Introduction Civic relationships are a very crucial issue in the present world because of the dynamism of the society and the factors of environment. The argument is how different groups in the diverse society or particularly in the workplace relate and do collaboration with each other in order to make sure that they create an environment where the main objectives of an organization are achieved in an ethical manner. Until the late 17th century, Aristotle’s philosophical approach dominated the focus of relationships in the society (Natali &Carlo, 2009). His main contribution was on the virtues, happiness, deliberation, justice and happiness. Aristotle’s ideas on civic relationships Aristotle gives the definition of happiness which he …show more content…
If someone portrays some arrogance, it is because politeness lacks in them (Natali &Carlo, 2009). This is because the opposite of something lies on its positive or negative characteristics. For him, justice associated characteristics are vague and that characteristics of injustice are both inward as well as outward. The aim of justice is to ensure that there is proportional exchange in every transaction. According to his view, Aristotle defined human beings as social creatures. It is a natural thing for people to surround themselves with the others who are friends. It is the aim of every human being to expand the network of their friends and this is a very significant part of human existence. For one to try to live without friends is going against the natural laws and this is even nearly impossible. He viewed friendship in a wider perspective rather than just an intimate union. It is more of a mutual kindness between two people devoid of sexual love or family ties. The only reason why people become friends is because they are useful to each other (Natali &Carlo, 2009). Friendship founded on the basis of mutual respect, love and virtues is a foundation for strong relationships. Aristotle concludes by stating that morals ought not to be basis of friendship because people definition of morals differ. In terms of deliberation, Aristotle states that it is out of free will that people become responsible
Within book 8 and 9 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he concludes that an excellent friendship is the most choice-worthy good an individual can externally attain (Aristotle 149, 1170a, section 7). However, in chapter 3 of book 8, Aristotle asserts the finest friendships are enduring insofar the individuals are good, and the virtues remain similar. However, his proposal about the similarities of virtues doesn't seem entirely correct since people gradually change over time, but the relationship can continue to be good and the individuals remain close friends. Aristotle would assert that if the virtuous character of the friend were to change, the friendship could potentially dissolve; unless the agent can return their friend to their original state of similarity. This is because his assertion about an enduring friendship requires that the individuals are both good and similar in virtuous behaviour. Nevertheless, this essay aims to argue that friendships are enduring through the means of gaining/building a state of mutual confidence in our friend, rather individuals being similar in virtue.
In Episode #10, how does Aristotle address the issue of individual rights and the freedom to choose?
Society has not changed much in the thousands of years since Aristotle first addressed ethics in Athens, Greece. Everyday situations and problems he discusses all relate to everyone in the present day. The rules of demeanor and clarifications on virtue that he suggests can all help people today attain a complete and satisfying realization of their duties as an equal member in society and ultimately discover the purpose of life.
Friendship, according to Aristotle there are 3 definitions of friendship. Friendship of Utility, “thus friends whose affection is based on utility do not love each other in themselves, but in so far as some benefit accrues to them from each other.” Friendship of Pleasure, “And similarly with those whose friendship is based on pleasure: for instance, we enjoy the society of witty people not because of what they are in themselves, but because they are agreeable to us.” Friendship of the Good. “The perfect form of friendship is that between the good, and those who resemble each other in virtue. For these friends wish each alike the other’s good in respect of their goodness, and they are good in themselves; but it is those who wish the good of their friends for their friends’ sake who are friends in the fullest sense, since they love each other for themselves and not accidentally. Hence the
According to Aristotle, “friendship is necessary for life”, but what fosters a complete friendship? Aristotle believed that a friendship needs to be “reciprocated goodwill”, and individuals seek the good of the other without any coercion or wrong intention (Book VIII, 1155a, 5-6, 1155b 34). If a level of confidence and love has yet to be established, the friendship can at first appear as a friendship of utility to others. The relationship requires acts of selflessness and mutual partnership in order to move past the surface level connection toward an intimate bond with the other. The outward appearance of utility is overcome by the undeniable bond formed between two individuals who have matured in similar virtue in accord with proper attitude towards the other.
