preview

Into The Wilderness Research Paper

Decent Essays

Planet Earth : The Future : Into The Wilderness

Six million hectares of primary forest have been lost annually since 2000, and average hard coral cover in the Caribbean has decreased from 50% to 10%. Both of these changes occurred in a short period of time, and humans have been the primary cause. Human impact on biodiversity and the environment is very significant. Research has defined humans uses of renewable and nonrenewable resources, their positive and negative impacts on ecosystems, and our solutions and ideas for maintaining biodiversity. Less than 5% of the global population live in the United States, and alone it uses 25% of coal, 26% of oil, and 27% of all natural gas in the world. Humans use a great deal of the world’s natural …show more content…

They implement hunting laws, laws on the use of natural materials, and other things. Many organizations work to construct national parks around areas that should be protected. Others fight for laws to imput to protect resources, wildlife, and rare species. Because of people who believe in our world, 12% of all forests in the world are protected by national park laws. Other places are coming up with ideas to reduce biodiversity destruction. Some places believe in putting a limit on the amount of children you can have to preserve resources. Certain countries believe in paying impoverished countries for resources that are majorly only found in that area. Some areas believe in paying people to use their farmland and plant trees. That way the tree population doesn’t suffer as much. Economically based companies are finding ways to convert polluted water and air into clean usable water and air. Impoverished countries want to put a fee on clean air and water, which are normally inaccessible to …show more content…

In the U.S. it is a major issue that topic of drilling in Alaska. Alaska is rich in oil, but with all of its natural resources there is a very high risk of damaging several ecosystems. People who are against drilling in Alaska make fair point. They believe that if something were to go wrong, the number of wildlife and ocean that would be affected would be to much to clean up. But those who support it believe that it is best to drill because it would save millions of dollars. Both cases make a fair point, but people won’t know the right one choice until they try

Get Access