Into The Wild Literary Analysis

Jon Krakauer diverges from the story of McCandless’s journey, to inform the readers how all of the other adventures that occurred were similar. He wanted to show how other people were in his situation, that wanted to conquer the world with what the others had with them.

Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.

In his novella, The Death of Ivan Ilych, Leo Tolstoy offers his audience a glance into the life and death of an ambitious man, Ivan Ilych. Tolstoy uses the death of Ivan Ilyich to show his audience the negative consequences of living the way Ilych did. Ivan Ilych followed society and made decisions based on what others around him conformed to and not so much about what he genuinely wanted until he was on his deathbed. As death approaches Ilych he realizes that he wrecked everything that should be meaningful in his life in order to work and make money and in the end his friends did not really care much about him. Ilych’s desire to conform made him live a miserable life and led him to darkness. Ivan Ilych attained everything that society

Jon Krakauer, fascinated by a young man in April 1992 who hitchhiked to Alaska and lived alone in the wild for four months before his decomposed body was discovered, writes the story of Christopher McCandless, in his national bestseller: Into the Wild. McCandless was always a unique and intelligent boy who saw the world differently. Into the Wild explores all aspects of McCandless’s life in order to better understand the reason why a smart, social boy, from an upper class family would put himself in extraordinary peril by living off the land in the Alaskan Bush. McCandless represents the true tragic hero that Aristotle defined. Krakauer depicts McCandless as a tragic hero by detailing his unique and perhaps flawed views on society,

Chris McCandless, subject of Jon Krakauer’s successful novel, Into the Wild, met his fate in the Alaskan wilderness. McCandless donated all his money to OXFAM America after double majoring in anthropology and history at Emory University, then walked away from his old life. He took on the name Alexander Supertramp, and the next time his family would see him would be as a corpse, brought to his knees by nature’s unforgiving presence.

Chris McCandless, Jon Krakauer, and Henry David Thoreau embrace the ideal of a transcendental lifestyle. In the book, Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer shows the connection between Chris McCandless and Henry David Thoreau. They both believe in certain points such as living deliberately, simplicity, and individualism. Within the book, Into the Wild, Krakauer reveals the philosophy of Transcendentalism through living deliberately, simplicity, and individualism.

Leo Tolstoy, an incredible Russian writer, captures this idea in a quote; “The

Tolstoy, in other hand, immerses a reader into a short life story of the protagonist, starting from his family origins, to his youth and his adult life. The misleading nature of Ivan Ilyich’s existence is demonstrated from the very beginning of novella which accurately describes the illusory reality the main character is living in. The reader might be curious why the normal and ordinary life could be horrible. It is not much possible that Tolstoy was against ordinariness itself, but rather to show the reader that the main character Ivan Ilyich never reaches anything meaningful and exciting in his life. Ivan becomes kind of a prisoner of social milieu, he does everything that is expected of him: he goes to law school just like his father did, he finds a job, gets promoted, earns enough money to enjoy his life, fulfills his duty. He becomes kind of a spiritual zombie. Tolstoy describes main character’s absence of “real” life in a subtle but authentic way, showing that Ivan is not much different from the people in his circle. As an inventor of his own illusion, or the “lie”, in which main character lives, Ivan is not showing much curiosity, moreover he is not in search of any kind of truth. He simply exists in his undisturbed, tranquil environment, until something unpredictable happens to him. During one of his ordinary actions, while hanging the new curtains in his new house, he slips, falls down, banging his side against the window frame. This

Leo Tolstoy wrote: The Death of Ivan Ilyich in 1886 to expression his own view of how life should be lived and what actually matter most at the end. According to Tolstoy, there are 2 ways to live life; one is by outer appearances which are a propriety; a decorum; and a standard of conduct. The second way is living by inner appearances and spiritual life which is “the real thing” that makes one’s life worthwhile.

“The death of Ivan Ilych”, one of the widely celebrated piece of literature written by Leo Tolstoy, talks about a delusional man whose life seems to come to an end as he approaches the reality. It is a convincing story in which a person struggles to see the reality in the falsity he had created. The novella discusses a bitter and disturbing truth of human reality: the morale choices a person makes in his lifetime and the consequences he faces in his deathbed because of his choices.

After the reading the book of the “The Death of Ivan Ilych” by Leo Tolstoy the reader can conclude that not everyone lives a happy life. People can go from being happy to sad in just an instant. This story teaches the reader that not everyone is going to be there in the hard moments, only those who truly appreciate and understand the person in pain will be there supporting. Leo Tolstoy was very up forward on his stories. He usually did not watch what he said. Many people might say his theme and characters role are affected by the life he lived. Every character has their own role and meaning. For example, those who have read any background of Tolstoy can say that he is very similar to Ivan Ilych. Tolstoy lived tough life his parents past away

From the lessons of living a good life to struggling with the inevitability of death, the critics review the moral lessons that are to be learned from reading the work. Some of the critical material claim that Tolstoy’s story is a depiction of bourgeois society and how the characters, in said society, are materialistic and selfish. While these elements do appear within the novella, it is, in my view, fictitious to claim that a person, who lives their life in the service of others, creating meaningful relationships, not worrying about the material things of life, would have an easier time dealing with death. But perhaps I am

Tolstoy’s book represents many things: the tyranny of bourgeois niceties, the terrible weak spots of human heart, the reality of death. But more than anything, it is about the consequences of living one life without, without a true and abiding connection to one’s life.

Leo Tolstoy was an acclaimed writer of his time. Finding his love for writing in early adulthood he had time to grow and flourish with each book he wrote. Tolstoy did not have an easy life and you can feel the emotions he had as an adolescent while reading his words. Through Leo Tolstoy’s childhood and adult life, he faced challenges with family and education, causing his drive for religion and his many accomplished works of literature.

Drama, death, and tragedy interwove in the early life of Tolstoy. The death of his mother had completely changed the path he went on in life. At the young age of two his mother had passed away. His father in his time of grief sent his children to live with a distant relative whom could take care of them. Sent to live with his Aunt Madame Ergolsky Leo Tolstoy’s Aunt became his main caregiver in his young life, but his Father did not abandon him till the age of nine. Consequently, his Father was murdered while he was on a trip of some sort. Moreover, with the death of his Mother and Father Tolstoy’s Aunt became the sole legal guardian of him and his siblings. However, the problems his childhood held he still had many opportunities available to him in his later life.