The first friendship that Aristotle mentions in NE VIII.3. is the friendship of utility. Aristotle’s initial claim about the friendship of utility is that “... those who love each other because of utility do not love each other for themselves but in the virtue of some good which they get from each other (NE VIII.3. 1156a.10-12)”. Here Aristotle is claiming
We are social creatures. We surround ourselves with other human beings, our friends. It is in our nature. We are constantly trying to broaden the circumference of our circle of friends. Aristotle understood the importance of friendship, books VIII and IX of the Nicomachean Ethics deal solely with this topic. A modern day definition of a friend can be defined as “one joined to another in intimacy and mutual benevolence independently of sexual or family love”. (Oxford English Dictionary). Aristotle’s view on friendship is much broader than this. His arguments are certainly not flawless. In this essay I will outline what Aristotle said about friendship in the Nichomachaen Ethics and highlight possible
Aristotle once said, “Friendship is a single soul dwelling in two bodies.” There are many things that go into the process of friendship. Some people deal with friendship one way while others deal with it in another way. Cicero had a lot to say about the different aspects of friendship in his time, but how would he view modern friendship? Some friendships Cicero may not be proud of; like the common relationships that are forced on in a classroom or work place and the lack of allowing nature to take control and make the friendships that are meant to happen. However, Cicero would be happy with the way the higher level friendships have developed in virtue
In the book Aristotle and the Philosophy of Friendship, (based off the Nicomachean Ethics) the author, Pangle, informed the audience that Aristotle believe in three different types of friendships based off three different types of motives: Friendships of Utility, Friendships of Pleasure, and Perfect Friendship. He identifies these types of friendships as different types of sources of affection that are lovable as the good, the pleasant, and the useful. Before analyzing Aristotle three types of friendships we must first understand what he meant by friendship. During Aristotle’s rein friendship was commonly known as the love one person had for another. Philia, brotherly love, was essential
The purpose of this essay is to discuss whether politics should be focused on morality with reference to the political thinkers, Aristotle and Plato. Aristotle and Plato have two fundamentally differing views on politics and how it links to morality. Morality to Aristotle and Plato will be analysed through their version of how politics utensils morality to carry out legislation or create a universal manner carried out by the citizens. To achieve this, this essay will examine the following points, Human nature and human soul. This essay will argue how the human nature and human soul differ on its viewpoint of justice and morality and how it should be implemented into political matters.
Aristotle highlighted the importance of friendship through various practices and concepts, such as utility and virtue. Virtuous practices were believed to enhance the friendship and encourage happiness among the participants (Kraut 64). Unfortunately, a friend whose behavior and practices are malevolent causes a rift in the practice of Aristotle’s principles. Therefore, to preserve the friendship and to protect one’s friend, one must do all that is possible to cease his or her friend’s actions.
“No one would choose a friendless existence on condition of having all the other things in the world (Aristotle).” Humans are social beings, social beyond any other creature in the world. Human interaction is a must for survival. It is in our nature. Aristotle understood this, he even had his own analysis of friendship. In the Nicomachean Ethics written by Aristotle, books VIII and IX are based off of friendship. Today, the definition of a friend is, “A person with whom one has a bond of mutual affection, typically one exclusive of sexual or family relations (Oxford Dictionary).” To Aristotle, friendship is much more than this. In this research paper, I will evaluate whether or not Aristotle’s analysis of friendship is applicable to the modern world.
The 5 basis set up in Aristotle’s Ethics are explained on page 252 and are as followed; “A person who wished for and does what is good or what appears to him to be good for his friends sake, a person who wished for the existence and life of his friend for a friends sake, a person who spends his time in our company, whose desires are the same as ours, and a person who shared sorrow and joy with his friend. An overall message of “one must do well for others in order to be a proper friend”1 can be understood with the five basis of friendship to determine if a person is an ideal friend.
Aristotle forwards the view that justice is equality. He takes the Platonic view of justice in which justice is rendering a man his due, and further elaborates on it by saying that equality entails not the indiscriminate treatment of everyone as an equal, but of treating what is similar similarly and what is dissimilar dissimilarly. This is clear in how he says “justice in the abstract is proportion,” and specifically that, in respect to the errors of democracy and oligarchy that “both kinds of equality should be employed;
Aristotle: In Aristotle’s view, an ethical system (self realization philosophy) people who follow their natural abilities also and attain their full potential culminating in their doing good and achieving contentment. He postulates that when a baby is first born, he/she is yet to be a person, but rather one who has the potential to be a person. To be a "real" person, he /she must first realize his/her inherent potential. He concludes that an Unhappy and frustrated person is a result of failed goals and aspirations, frustrated potentials and poor living. In order to be good therefore people must live according to their nature, develop their talent and the feeling of contentment and completeness will be the result. Aristotle believes that social life and wealth are nothing but means to reach someone’s goal and that self realization is what gives happiness.