., 2014, p. 2). IPV is also known as dating violence, domestic violence, family violence, or spouse abuse.

Without denying that there is partner violence in all social strata, the author concludes that there are factors linked to the social structure and social area that contribute to a greater frequency of the problem. It should also be noted that the factors that contribute to partner violence may be the same as those that determine violence toward strangers. Although it implicitly assumes the role of political economy in the generation of structural contexts. Moreover, in the case of the couple, the traditional distribution of functions, pointing out that in the case of men, power deficits, and control and a devaluation of living conditions in impoverished communities, are high-risk factors for violence against the spouse or partner.

2017). It’s recognized that “general nursing curricula programs not only lack significant information about all types of violence but is also deficient in responsive evidence-based content and practices, particularly such content and practices related to IPV” (Connor, P. D., Nouer, S. S., Speck, P. M., Mackey, S. N., & Tipton, N. G., 2013). Evidence shows the difference in readiness between nursing students who have had IPV training in comparison to those who have not; thus, they were more prepared to address and assess victims of IPV. Accurate assessment of an individual’s mien, and signs and symptoms of potential IPV is essential to mitigating the risk factors of IPV as well as the prevention of ongoing abuse. Vital to that role is proper understanding and use of health promotion. It’s evident that careful assessment is the foundation to which primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions can be determined.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a type of abuse that occurs between people who are involved in a close relationship. “Intimate partner” is a term that is used to include both current and former spouses as well as dating partners. IPV exists along a continuum that ranges from a single episode of violence through ongoing battering.

Summary: This Article evaluates the violence and abuse conducted by police officers towards their intimate partners (Goodmark 1188). Studies show that there is a brief connect toward police officers public and private lives. Interpersonal violence of off-duty officers has been an issue throughout the country for many years. Due to the amount of training police officers receive they are seen to be more dangerous and violent towards their significant others than the average individual and are more likely to be abusive. Research used the National Police Misconduct Project, in which lists the number of incidents of intimate partner abuse conducted by police officers in various jurisdictions ranging from Washington to Virginia. Other research relied on self-reports of the abused. The article shows many examples of police violence and abuse where police officers physically or verbally assault their partners. Regarding two cases in Baltimore of 2013 two police officers killed their partners and then subsequently killed themselves shortly after.

One of the most important things to look at when studying IPV, according to Maneta et al., is that the abuse or maltreatment of a child increases the likelihood for the child to be the abuser in the future with his or her individual family (Maneta et al., 2012). Research of IPV and abuse have shown a strong correlation between being a victim of violence as a child and then showing abuse and violence in

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is described a psychological, emotional, sexual or physical harm to a person by their spouse or former partner (Breiding et al, 2015). National reports have revealed that about one in three women experience IPV (Sharron et al, 2015). Intimate partner violence is a growing epidemic in the United States. However, recent studies have focused on rural regions, such as Appalachia.

Intimate partner abuse describes physical, sexual, and psychological harm by a current or former partner or spouse (Fanslow, McMahon, Saltzman, & Shelley, 2002). Healthy people 2020 recognizes physical violence among intimate partners as a topic that should be addressed concerning injury and violence prevention in the United States (Healthy People 2020, 2014). Intimate Partner Abuse is an issue that often affects entire families, not just the person that is being abused. Several historical studies attempt to make a connection between intimate partner abuse and homeless. Browne 's research showed that 50 percent of the homeless women interviewed were the victims of abuse

Domestic violence exists everywhere and affects all people regardless of socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, sex, ethnicity, or religion. Most times physical violence is accompanied by emotional abuse and controlling behaviors. The result of domestic violence includes physical injury, psychological issues, and death. Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) occurs in 1 of 4 women in the United States and can be correlated with a loss of emotional, social, physical and mental health. Intimate Partner Violence is an issue that does not receive a lot of recognition and is overlooked majority of the time. There is a lot of information on women in intimate partner violence relationships that explains how it affects women physically, mentally, and socially.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is defined as sexual, physical or psychological abuse by a current or past spouse or partner and is one of the largest public issues the Unites States faces today. It is estimated that roughly 15.5 million children live in a household effected by IPV in the United States (Gustafsson, Coffman, Cox 2014). Children who are effected by IPV are more likely to have behavioral issues along with their development being negatively impacted (O'Campo, Caughy, Nettles 2010). It is important to research IPV to see how it can be minimized as much as possible along with seeing how people are effected by IPV.

The other issue of IPV is the effects that it has on individuals. There have been several reported cases of people that have suffered from IPV, and the effects are not pleasing. One of the effects that are associated with IPV is physical trauma where a person suffers from bruises, broken hands, legs, jaws, or loss of teeth (Chan, 2012). When IPV takes place, the person doing it does not care about their partner and hits them with anything that they can come across. They may use sticks, knives, or kick them or fight them with their fists (Varcarolis, &Hatler, 2013). Whichever method is used usually result in physical trauma for the person. Death is also an effect of IPV as people may suffer be

Intimate partner violence is a dangerous and frightening issue threatening women worldwide. Intimate partner violence, also known as domestic violence, describes a cycle of abuse that involves either actual or threatened physical, sexual, psychological or emotional violence performed on someone by a spouse, boyfriend or girlfriend, or significant other (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Although it is not often discussed, intimate partner abuse is an incredibly common public health problem. In fact, it is one of the most common forms of violence facing women of all ages, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds, in which more than four million women in the United States experience abuse from a partner each year (Office on Women’s

It is believed that a large part of the population is in risk of this type of victimization (Giardino, 2010). With the health care community taking more interest in this issue, new screening tools have been developed to guide in the victim’s safety and find a way for them to leave the relationship (Giardino, 2010). In addition, intervention programs have been developed for the purpose of decreasing the risk of perpetrators from re-offending. There is an estimated 5.3 million IPV cases among woman that have occurred each year in the United States (Giardino, 2010). Two million have resulted in injuries and 1,300 deaths. It is more common for females to be victims of IPV but there has been cases where the victims are male or transgender. They are either married or single, involved in a heterosexual or same-sex relationship, and are members of any ethnic or socioeconomic group (Giardino, 2010). The myth of victims being poor, uneducated women is false. There is controversy in regards to the race and economic status of victims of intimate partner violence. There is no relationship between IPV and race, economic status, or educational level (Giardino, 2010). According to the National Violence against Women (NVAW), the ethnic groups of women most affected by IPV are American Indian, Alaskan Native, African American, and Hispanics

In this article, I will focus on the circumstances surrounding the IPV in the US, some aspects of emotional/verbal IPV, prevention of IPV, and treatment options. According to CDC, millions of Americans experience IPV across the lifespan (2017). It is a serious public health problem that can be prevented. IPV is highly prevalent in the US, and 1 in 4 adult women have experienced severe physical violence (CDC, 2017). Besides, over 3 million women report cases of IPV yearly. The main reasons for the persistency and subsequent damaging outcomes are because susceptible female partners accept male partner violence, marital attitudes that accept violence in a relationship, poor communication skills, and poor conflict management techniques. Likewise,

The authors explained that Intimate Partner Violence or IPV is violent crimes committed against a person by a “current or former spouses, boyfriends, or girlfriends. (Morris, Shoffner, & Newsome, 2009) The statistics